Skip to main content
Log in

The Revolution Maximally Confused

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Applebaum, D.: 1996, Probability and Information: An Integrated Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, J.: 2001, 'On the Occurrence of Es with a Finite Clause in German', in W. D. Meurers and T. Kiss (eds.), Constraint-Based Approaches to Germanic Syntax, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Z.: 1997, The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Z.: 1998,' Multiple Wh-Fronting and Economy of Derivation', West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 16, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Z. and D. Takahashi: 1998, 'Scrambling and Last Resort', Linguistic Inquiry 29, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. W.: 2000, 'Optimal Syntax', in J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw and J. van de Weijer (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax, Phonology, and Acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 334–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1975, Reflections on Language, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1980, Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1991, 'Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation', in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 417–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1992, 'Language and Interpretation: Philosophical Reflections and Empirical Inquiry', in J. Earman (ed.), Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 99–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1993, 'Naturalism and Dualism in the Study of Language and Mind', International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2, 181–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1995a, 'Language and Nature', Mind 104, 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1995b, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C.: 1997, Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C.: 2001, 'Economy Conditions in Syntax', in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, K.: 2000, 'Optional Wh-Movement in Babine-Witsuwit'en', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 199–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.: 1995, 'Economy and Scope', Natural Language Semantics 3, 283–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.: 1999, Economy and Semantic Interpretation, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, Vol. 35, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, E. and W. Detmar Meurers: 2000, 'Some Remarks on Trends in HPSG', Unpublished paper presented at the International Workshop on HPSG, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen.

  • Hornstein, N.: 1999, 'Movement and Control', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. E. and S. Lappin: 1997, 'A Critique of the Minimalist Program', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 273–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. E. and S. Lappin: 1999, Local Constraints vs. Economy, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitahara, H.: 1997, Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1998, 'Scope Inversion under the Rise-Fall Contour in German', Linguistic Inquiry 29, 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, J.: 2001, 'Resource Sensitivity in the Syntax-Semantics Interface: Evidence from the German Split-NP Construction', in W. D. Meurers and T. Kiss (eds.), Constraint-Based Approaches to Germanic Syntax, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 177–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappin, S., R. D. Levine, and D. E. Johnson: 2000, 'The Revolution Confused: A Response to Our Critics', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 873–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H.: 1999, 'On Feature Strength: Three Minimalist Approaches to Overt Movement', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M.: 1997, 'Object Extraction in Bantu Applicatives: Some Implications from Minimalism', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 252–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N.: 1998, 'The Principle of Minimal Compliance', Linguistic Inquiry 29, 599–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I.: 2000, 'Current Developments in Generative Grammar', Ampersand n.v., 5.

  • Sag, I. A.: 1997, 'English Relative Clause Constructions', Journal of Linguistics 33, 431–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriagereka, J.: 1998, Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction toMinimalist Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S.: 2001 (May 31), 'Can Science Explain Everything? Anything?', New York Review of Books.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lappin, S., Levine, R.D. & Johnson, D.E. The Revolution Maximally Confused. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19, 901–919 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013397516214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013397516214

Keywords

Navigation