Skip to main content
Log in

Floral initiation in field-grown forage peas is delayed to a greater extent by short photoperiods, than in other types of European varieties

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frost is one of the main climatic stresses which has to be overcome by a winter pea crop. Some forage lines show a delayed floral initiation, which helps them to escape the main winter freezing periods, as a higher susceptibility to frost is observed after floral initiation commences. Frost tolerant forage peas have been used in all winter pea breeding programs in France and our main purpose was to evaluate to what extent those lines and the current winter varieties are variable for the date of floral initiation in field conditions. A field experiment was carried out during two years at the INRA experimental station of Mons (northern France). Different genotypes (9 in 1995–1996 and 12 in 1996–1997) were sown at approximately monthly intervals between September and June to provide a range of photothermal conditions. The date of floral initiation was determined by destructive sampling. We observed variability for the date of floral initiation among the different genotypes and sowing dates. Our data particularly highlighted the different reactions to photoperiod. Three varieties had no detectable reaction. Six varieties exhibited a quantitative response, with varied intensities. Lastly, the three forage varieties showed a qualitative, high response to photoperiod, which indicated the presence of the Hr allele, already described in Pisum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eteve, G. & M. Derieux, 1982. Variabilité de la durée de la phase végétative chez le Pois (Pisum sativum L.). Application à la sélection de types résistants à l'hiver et à la détermination de la date de semis. Agronomie 2: 813–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masle, J., G. Doussinault & B. Sun, 1989. Response of wheat genotypes to temperature and photoperiod in natural conditions. Crop Sci 29: 715–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murfet, I.C., 1971. Flowering in Pisum. Three distinct phenotypic classes determined by the interaction of a dominant early and a dominant late gene. Heredity 26: 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfet, I.C., 1973. Flowering in Pisum. Hr, a gene for high response to photoperiod. Heredity 31: 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfet, I.C., 1975. Flowering in Pisum. Multiple alleles at the lf locus. Heredity 35: 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfet, I.C., 1981. The likely flowering genotype for several cultivars and mutants. Pisum Newsletter 13: 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfet, I.C. & J.B. Reid, 1985. The control of flowering and internode length in Pisum. In P.D. Hebblethwaite, M.C. Heath & T.C.K. Dawkins (Eds.), The pea crop: a basis for improvement, pp. 67–80. Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfet, I.C. & J.B. Reid, 1993. Developmental mutants. In R. Casey & D.R. Davies (Eds.), Peas: genetics, molecular biology and biotechnology, pp. 165–216. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ney, B. & O. Turc, 1993. Heat-unit-based description of the reproductive development of pea. Crop Sci 33: 510–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, D.M., 1968. Photoperiodic and temperature control of flower initiation in the late pea cultivar Greenfeast. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 21: 609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J.B. & I.C. Murfet, 1977. Flowering in Pisum. The effect of genotype, plant age, photoperiod and number of inductive cycles. Journal of Experimental Botany 28: 811–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steponkus, P.L., 1978. Cold hardiness and freezing injury of agronomic crops. Adv. Agron. 30: 51–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield, R.J. & E.H. Roberts, 1988. Photothermal regulation of flowering in pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea. In R.J. Summerfield (Ed.), World crops: cool season food legumes, pp. 911–922. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D.H. & W. Yan, 1998. Prediction of phenology by the genotype × photoperiod × temperature interaction model. In D.H. Wallace & W. Yan (Eds.), Plant breeding and wholesystem crop physiology. Improving adaptation, maturity and yield, pp. 78–98. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wery, J., O. Turc, & J. Lecoeur, 1993. Mechanisms of resistance to cold, heat and drought in cool season legumes, with special reference to chickpea and pea. In K.B. Singh & M.C. Saxena (Eds.), Breeding for stress tolerance in cool season food legumes, pp. 271–291. John Wiley & sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lejeune-Hénaut, I., Bourion, V., Etévé, G. et al. Floral initiation in field-grown forage peas is delayed to a greater extent by short photoperiods, than in other types of European varieties. Euphytica 109, 201–211 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003727324475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003727324475

Navigation