Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moral Realism and the Argument from Disagreement

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Boyd, R.N. (1979): ‘Metaphor and Theory Change: What is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor for?’, in A. Orotney (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R.N. (1988): ‘How to be a Moral Realist’, in Sayre-McCord, pp. 181–228.

  • Brandt, R.B. (1950): Ethical Theory, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D.O. (1984): ‘Moral Realism and the Skeptical Arguments from Disagreement and Queerness’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 111–125; reprinted in Louis Pojman, Ethical Theory. Belmont, Wadsworth Publishing Co, 1989. (Page references are to Pojman.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D.O. (1989): Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A.C. (1953): Ethics, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. (1985): ‘Punishment and Dignity in China’, in D. J. Munro (ed.), Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, D. (1995): ‘Full-Information Theories of Individual Good’, Social Theory and Practice 21, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. (1977): Ethics, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.W. (1985): ‘Ways of Moral Learning’, Philosophical Review 94, 507–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, D.J. (ed.) (1985): Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975): ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning’’, reprinted in Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Railton, P. (1986a): ‘Moral Realism’, Philosophical Review 9, 163–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (1986b): ‘Facts and Values’, Philosophical Topics 14, 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord, G. (1988): Essays on Moral Realism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer-Landau, R. (1994): ‘Ethical Disagreement, Ethical Objectivism and Moral Indeterminacy’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer-Landau, R. (1995): ‘Vagueness, Borderline Cases and Moral Realism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 32, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, N. (1985): ‘Moral Explanations’, in D. Copp and D. Zimmerman (eds.), Morality, Reason and Truth, pp. 49–78, Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld; reprinted in Sayre-McCord, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, M. (1990): ‘On the Epistemic Status of Considered Moral Judgments’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 Sup., 97–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, 05401-3404, USA

    D. Loeb

Authors
  1. D. Loeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loeb, D. Moral Realism and the Argument from Disagreement. Philosophical Studies 90, 281–303 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004267726440

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004267726440

Keywords

Search

Navigation