Skip to main content
Log in

Snake Fear and the Pictorial Emotional Stroop Paradigm

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test a novel pictorial emotional Stroop paradigm that required participants to name the colors of filtered images on a computer screen. High (n = 20) and low (n = 20) snake-fearful participants color-named filters covering images of snakes (threat), cows (neutral), bunnies (positive), and blank screens. Each image appeared as if viewed through tinted sunglasses. The results revealed that both groups took longer to name the colors of filters covering bunnies as well as snakes relative to filters covering cows. Intensely snake-fearful individuals (n = 5), however, exhibited additional interference for snake pictures beyond that evoked by bunny pictures. Thus, pictorial cues having positive as well as negative emotional valence disproportionately captured attention. This paradigm shows promise as a nonlexical, ecologically valid approach to evaluating selective processing of emotional cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Kindt, M., & Brosschot, J. F. (1997). Phobia-related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 644–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, M., & Brosschot, J. F. (1999). Cognitive bias in spider-phobic children: Comparison of a pictorial and a linguistic spider Stroop. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klorman, R., Weerts, T. C., Hastings, J. E., Melamed, B. G., & Lang, P. J. (1974). Psychometric description of some specific fear questionnaires. Behavior Therapy, 5, 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Öhman, A., & Vaitl, D. (1988). The International Affective Picture System [Photographic Slides]. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, E., & van den Hout, M. (1993). Selective attention evidenced by pictorial and linguistic Stroop tasks. Behavior Therapy, 24, 645–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W., Clark, D. M., Ehlers, A., & Chen, Y.-P. (1999). Social anxiety and attention away from emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 673–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., Williams, R. M., & Clark, D. M. (1991). Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threatrelated information? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1998). Information-processing abnormalities in anxiety disorders: Implications for cognitive neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 479–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Kaspi, S. P., Riemann, B. C., & Zeitlin, S. B. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 398–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A. (1996). Preferential preattentive processing of threat in anxiety: Preparedness and attentional biases. In R.M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 253–290). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, B. C., & McNally, R. J. (1995). Cognitive processing of personally relevant information. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, B. S., Asmundson, G. J.G., & Wiese, K.C. (2000). Automatic and strategic processing of threat cues in patients with chronic pain: A modified Stroop evaluation. Clinical Journal of Pain, 16, 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, S. J., & Salkovskis, P.M. (1997). The effect of one-session treatment for spider phobia on attentional bias and beliefs. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Constantine, R., McNally, R.J. & Hornig, C.D. Snake Fear and the Pictorial Emotional Stroop Paradigm. Cognitive Therapy and Research 25, 757–764 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012923507617

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012923507617

Navigation