Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Well-Being in the Welfare State: Level Not Higher, Distribution Not More Equitable

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

Abstract

The terms well-being and welfare are Often bracketed together, especially well-being and state welfare. The level of well-being is believed to be higher in welfare states, and its distribution more equitable. This theory is tested here in a comparative study of 41 nations from 1980 to 1990. The size of state welfare is measured by social security expenditures. The well-being of citizens is measured in terms of the degree to which they lead healthy and happy lives.

Contrary to expectation, there appears to be no link between the size of the welfare state and the level of well-being within it. In countries with generous social security schemes, people are not healthier or happier than in equally affluent countries where the state is less open-handed. Increases or reductions in social security expenditure are not related to a rise or fall in the level of health and happiness either.

There also appears to be no connection between the size of state welfare and equality in well-being among citizens of the state. In countries where social security expenditure is high, the dispersion of health and happiness is not smaller than in equally prosperous countries with less social insurance spending. Again, increases and reductions in social security expenditure are not linked with equality in health and happiness among citizens.

This counterintuitive result raises five questions: (1) Is this really true? (2) If so, what could explain this lack of effect? (3) Why is it so difficult to believe this result? (4) How should this information affect social policy? (5) What can we learn from further research?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apples, A., H. Bosma, V. Graubauskas, A. Gostaukas, and F. Sturmans. (1996). “Self-Rated Health and Mortality in a Lithuanian and a Dutch Population.” Social Science and Medicine 42, 681–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, M., D. Blane, and S. Montgomery. (1997). “Health and the Life-Course: Why Safety Nets Matter.” British Medical Journal 314, 1194–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R., and W. Lauterbach. (1997). “Wohlfahrtsstaatentwicklung und Lebenserwartung in Ost-und Westdeutschland.” In R. Becker (ed.), Generationen und sozialer Wandel. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, pp. 199–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., E. Sandvik, L. Seidlitz, and M. Diener. (1993). “The Relationship Between Income and Subjective Wellbeing: Relative or Absolute?” Social Indicators Research 28, 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., and F. Fujita. (1997). “Social Comparisons and Subjective Wellbeing.” In B. Buunk and R. Gibbons (eds.), Healing, Coping and Wellbeing, Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 329–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSwaan, A. (1988). In Care of the State. Health Care, Education andWelfare in Europe and America. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiTella, G., R.J. Macculloch, and A.J. Oswald. (1997). The Macro-Economics of Happiness. Center for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper 19. Oxford: Institute of Economics and Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, E. (1984). The Social Progress of Nations. New York: Preager.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, P.C., and D.G. Richards. (1995). “Size of Public Sector and Economic Growth, OECD Countries 1965–85.” International Journal of Social Economy 22, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E.L., and Y. Benyamini. (1997). “Self-Assessed Health and Mortality. A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (1996). Cost of Social Security, 14th International Inquiry 1987–1989. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M.R., and R. Veenhoven. (2000). “Wealth and Happiness Revisited.” in preparation.

  • Headey, B., and A. Wearing. (1992). Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-Being. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., R.E. Goodin, R. Muffels, and H.J. Dirven. (1997). “Welfare Over Time: Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism in Panel Perspective.” Journal of Public Policy 17, 329–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, A. (1997). Cross-National Comparisons of Socio-Economic Differences in Mortality. Doctoral thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

  • LeGrand, J. (1987). “Inequalities in Health. Some International Comparisons.” European Economic Review 31, 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T.H. (1963). “Citizenship and Social Class.” In Sociology at the Crossroads and Other Essays. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G. (1984). Losing ground. American Social Policy 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouweneel, P. (2000). “State Welfare and Happiness of the Poor, A Cross Nation Comparison.” Erasmus University, in preparation.

  • Pfaller, A., I. Gough, and G. Therborn. (1991). Can the Welfare State Compete? London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, C. (1992). Beyond the Welfare State? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommer, E., and L. Ruitenberg. (1994). Profijt van de Overheid III. Den Haag: VUGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the Nest. Family Change and Decline in Modern Society. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNPD. (1996). Human Development Report 1996. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanMaarseveen, H. (1990). “De Verzekeringsstaat.” Nederlands Juristen Blad 1, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanOorschot, W.J., L. Rabusic, and T. Sirovatka. (1999). In preparation for Czech Journal of Sociology.

  • VanderVeen, R.J. (1990). De sociale grenzen van beleid. Een onderzoek naar de uitvoering en effecten van het stelsel van sociale zekerheid. Stenfert Kroeze, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderVeen, R.J. (1998). “Solidarity and Social Security: Effects of Decollectivisation in the Netherlands.” Sociale Wetenschappen 41, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of Happiness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1990). “Resultaat van de verzorgingsstaat: Leefbaarheid en gelijkheid.” In H. van de Braak (ed.), Rationaliteit en beleid: Hoofdstukken uit de Rotterdamse sociologie. De Lier: Academisch Boeken Centrum, pp. 41–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1992). “Social Equality and State-Welfare-Effort: More Income-Equality, no More Equality in Quality-of-Life.” Paper presented at the International Sociological Conference “Towards the Good Society,” June 25–26, 1992, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1993). “Happiness in Nations. Subjective Appreciation of Life in 56 Nations 1946–1992.” RISBO, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Update available http://www.eur.nl/ fsw/research/happiness/nations.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1994). “Is Happiness a Trait? Test of the Theory that a Better Society Does Not Make People Any Happier.” Social Indicators Research 34, 33–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1995). “The Cross-National Pattern of Happiness. Test of Predictions Implied in Three Theories of Happiness.” Social Indicators Research 34, 33–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996a). “Happy Life-Expectancy. A Comprehensive Measure of Quality-of-Life in Nations.” Social indicators Research 39, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996b). “The Study of Life-Satisfaction.” In W.E. Saris, R. Veenhoven, A.C. Scherpenzeel, and B. Bunting (eds.), A Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Life in Europe. Budapest: Eötvös University Press, pp. 11–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996c). “Developments in Satisfaction Research.” Social Indicators Research 37, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000a). “The Four Qualities of Life.” Journal of Happiness Studies 1 (in press).

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000b). “Freedom and Happiness. A Comparative Study in 41 Nations in the Early 1990's.” In E. Diener and E. Suh (eds.), Subjective Wellbeing across Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R., and P. Ouweneel. (1995). “Livability of the Welfare State: Appreciation-of-Life and Length-of-Life in Nations Varying in State-Welfare-Effort.” Social Indicators Research 36, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • WVS. (1994). World Values Survey 2 1990–92, Cumulative file. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR, file 6160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, POB 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Ruut Veenhoven

Authors
  1. Ruut Veenhoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veenhoven, R. Well-Being in the Welfare State: Level Not Higher, Distribution Not More Equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 2, 91–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010058615425

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010058615425

Search

Navigation