Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urban policy in Asia Pacific countries: a case for inclusionary zoning and housing

  • Perspectives on Spatial Dynamics: Cities, Culture and Environment
  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 April 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to address the key issues of spatial exclusion of the urban poor, including slum-dwellers through the mechanisms of ‘inclusionary zoning’ and ‘inclusionary housing’ to augment affordable housing in developing countries of the Asia–Pacific, with particular focus on India. These instruments aim at promoting affordable housing through the market place based on a system of incentives to developers. The motivation of the study stems from the realization that the biggest bottleneck in providing affordable housing to the urban poor is the lack of supply of suitable, litigation-free, and adequately serviced urban land located at a reasonable commuting distance from their workplaces. The paper reviews international best practices, and explores their underpinning theories, and proposes innovative ways to promote inclusion of the urban poor in planned urban development process. Major findings suggest that inclusionary zoning and housing programmes can be designed combining both efficiency and equity objectives. Inclusion works when rooted in the processes of urban land and housing markets and the urban planning system to correct for market failure. Policy-makers and planners may consider planned urban development as a process of value creation through the market, giving ample scope for value capture and recycling to promote inclusive urbanization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 28 April 2017

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

  • Calavita N, Mallach A (eds) (2010) Inclusionary housing in international perspective: affordable housing, social inclusion and land value recapture. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Census of India (2011) Office of the registrar general and census commissioner. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhi Development Authority (2015) Master plan for Delhi-2021

  • Darshini M, Joshi R, Sharma R (2009) Approaches to the lands for the urban poor, India. Centre for Urban Equity, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans J, King S, Stonecash R, Byford M, Libich J, Gregory Mankiw N (2015) Principles of economics, 7th edn. South Western Publications, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey R, Sturtevant L, Thaden E (2014) Achieving lasting affordability through inclusionary housing. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • High Powered Expert Committee (HPEC) (2011) Report on Indian urban infrastructure and services. New Delhi

  • Jacobus R (2015) Inclusionary housing (a policy focus report): creating and maintaining equitable communities. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi R, Sanga P (2009) Land reservations for the urban poor: the case of town planning schemes in Ahmedabad. Centre for Urban Equity, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge AI, Kanbur R, Mohanty PK (2014) Urbanization in India: challenges, opportunities and the way forward. Sage, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontokosta CE (2013) Mixed income housing and neighbourhood integration: evidence from inclusionary zoning programs. J Urban Aff 36(4):716–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontokosta CE (2015) Do inclusionary zoning policies equitably disperse affordable housing? A Comparative Spatial Analysis. J Housing Built Environ 30:569–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallach A (1984) Inclusionary housing programs: policies and practices. Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute (2010) India’s urban awakening: building inclusive cities, sustaining economic growth. McKinsey and Company

  • Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation (MoHUPA), Government of India (2010) Report of the committee on slum statistics/census. National Buildings Organisation (NBO), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation (MoHUPA), Government of India (2012) Report of the technical group on estimation of urban housing shortage. National Buildings Organisation (NBO), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) (2015) Notification dt.13 July 2015 on transit-oriented development policy for Delhi

  • Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), Government of India (2013) Notification dt.5 September 2013: Delhi land pooling policy

  • Mohanty PK (2014) Cities and public policy: an urban agenda for India. Sage, New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty PK (2016) Financing cities in india: municipal reforms, fiscal accountability and urban infrastructure. Sage, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission, Government of India (2008) Eleventh five year plan 2007–2012. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon SF (2011) The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: new evidence and possible explanations. Stanford University

  • Renewal SA (2013) Delivering an inspiring urban future. Annual Report. Government of South Australia

  • Rothwell J (2012) Housing costs, zoning, and access to high scoring schools. Metro Policy Program at Brookings

  • Rumberger RW, Palardy GJ (2005) Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teach Coll Record 107(9):1999–2045

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz H (2012) Housing policy is school policy: economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. In: Kahlenberg RD (ed) The future of school integration: socioeconomic diversity as an education reform strategy. Century Foundation Press, New York, pp 27–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz HL, Ecola L, Leuschner KJ, Kofner A (2012) Is inclusionary zoning inclusionary? RAND Corporation Technical Report Series

  • Spiller M, Anderson-Oliver M (2015) Revisiting the economics of inclusionary zoning. SGS Economics and Planning Occasional Paper

  • United Nations (2015) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2015) The state of Asian and Pacific cities. UNESCAP, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Human Settlement Management Institute (HSMI)-Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), Government of India for funding support to undertake research under the HUDCO Chair programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alok Kumar Mishra.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: Inadvertently the Figure 1 was not included and it has been inserted in this article.

An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-017-0033-5.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, A.K., Mohanty, P.K. Urban policy in Asia Pacific countries: a case for inclusionary zoning and housing. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci 1, 191–215 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-017-0026-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-017-0026-4

Keywords

JEL codes

Navigation