Skip to main content
Log in

The Prospects for Machine Discovery in Linguistics

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article reports the results from the developmentof four data-driven discovery systems, operating inlinguistics. The first mimics the induction methods ofJohn Stuart Mill, the second performs componentialanalysis of kinship vocabularies, the third is ageneral multi-class discrimination program, and thefourth finds logical patterns in data. These systemsare briefly described and some arguments are offeredin favour of machine linguistic discovery. Thearguments refer to the strength of machines incomputationally complex tasks, the guaranteedconsistency of machine results, the portability ofmachine methods to new tasks and domains, and thepotential machines provide for our gaining newinsights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cherry, C., M. Halle and R. Jakobson: 1953, Toward the Logical Description of Languages in their Phonemic Aspect. Language 29: 34-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: 1966, Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 58-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J.: 1983, Word Order Universals. N.Y.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N.: 1958, Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., H. Simon, P. Bradshaw and J. Zytkow: 1987, Scientific Discovery: Computational Investigation of the Creative Process. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, F.: 1964, The Structural Analysis of Kinship Semantics. In Horace Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists. Mouton: The Hague, 1073-1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: 1879, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and H. Simon: 1972, Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980a, Scientific Discovery I: Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980b, Scientific Discovery II: Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogle, L.: 1974, Method and Theory in Semantics and Cognition of Kinship Terminology. Mouton: The Hague and Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pericliev, V.: 1990, On Heuristic Procedures in Linguistics. Studia Linguistica 44: 59-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pericliev, V.: 1995, Empirical Discovery in Linguistics. In Working Notes of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium Series “Systematic Methods of Scientific Discovery”. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 68-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pericliev, V.: 1996, Machine Scientific Discovery and the Domain Sciences: Invited Response to “Computer Science Research in Scientific Discovery”. Knowledge Engineering Review 11: 67-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pericliev, V. and Raúl Valdés-Pérez: 1998a, A Discovery System for Componential Analysis of Kinship Terminologies. In B. Caron (ed.), Actes du 16è Congrès International des Linguistes (Paris, 20–25 juillet 1997). Published by Pergamon/Elsevier on CD-ROM.

  • Pericliev, V. and Raúl Valdés-Pérez: 1998b, A Procedure for Multi-class Discrimination and Some Linguistic Applications. In COLING, Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (August 10–14), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1036-1042.

  • Pericliev, V. and Raúl Valdés-Pérez: 1998c, Automatic Componential Analysis of Kinship Vocabularies with a Proposed Structural Solution to the Problem of Multiple Models. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 272-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrager, J. and P. Langley (eds.): 1990, Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés-Pérez, R. and V. Pericliev: 1997, Maximally Parsimonious Discrimination: A Task from Linguistic Discovery. In Proceedings of the 14th US National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI97. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 515-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés-Pérez, R. and V. Pericliev: 1999, Computer Enumeration of Significant Universals of Kinship Terminology. Cross-Cultural Research 33: 162-174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pericliev, V. The Prospects for Machine Discovery in Linguistics. Foundations of Science 4, 463–482 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009699902524

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009699902524

Navigation