Skip to main content
Log in

The Sound Suppression Characteristics of Wing Feather of Owl (Bubo bubo)

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many species of owls are able to fly noiselessly, and their wing feathers play an important role for the silent flight. In this paper, we studied the sound suppression mechanism of the eagle owl (Bubo bubo) by Stereo Microscope (SM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (LSCM). To investigate the effects of special characteristics of wing feather on owl silent flight, the acoustic properties, including the sound absorption coefficient and flight noise, were compared between the eagle owl and common buzzard (Buteo buteo). The results show that the eagle owl generates lower noise than common buzzard during flight, and its wing feather has better sound absorption properties. The leading edge serration and trailing edge fringe can improve the pressure fluctuation of turbulence boundary, and suppress the generation of vortex sound. The elongated distal barbules form a multi-layer grid porous structure which also has an effect on sound absorption. This research not only can give the inspiration for solving the aerodynamic noise of aircraft and engineering machine, but also can provide a new idea for the design of low-noise devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lilley G M. A study of the silent flight of the owl. AIAA paper, 1998, AIAA-1998-2340.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gruschka H D, Borchers I U, Coble J G. Aerodynamic noise produced by a gliding owl. Nature, 1971, 233, 409–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kroeger R A, Grushka H D, Helvey T C. Low Speed AeroDynamics for Ultra-Quiet Flight, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-71-75, Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neuhaus W, Bretting H, Schweizer B. Morphologische und funktionelle Untersuchungen über den “lautlosen” Flug der Eulen (Strix aluco) im Vergleich zum Flug der Enten (Anas platyrhynchos). Biologisches Zentralblatt, 1973, 92, 495–512. (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geyer T, Sarradj E, Fritzsche C. Silent owl flight: Experiments in the aeroacoustic wind tunnel. The NAG/DAGA 2009 International Conference on Acoustics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sarradj E, Fritzsche C, Geyer T. Silent owl flight, bird flyover noise measurements. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49, 769–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham R R. The silent flight of owls. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 1934, 38, 837–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sick H. Morphologisch-funktionelle Untersuchungen über die Feinstruktur der Vogelfeder. Journal für Ornithologie, 1937, 85, 206–372. (in German)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bachmann T, Klän S, Baumgartner W, Klaas M, Schröder W, Wagner H. Morphometric characterisation of wing feathers of the barn owl Tyto alba pratincola and the pigeon Columba livia. Frontiers in Zoology, 2007, 4, 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachmann T, Wagner H. The three-dimensional shape of serrations at barn owl wings, towards a typical natural serration as a role model for biomimetic applications. Journal of Anatomy, 2011, 219, 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren L Q, Liang Y H. Biological couplings, Classification and characteristic rules. Science in China E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52, 2791–2800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun S M, Ren L Q, Xun C Y. Research on coupling sound absorption property of owl skin and feather. Noise and Vibration Control, 2008, 6, 119–123. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu T S, Kuykendoll K, Rhew R, Jones S. Avian wings. AIAA Paper, 2004, AIAA-2004-2186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Soderman P T. Leading-Edge Serrations which Reduce the Noise of Low-Speed Rotors, NASA Technical Report, NASA TN D-7371, USA, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vad J, Koscsó G, Gutermuth M, Kasza Z, Tábi T, Csörgő T. Study of the aero-acoustic and aerodynamic effects of soft coating upon airfoil. JSME International Journal C, 2006, 49, 648–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinichiro I T O. Aerodynamic influence of leading edge serrations on an airfoil in a low Reynolds number. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, 2009, 4, 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herr M, Dobrzynski W. Experimental investigations in low-noise trailing-edge design. AIAA Journal, 2005, 43, 1167–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Geyer T, Sarradj E, Fritzsche C. Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 48, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongxiu Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, K., Liu, Q., Liao, G. et al. The Sound Suppression Characteristics of Wing Feather of Owl (Bubo bubo). J Bionic Eng 9, 192–199 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60109-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60109-1

Keywords

Navigation