Skip to main content
Log in

Population Biology and Growth of Ozark Cavefish in Logan Cave National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ozark cavefish, Amblyopsis rosae, is a threatened species endemic to the Springfield Plateau of the Ozark Highlands in Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. One of the largest known Ozark cavefish populations, located in Logan Cave, Arkansas, was surveyed 25 times over a two-year period between 1993 and 1995. During the study, 147 Ozark cavefish > 30 mm (TL) were marked with visual implant tags and 140 Ozark cavefish were available for recapture; 68 were recaptured 189 times and the rest (72) were never recaptured. Individual Ozark cavefish persisted in Logan Cave for a relatively short time. Only 14% of 80 fish tagged during a previous study in 1992 were recaptured during this study, and half of all recaptured fish disappeared within three months. However, if a fish persisted for at least seven months in the cave, its probability of being recaptured over an additional year was high. Maximum persistence of a tagged fish was 28 months, suggesting these fish have a maximum life-span of 4–5 years. Growth averaged 0.6 mm per month, with maximum recorded growth of 6 mm per month and a maximum size of 65 mm TL. Smaller fish grew faster than larger fish but growth rates were sporadic, with several mid-sized fish (45–49 mm) showing little growth (0–3 mm year-1) while some fish > 50 mm grew up to 12 mm year-1. Most fish gained in length during April–October, the same period a maternity colony of gray bats occupied the cave. Gross Ozark cavefish movement over the study period ranged up to 1002 m, with a mean movement of 1.2 m day-1; movement was positively correlated with Ozark cavefish total length. Death seemed the most likely explanation for loss of tagged Ozark cavefish, including fish that emigrated out of the cave. Little up-stream movement was recorded between reaches and did not account for loss of tagged fish. Reproduction within the cave and immigration from the aquifer accounted for persistence of Ozark cavefish in Logan Cave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bond, C.E. 1996. Biology of fishes. Harcort Brace, New York. 750 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, G.L. 1997. Metabolic rates and life history of aquatic organisms inhabiting Logan Cave stream in Northwest Arkansas. MS Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 98 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.Z. 1996. Population dynamicsand growth of Ozark cavefish in Logan Cave National Wildlife Refuge, Benton County, Arkansas. MS Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 105 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenmann, C.H. 1898. A new blind fish. Proc. IndianaAcad. Sci. 1897: 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, C.S., H.L. Blakenship & L.A. Nielsen. 1996. Tagging and markingpp. 353–383. In: B.R. Murphy & D.W. Willis (ed.) Fisheries Techniques, Amer. Fish. Soc., Bethesda.

  • Harvey, M.J. 1992. Bats of the eastern United States. Tennessee Tech. Univ., Cookeville. 22 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haw, F.,P.K. Bergman, R.D. Fralick, R.M. Buckley & H.L. Blankenship. 1990. Visible implant fish tag. pp. 311–316. In: N.C. Parker et al. (ed.) Fish-Marking Techniques, Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7, Bethesda.

  • Jegla, T.C. & T.L. Poulson. 1970. Circadian rhythms, I: reproduction in cave crayfish Orconectes pellucidus intermis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 33: 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J.E. 1987. Protected fishes of the United States andCanada. Amer. Fish. Soc., Bethesda. 42 pp.

  • Means, M.L. 1993. Population dynamics and movement of Ozarkcavefish in Logan Cave NWR, Benton County, Arkansas, with additional baseline water quality information. MS Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 126 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, M.L. & J.E. Johnson. 1995. Movement ofthreatened Ozark cavefish in Logan Cave National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas. Southwest. Nat. 40: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W.L. 1997. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Cons. Comm., Jefferson City. 371 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H., J.D. Nichols, C. Brownie & J.E. Hines. 1990. Statistical inference for catch-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monog. (107): 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. 1963. Cave adaptation in amblyopsidfishes. Amer. Midl. Nat. 70: 257–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, H.W. & T.M. Buchanan. 1988. Fishes ofArkansas. Univ. of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville. 536 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Booker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea & W. B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. Amer. Fish. Soc. Special Publ. (20): 1–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.D. & A.V. Brown. 1985.Distribution and habitat requirements of the Ozark cavefish, (Amblyopsis rosae). Amer. Midl. Nat. 114: 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, L.P. & R.F. Inger. 1957. The cave, spring, and swamp fishes of the family Amblyopsidae of thecentral and eastern United States. Amer. Midl. Nat. 58: 232–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatisticalanalysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 718 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, J.Z., Johnson, J.E. Population Biology and Growth of Ozark Cavefish in Logan Cave National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas. Environmental Biology of Fishes 62, 161–169 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011860821932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011860821932

Navigation