Skip to main content
Log in

Gender disparities in colorectal cancer screening: True or false?

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

To date, nearly all studies examining gender disparities in colorectal cancer screening report a lower endoscopic screening rate in women. Using a statewide claims database, gender differences in screening rates were analyzed in an attempt to validate gender disparities reported in prior survey-based studies. Procedural-level dataset containing all patient encounters for 2003 in which a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy were performed was created. Procedures were selected using CPT codes and univariate analysis was performed using SAS v 8.0. Statewide for average-risk individuals 50 years or older, 65,232 endoscopic procedures were performed in 2003. The majority (83%) of endoscopic screening procedures were colonoscopies. Overall, the rate of screening in average-risk women 50 years or older (38 procedures/1000 people) was slightly lower than in men (42/1000) but not statistically significant. The rates of screening were higher in women before the age of 60 years and lower after the age of 60 years. No clinically significant difference was found in the type of screening procedure performed. Gender disparities in rates and types of colorectal cancer screening reported in prior survey studies are not validated in this patient encounter data study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2005. American Cancer Society, 2005.

  2. Swaroop VS, Larson MV. Colonoscopy as a screening test for colorectal cancer in average-risk individuals. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:951–956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Sonnenberg A. ACG Recommendations on colorectal cancer screening for average and higher risk patients in clinical practice, April 2000. Am Coll Gastroenterol, 2000.

  4. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale—Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. American Cancer Society. ACS cancer detection guidelines. American Cancer Society, 2004, 4-11-0005. www.cancer.org.

  6. Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, Chattopadhyay SK, Nadel MR, Tangka FK, Molinari NA. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 2004;127:1661–1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao RS, Graubard BI, Breen N, Gastwirth JL. Understanding the factors underlying disparities in cancer screening rates using the Peters-Belson approach: Results from the 1998 National Health Interview Survey. Med Care 2004;42:789–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Straus WL, Mansley EC, Gold KF, Wang Q, Reddy P, Pashos CL. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices in the general population: A risk-adjusted survey. J Public Health Manage Pract 2005;11:244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chao A, Connell CJ, Cokkinides V, Jacobs EJ, Calle EE, Thun MJ. Underuse of screening sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in a large cohort of US adults. Am J Public Health 2004;94:1775–1781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawley ST, Vernon SW, Levin B, Vallejo B. Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening in a large medical organization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevent 2004;13:314–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Etzioni DA, Ponce NA, Babey SH, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Ko CY, et al. A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2004;101:2523–2532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farraye FA, Wong M, Hurwitz S, Puleo E, Emmons K, Wallace MB, Fletcher RH. Barriers to endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: Are women different than men? Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:341–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bressler B, Lo C, Amar J, Whittaker S, Chaun H, Halparin L, Enns R. Prospective evaluation of screening colonoscopy: Who is being screened? Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:921–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Slattery ML, Kinney AY, Levin TR. Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a population-based study: The impact of gender, health care source, and time. Prev Med 2004;38:276–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Turner B, Myers RE, Hyslop T, Hauck WW, Weinberg D, Brigham T, et al. Physician and patient factors associated with ordering a colon evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:357–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2581–2586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380 (erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2000;343:1204). N Engl J Med 2000;343:162–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ker TS, Wasserberg N, Beart RW Jr. Colonoscopic perforation and bleeding of the colon can be treated safely without surgery. Am Surg 2004;70:922–924.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, Majak BM, Vatn MH. Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as a screening modality for colorectal adenomas in older age groups? Findings in a cohort of the normal population aged 63–72 years. Gut 1999;45:834–839.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, Leya J, Metz A, Sontag SJ. New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1524–1529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harewood GC, Lieberman DA. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:72–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehran A, Jaffe P, Efron J, Vernava A, Liberman A. Screening colonoscopy in the asymptomatic 50- to 59-year-old population (erratum appears in Surg Endosc 2004;18:353 [Vernavay A corrected to Vernava A]). Surg Endosc 2003;17:1974–1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gorard DA, McIntyre AS. Completion rate to caecum as a quality measure of colonoscopy in a district general hospital. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:243–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Callcut, R.A., Kaufman, S., Stone-Newsom, R. et al. Gender disparities in colorectal cancer screening: True or false?. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 1409–1417 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.06.006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.06.006

Key words

Navigation