Skip to main content
Log in

Perfect presence: What does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments?

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the advantages of building a virtual reality system is that it allows students to enter new worlds which in these instances include trips to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean, a field visit to an Oak Wood and a close encounter in a 3D maze. In all these environments the factors affecting a sense of ‘being there’ or presence was investigated. Enhanced audio feedback increased a subjective sense of presence but did not increase students' conceptual learning scores. We have also found that a sense of social presence enhanced the notion of ‘being there’ together with measures of collaboration. However ‘being there’ can take its toll on students and our findings suggest it imposes a cognitive overload. Where students have a choice, they try and reduce this overload by asking for conceptual tools to assist them in their learning tasks. The studies reported in this paper provide some benchmark data about these issues which deserve further investigation if we are to design effective virtual environments for conceptual learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass, E.J., (1998). Towards an Intelligent Tutoring System for Situation Awareness Training in Complex, Dynamic Environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1452, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, ITS 198, San Antonio, Texas, USA, August 1998, pp 26-35.

  • Brna, P. (1999). Collaborative virtual learning environments for concept learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 9, Nos. 2/3/4, 315-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M., Brna, P. and Treasure-Jones, T. (1997). Splitting the Collaborative Atom: How to Support Learning About Collaboration. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems, du Boulay, B. and Mizoguchi, R. (eds) Amsterdam: IOS. pp 135-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelfs, A. and Whitelock, D. (1999). Activity Theory and Virtual Learning Environments: A lever to understanding the role of Presence. In Proceedings of the Sixth UK Virtual Reality Special Interest Group Conference. Edited by T. Fernando. Salford University, September. pp. 1-10.

  • Kalawsky, R.S. (1991a). Pilot integration and the implications on the design of advanced cockpits. In Conference on the Man-Machine Interface in Tactical Aircraft Design and Combat Automation, Agard, Stuttgart.

  • Kalawsky, R.S. (1991b). From visually coupled systems to virtual reality: an aerospace perspective. In Proceedings Computer Graphics '91, Blenheim On-line.

  • Kalawsky, R. (1993). The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as Theatre. Addison Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. (1997). At the Heart of it all: The Concept of Telepresence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2).

  • Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual Reality. Simon & Schuster, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, D.M. and Brna, P. (2000). ACTIVE World: Manipulating Time and Point of View to Promote a Sense of Presence in a Collaborative Virtual Environment for Training in Emergency Situations. 3rd International Workshop on Presence, Delft University of Technology, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, J. (1992). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, D. (1999). Investigating the role of task structure and interface support in two virtual learning environments. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 9, Nos. 2/3/4, 291-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, D., Brna, P. and Holland, S. (1996). What is the Value of Virtual Reality for Conceptual Learning? Towards a Theoretical Framework. In Brna, P., Paiva, A. and Self, J.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp 136-141, Edicoes Colibri, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Whitelock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitelock, D., Romano, D., Jelfs, A. et al. Perfect presence: What does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments?. Education and Information Technologies 5, 277–289 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012001523715

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012001523715

Navigation