Abstract
Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), as a tool for analyzing written texts, is particularly appropriate for analyzing argumentative texts. The distinction that RST makes between the part of a text that realizes the primary goal of the writer, termed nucleus, and the part that provides supplementary material, termed satellite, is crucial for the analysis of argumentative texts.
The paper commences by determining the concept of argument relation (argument + conclusion) and by briefly presenting RST. It continues by identifying five of RST's rhetorical relations of the satellite/nucleus schema (Evidence, Motivation, Justify, Antithesis, Concession) as five argument relations, each being, logically or pragmatically, a special kind of argument: Evidence being a supportive argument, Motivation an incentive argument, Justify a justifier argument, and Antithesis and Concession persuader arguments. To illustrate, an analysis of three short texts concludes the paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abelen, E., G. Redeker and S. A. Thompson: 1993, 'The Rhetorical Structure of U.S.-American and Dutch Fund-Raising Letters', TEXT 13, 323–350.
Azar, M.: 1995, 'Argumentative texts in newspapers', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. H. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSU Conference on Argumentation, University of Amsterdam, June 21–24, SicSat, Amsterdam, vol. 3, pp. 493–500.
Azar, M.: 1997. 'Concession Relations as Argumentation', TEXT 17, 301–316.
Barton, E. L.: 1995, 'Contrastive and Non-contrastive Connectives Metadiscourse Functions in Argumentation', Written Communication 12, 219–239.
Blair, A. J.: 1992, 'Everyday Argumentation from an Informal Logic Perspective', in W. L. Benoit, D. Hample and P. J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation, Foris, Berlin-New York, pp. 357–378.
Brassart, D. G.: 1996a, 'Didactique de l'argumentation écrite: Approches psycho-cognitives', Argumentation 10, 69–87.
Brassart, D. G.: 1996b, 'Does a Prototypical Argumentative Schema Exist? Text Recall in 8 to 13 Years Olds', Argumentation 10, 163–174.
Brockriede, W.: 1990, 'Where is Argument?', in R. Trapp and J. Schuetz (eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation, Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, pp. 4–8.
Chittleborough, P. and M. E. Newman: 1993, 'Defining the Term “Argument”', Informal Logic 15, 189–207.
Connor, U and J. Lauer: 1985, 'Understanding Persuasive Essay Writing: Linguistic/Rhetorical Approach', TEXT 5, 309–326.
Crosswhite, J.: 1996, The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Ducrot, O.: 1992, 'Argumentation et persuasion', in W. De Mulder, F. Schuerewegen and L. Tasmowski (eds.), Enonciation et parti pris, Actes du colloque de l'Université d'Anvers (5, 6, 7 Fevrier 1990), Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 143–158.
van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst and T. Kruiger: 1987, Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies, Foris, Dordrecht.
Elhadad, M.: 1995, 'Using Argumentation in Text Generation', Journal of Pragmatics 24, 189–220.
Fox, B.: 1987, Discourse Structure and Anaphora in Written and Conversational English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Golder, C. and P. Coirier: 1996, 'The Production and Recognition of Typological Argumentative Text Markers', Argumentation, 10, 271–282.
Grize, J.-B.: 1981, 'L'argumentation: explication ou séduction', in L'argumentation, Presses universitaires de Lyon, Lyon, pp. 29–40.
Hovy, E. E.: 1991, 'Approaches to the Planning of Coherent Text', in C. Paris and W. Swartout (eds.), Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 83–102.
Knott, A.: 1991, New Strategies and Constraints in RST-Based Text Planning, Ms.C. Thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.
Linden, K., S. Cumming and J. Martin: 1992, 'Using System Networks to Build Rhetorical Structures', in Proceedings, Sixth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Mann, W. C. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen: 1991, 'Functions of Language in Two Frameworks', Word 42, 231–250.
Mann, W. C., C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and S. A. Thompson: 1992, 'Rhetorical Structure Theory and Text Analysis', in W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fun-Raising Text, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 39–78.
Mann, W. C. and A. Thompson: 1986, 'Relational Propositions in Discourse', Discourse Processes 9, 57–90.
Mann, W. and S. Thompson: 1987, 'Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of Text Structure', in G. Kempen (ed.), Natural Language Generation, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 85–96.
Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson: 1988, 'Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization', TEXT 8, 243–281.
Martin, J. R.: 1992, English Text — System and Structure, John Benjamin Publishing Co., Philadelphia-Amsterdam.
Matthiessen, C. and S. A. Thompson: 1988. 'The Structure of Discourse and Subordination', in J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Clause Combing in Grammar and Discourse, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 275–330.
Moore, J. D. and C. L. Paris: 1993, 'Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing Intentional and Rhetorical Information', Computational Linguistics 19, 651–694.
Moore, J. D. and M. E. Pollack: 1992, 'A Problem for RST: The Need for Multi-Level Discourse Analysis', Computational Linguistics 18, 537–544.
O'Brient, T.: 1995, 'Rhetorical Structure Analysis and the Case of Inaccurate, Incoherent Source-Hopper', Applied Linguistics 16, 442–482.
Perelman, C.: 1982, The Realm of Rhetoric, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame.
Robrieux, J-J.: 1993, Eléments de rhétorique et d'argumentation, Dunod, Paris.
Rosner, D. and M. Stede: 1992, 'Customizing RST for the Automatic Production of Technical Manuals', in Proceedings, Sixth International Workshop on Natural Language Geneneration, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp. 199–215.
Thompson, S. A. and W. C. Mann: 1987, 'Antithesis: A Study in Clause Combining and Discourse Structure', in R. Steele and T. Threadgold (eds.), Language Topics, Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, John Benjamins B.V., Amsterdam, vol. 2, pp. 359–379.
Toulmin, Stephen: 1969, The Use of Argument, Cambridge University Press [1st edn. 1958].
Wyatt, R. O. and D. P. Badger: 1993, 'A New Typology for Journalism and Mass Communication Writing', Journalism Educator 48, 3–1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Azar, M. Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation 13, 97–114 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007794409860
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007794409860