Abstract
Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are embedded in fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) composites material to achieve properties like higher toughness, shape morphing, variable stiffness etc. Pseudoelastic SMAs are mostly used in improving the energy absorbing capability of composites subjected to impact loading. Pseudoelastic SMA material has the property of absorbing higher strain energy without failure as compared to other engineering materials. Embedding SMA in FRP composites may affect its in-plane properties. This paper deals with study on SMA hybrid GFRP (Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic) composites to find out the effect of embedding SMA in composites on the mechanical properties such as longitudinal tensile and compressive strength, transverse tensile strength and compressive strength and in-plane shear strength. Experimental results show that longitudinal compressive strength of shape memory alloy hybrid composites (SMAHCs) increases by approximately 30% over pristine composites. There is a marginal change in values of longitudinal tensile strength and in-plane shear strength in SMAHCs as compared to pristine composites whereas there is reduction observed in transverse tensile and compressive strength in SMA hybrid GFRP composites as compared to pristine GFRP composites.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anand Anoop, Harshe Rahul, Joshi Makarand (2013) Resin film infusion: towards structural composites with nanofillers. J Appl Polym Sci. doi:10.1002/app.38855
Angioni SL, Meo M, Foreman A (2011) Impact damage resistance and damage suppression properties of shape memory alloys in hybrid composites—a review. Smart Mater Struct 20:013001
Aurrekoetxea J, Zurbitu J, de Mendibil IO, Agirregomezkorta A, Sánchez-Soto M, Sarrionandia M (2011) Effect of superelastic shape memory alloy wires on the impact behavior of carbon fiber reinforced in situ polymerized poly(butylene terephthalate) composites. Mater Lett 65(863):865
Burton DS, Gao X, Brison LC (2006) Finite element simulation of self healing shape memory alloy composite. Mech Mater 38:525–537
Farooq U, Gregory K (2010) Explicit dynamic simulation of drop weight low velocity impact on carbon fibrous composite panels. ARP J Eng Appl Sci 5(3):50–61
Gao X, Burton D, Turner TL, Brison LC (2006) Finite Element Analysis of adaptive stiffening and shape control SMA hybrid composite”. J Eng Mater Technol 128:285–293
Hebda DA, Whitlock ME, Ditman JB, White SR (1995) Manufacturing of adaptive graphite/epoxy structures with embedded nitinol wires. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 6:220–228
Kang Ki-Weon, Kim JK (2009) Effect of shape memory alloy on impact damage behavior and residual properties of glass/epoxy laminates under low temperature. Compos Struct 88:455–460
Khalil SMR, Shokuhfar A, Malekzadeh K, Ghasemi FA (2007) Low-velocity impact response of active thin-walled hybrid composite structures embedded with SMA wires. Thin-Walled Structures 45(9):799–808
Meo M, Antonucci E, Duclaux P, Giordano M (2005) Finite element simulation of low velocity impact on shape memory alloy composite plates. Compos Struct 71:337–342
Michaud V (2004) Can shape memory alloy composites be smart? Scr Mater 50:249–253
Murkute V, Gupta AK, Thakur DG, Harshe R, Joshi M (2014) Improvisation of interfacial bond strength in shape memory alloy hybrid polymer matrix composite. Procedia Mater Sci 6:316–321
Ogisu T, Shimanuki M, Kiyoshima S, Takeda N (2005) A basic study of CFRP laminates with embedded prestrained SMA foils for aircraft structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16:175
Paine JSN, Rogers CA (1994) Review of multi-functional SMA hybrid composite materials and their applications. Adaptive Struct Compos Mater: Anal Appl 54:37–45
Raghavan J, Bartkiewicz T, Boyko S, Kupriyanov M, Rajapakse N, Yu B (2010) Damping, tensile, and impact properties of superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Compos: Part B 41:214–222
Rogers CA, Robertshaw HH (1988) Shape memory alloy reinforced composites. Eng Sci Preprints 25 ES P25.8027
Smith NA, Antoun GG, Ellis AB, Crone WC (2004) Improved adhesion between nickel–titanium shape memory alloy and a polymer matrix via silane coupling agents. Compos A 35:1307–1312
Wei ZG, Tang CY, Lee WB (1997) Design and fabrication of intelligent composites based on shape memory alloys. J Mater Process Technol 69:68–74
Wei Z, Sandstrom R, Miyazaki S (1998) Shape-memory materials and hybrid composites for smart systems: part I shape-memory materials. J Mater Sci 33:3743–3762
Zheng YJ, Cui LS, Schrooten J (2005) Basic design guidelines for SMA/epoxy smart composites. Mater Sci Eng A 390:139–143
Acknowledgement
Authors wish to acknowledge the support given by Dr. Rahul Harshe and Dr. Rahul Purandare of Composite Research Center, R&DE(E) in doing SEM of composite samples. Authors also like to acknowledge Vinod Murkute for testing and Mr. Subodh Sharma and his team of Composite Research Center, R&DE(E) in fabrication of test samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, A.K., Velmurugan, R. & Joshi, M. Mechanical characterization of pseudoelastic shape memory alloy hybrid composites. ISSS J Micro Smart Syst 6, 149–160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41683-017-0016-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41683-017-0016-9