Skip to main content
Log in

Division of labor and resource management in eastern Pará, Brazil

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peasants of the northeastern Pará cultivate cassava (manioc esculenta) using shifting cultivation. This paper discusses some factors in support of cassava production, even though it has some negative environmental impacts. These factors are the importance of cassava in the region's history, dietary traditions, and the cooperative labor systems employed in its cultivation and processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque, M. and H. Cardoso (1980). A mandioca no trópico úmido. Brasilia: Editerra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alier, J. M. (1994). De la economia ecológica al ecologismo popular. Barcelona: Icaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, M. W. B. (1986). “Redescobrindo af família rural,” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 1(1): 66-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. and K. Vergopoulos (1977). A questão agrária e o capitalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldus, H. (1974). Ensaios de etnologia Brasileira. S. Paulo: Ed. Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, P. F. (1993). American Dreams. Rural Realities. Family Farms in Crisis. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhorst, J. (1988). The Mythology of South America. New York: Quill William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1970). Woman's Role in Economic Development. New York: St. Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumberg, R. L. (ed.) (1991). Gender, Family and Economy. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S. G. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon. Extraction, Unequal Exchange and the failure of the Modern State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayanov, A. (1974). La organización de la unidad economica campesina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Nueva Visión.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christanty, L. (1986). “Shifting cultivation and tropical soils: Patterns, problems, and possible improvements,” in G. G. Marten (ed.), Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia: A Human Ecology Perspective. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). “Social capital in the creation of human capital,” American Journal of Sociology 94(special supplement): 95-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counihan, Carole and V. Penny. (1997). Food and Culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1968). A divisão do trabalho social. Sao Paolo: Martins Fontes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrenberg, E. P. (1984). Chayanov, Peasant, and Economic Anthropology. Iowa: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Égler, E. G. (1961). “A zona Bragantina do estado do Pará,” Revista Brasileira de Geografia 23: 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1993). Peasant Economics. Farm Households and Agrarian Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiddes, N. (1992). Meat: A Natural Symbol. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C. B. (1990). “Social capital and sustainability: Agriculture and communities in the great plains and the corn belt,” Research in Rural Sociology and Development: A Research Annual 6: 227-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J. (ed.) (1995). A 2020 Vision for Food Agriculture, and the Environment in Latin America. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1982). Cooking, Cuisine and Class. A Study in Comparative Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandstaff, T. B. (1981). “Shifting cultivation,” Ceres 4: 28-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1970). The Raw and the Cooked. London: Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, J. S. (1991). Os camponeses e a política no Brasil. Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E. F. (1990). A ecologia humana das populações da Amazônia. Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993). Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penteado, A. R. (1977). Problemas de colonização e de uso da terra na região Bragantina do estado do Pará, Belém. UFPA.

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). “The prosperous community: Social capital and public life,” The American Prospect 13: 35-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sach, I. (1993). “Ëstratégias de transição para o século XXI,” in M. Bursztyn (org.), Pensar o desenvolvimento sustentável. S. Paulo: Brasiliense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanches, P. A. (1991). “Alternatives to slash-and-burn: A pragmatic approach to mitigate tropical deforestation.” Paper presented at the Conference on Agricultural Technology for Sustainable Economic Development in the New Century: Policy Issues for the International Community, World Bank, Airlaie, Virginia, October 23, 1991.

  • Seott, J. (1979). The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, A. B. (1959). Contribuição do estudo do folclore Amazonico na zona Bragantina. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. Belém Pará.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigo, E. J. (1995). Agriculture. Technological Change, and Environment in Latin America. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia, C. (1992) (ed.) Sustainable Crop-Livestock Systems for three Bolivian Highlands. Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ximenes, T. (1983). “Reapropriação da Ciência pelo Povo,” in Hébete (org.). Ciência e tecnologia para a Amazônia. Belém: UFPA/NAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ximenes, T. (1985). Mutirão campo e cidade. Tesis de Doutorado. Escola de Sociologia e Politica de São Paulo.

  • Ximenes, T. (1995). “A insubstituivel Mandioca,” in Ciência Hoje. SBPC. 17: 100.

  • Ximenes, T. (org.) (1997). Perspectiva do desenvolvimento sustentável. Uma contribuição para a Amazônia 21. Belém: UFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ximenes, T. (1998). “Cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: Controversy between economic, environmental and cultural interest.” Paper presented at 30th Annual International Conference of the Community Development Society. Kansas City, Missouri.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ximenes, T. Division of labor and resource management in eastern Pará, Brazil. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 49–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007673200152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007673200152

Navigation