Skip to main content
Log in

Vegetation in Danish beech forests: the importance of soil, microclimate and management factors, evaluated by variation partitioning

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of management regime on floristic variation (mosses and vascular plants) in four Danish beech forests was investigated. Sixty-four blocks were sampled, representing beech stands of different age and management types. Nineteen potential explanatory variables were recorded and tested with Monte-Carlo tests and Canonical Correspondence Analysis. In addition results were evaluated by use of Detrended Correspondence Analysis. Explanatory variables were divided into three groups; soil, microclimatic and management parameters. The amount of variation explained by each group of variables was calculated by use of variation partitioning. The group consisting of management variables explained most variation, on local as well as regional scale. Management related variables explained more variation in vegetation than any other variables together. This indicates the importance of management as determining species composition in Danish beech forests. Management related variables explained most variation on local scale. On a regional scale, soil parameters explained the major part of the variation. The results suggest that thirty years without management are sufficient to change species composition significantly, as compared to managed forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barkham, J. P. & Norris, J. M. 1970. Multivariate Procedures in an Investigation of Vegetation and Soil Relations of Two Beech Woodlands, Cotswold Hills, England. Ecology 51(4): 630–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcard, D., Legendre, P., & Drapeau, P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73(3): 1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornebusch, C. H. 1920. Om Bedømmelse af Skovjordes Godhed ved Hjælp af Bundfloraen. Dansk Skovforenings Tidsskrift 5: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornebusch, C. H. 1923. Skovbundsstudier (Disquisitions on Flora and Soil of Danish woodlands). Det Forstlige Forsøgsvæsen i Danmark 8: 1–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornebusch, C. H. 1925. Skovbundsstudier (Disquisitions on Flora and Soil of Danish woodlands. Det Forstlige Forsøgsvæsen i Danmark 8: 181–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornebusch, C. H. 1929. Danmarks skovtyper. Acta Forestalia Fennica 34(11): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, N. C. 1990. The Nature and Properties of Soils (10th. ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajander, A. K. 1926. Theory of Forest Types. Acta Forestalia Fennica 29: 1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. S., Dunne, K. P. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1985. Responses of Forest Herbs to Canopy Gaps. Pp. 217–233. In: S. T. A. Pickett & P. S. White (eds), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. S. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1987. Influence of Canopy Opening on the Environment and Herb Layer in a Northern Hardwoods Forest. Vegetatio 70: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, M. F. V., Crundwell, A. C. Düll, R., Hill, M. O. and Smith, A. J. E. 1981. Mosses of Europe and the Azores; an Annotated List of Species, with Synonyms from the recent Literature. J. Bryol. 11(4): 609–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, M. 1994. Decidous Forest Vegetation in Boreo-nemoral Scandinavia. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 80: 1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. E. 1986. Disturbance Histories of Four Snowdonian Woodlands and Their Relation to Atlantic Bryophyte Distributions. Biol. Cons. 37: 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H. 1963. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. N. & Barkham, J. P. 1992. Coppicing and Natural Disturbance in TemperateWoodlands – a Review. Pp. 79–98. In: G. P. Buckley (ed.), Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falinski, J. B. 1986. Vegetation Dynamics in Temperate Lowland Primeval Forest. Ecological Studies in Bialowieza Forest. In Werger, M. J. A. (series editor), Geobotany 8.

  • Gauch, H. G. Jr. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. 1966. Problems in Forest Meteorology. Pp. 298–369. In: R. Geiger (ed.), The Climate near the Ground. Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEUS (Geologiske Undersøgelser), 1996. Jordartskort. 1: 25.000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J. G. & Hunt, R. 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology, A Funtional Approach to Common British Species. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, L. & Hallingbäck, Y. 1988. Bryophytes Flora and Vegetation of Managed and Virgin Coniferous Forest in South-West Sweden. Biol. Cons. 44: 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K. (ed.) 1981. Dansk feltflora. Gyldendal, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. H. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, H. A. 1988. Skoven og dens dyrkning. Nyt Nordisk Forlag, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermy, M. & Stieperaere, H. 1981. An Indirect Gradient Analysis of the Ecological Relationships between Ancient and Recent Riverine Woodlands to the South of Bruges (Flanders, Belgium). Vegetatio 44: 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. & Gauch, Jr. H. G. 1980. Detrended Correspondence Analysis: an Improved Ordination Technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, B. A. & Matt, D. R. 1977. The Distribution of Solar Microclimatic within a Deciduous Forest. Ecol. Monographs 47: 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, G. 1991. Temperate Deciduous Forests of Europe. Pp. 377–502. In: Röhrig B. & Ulrich, E. (eds), Temperate Deciduous Forests. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. F., & Van Tongeren, O. F. R. 1987. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Pudoc Wageningen, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, B. G. & Esseen, P. A. 1990. Treefall Disturbance Maintains High Bryophyte Diversity in a Boreal Spruce Forest. J. Ecol. 78: 924–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. J. 1988. Changes in the Ground Flora under Plantations on Ancient Woodland Sites. Forestry 61(4): 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Køie, M. 1979. Planternes Levevilkår. Pp. 151–246. In: Nørrevang, A. & Lundø, J. (eds) Danmarks Natur. Vol 2. Politikens forlag, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Køie, M. 1989. Forest and scrub. Opera Bot. 96: 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leps, J. & Hadincova, V. 1992. How Reliable are our Vegetation Analyses? J. Veg. Sci. 3(1): 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesica, P., McCune, B., Cooper, S.V., Hong, W. S. 1991. Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. Can. J. Bot. 69: 1745–1755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsky, J. 1974. The family Plagiotheciaceae in Denmark. Lindbergia 2: 185–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlack, G. R. 1994. Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge – trends in space and successional time. J. Ecol. 82: 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattews, J. D. 1991. Silvicultural Systems Oxford University Press.

  • Mayer, H. 1984. Wälder Europas. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J. A., Gadgil, M., Leveque, C., Padoch, C. & Redford, K. 1995. Human Influence on Biodiversity. In: Heywood, V. H. (ed.), Global Biodiversity Assessment. U.N. Environmental Program.

  • Miller, K., Allegretti, M. H., Johnson, N. & Jonsson, B. 1995. Measures for Biodiversity and Sustainable Use of its Components. In: Heywood, V. H. (ed.), Global Biodiversity Assessment. U.N. Environmental Program.

  • Mucina, L. & van der Maarel, E. 1989. Twenty Years of Numerical Syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, P. F. 1988. Naturskove i statsskovene. (Intern rapport. No. 4). Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelser.

  • Palmer, M. W. & Dixon, P. M. 1990. Small-scale Environmental Heterogeneity and the Analysis of Species Distributions along Gradients. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. W. 1990. Spatial Scale and Pattern of Species-Environment Relationship in Hardwood Forest of the North Carolina Piedmont. Coenoses 5(2): 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. W. 1993. Putting Things in Even Better Order: the Advantages of Canonical Correspondence Analysis. Ecology 74(8): 2215–2230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G. F. 1974. A Method for Assessing Woodland Flora for Conservation using Indicator Species. Biol. Cons. 6(4): 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G. F. 1981. Woodland Conservation and Management. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G. F. 1996. Natural Woodland, Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 522 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G. F. & Game, M. 1984. Historical Factors Affecting the Number and Distribution of Vascular Plant Species in the Woodlands of Central Lincolnshire. J. Ecol. 72: 155–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, P. M. 1994. Flora, Vegetation and Soil in Broad-leaved Ancient and PlantedWoodland and Scrub on Røsnæs, Denmark. Nord. J. Bot. 14(6): 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham, O. 1980. Ancient Woodland, its History, Vegetation and uses in England. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, R. J. & Bricker, B. D. 1992. Response of Five Deciduous Forest Herbs to Partial Canopy Removal and Patch Size. Am. Midland Nat. 127: 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R. A. Peet, R. K., Palmer, M. W. & White, P. S. 1993. Scale Dependence of Vegetation-Environment Correlations: A Case Study of a North Carolina Piedmont Woodland. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle, J. R. 1985. Disturbance Regimes in Temperate Forests. Pp. 17–33. In: S. T. A. Pickett & P. S. White (eds.), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics Academic Press, Inc, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röhrig, E. 1991. Vegetation Structure and Forest Succession. Pp. 35–49. In: E. Röhrig & B. Ulrich (eds.), Temperate Deciduous Forests Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, E. A. & Buckley G. P. 1992. Ground vegetation under planted mixtures of trees. Pp. 211–231. In: Cannell M. G. R. et al. (eds), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A. & Wilson, M. V. 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biog. 12: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilauer, P. 1992. CANODRAW User's guide, version 3.0. Ithaca, Microcomputer Power, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry (third ed.). W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydes, C. & Grime, J. P. 1981a. Effect of Tree Leaf Litter on Herbaceous Vegetation in Decidous Woodland I. J. Ecol. 69: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydes, C. & Grime, J. P. 1981b. Effect of Tree Leaf Litter on Herbaceous Vegetation in Deciduous Woodland II. J. Ecol. 69: 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, L. 1988. The Occurence of Epixylic Bryophyte and Lichen Species in an Old Natural and a Managed Forest Stand in Northeast Sweden. Biol. Cons. 45: 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988. CANOCO – a FORTRAN Program for Canonical Community Ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) Correspondence Analysis, Principal Component Analysis and Redundancy Analysis. Version 2.1. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. 1990. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.10.

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. 1991. CANOCO – a FORTRAN Program for Canonical Community Ordination by Partial Detrended Canonical Correspondence Analysis, Principal Component Analysis and Redundancy Analysis. Version 3.12. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpers, T. 1989. Changes inMicroclimate andVegetaion after Thinning in a Montane Virgin Forest. Phytocoenologia 17(1): 71–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warming, E. 1919. Skovene. Botanisk Tidsskrift 35(3): 1–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, R., & Neite, H. 1985. Acid Indicators around the Trunk Base of Fagus sylvatica in Limestone and Loess Beechwoods: Distribution Pattern and Phytosociological Problems. Vegetatio 64: 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, N. N. & Foster, D. R. 1988. Overstorey Composition and Age as Determinants of the Understorey Flora of Woods of Central New England. J. Ecol. 76: 867–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland, R. H. 1990. Vegetation Ecology: Theory, Methods and Applications with Reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia Supplement 1: 1–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland, R. H., & Eilertsen, O. 1994. Canonical Correspondence Analysis with Variation Partitioning: some Comments and an Application. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland, T. 1988. An Ecological Approach to the Investigation of a Beech Forest in Vestfold, SE Norway. Nord. J. Bot. 8(4): 375–407.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aude, E., Lawesson, J.E. Vegetation in Danish beech forests: the importance of soil, microclimate and management factors, evaluated by variation partitioning. Plant Ecology 134, 53–65 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009720206762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009720206762

Navigation