Skip to main content
Log in

Morphometric assessment of Gomati river basin, middle Ganga plain, Uttar Pradesh, North India

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Gomati river is draining through the interfluves areas between Ganga and Ghaghra river, which is northern part of Indo-Gangetic foreland basin. The Gomati river basin passes through many stages of degradation and aggradations influenced by subsurface tectonic (neo) activities, base-level changes and climatic variability over time and space. The Gomati river basin covers an area of about 30,843 sq km in the middle Ganga plain. The quantitative approach of basin prioritization of the Gomati river and its four fifth-order sub-basin (SUB1–SUB4) was carried out by the morphometric parameters using LANDSAT and SRTM data. Drainage patterns are mainly in sub-dendritic to dendritic type which indicates that the Gomati river follows the natural gradient of the terrain. It is also observed that the low drainage density values of sub-basins indicate that the basins have highly permeable subsoil and thick vegetative cover. The circularity ratio value reveals that the basin is strongly elongated. The asymmetric factor, transverse topography asymmetry and profile section analysis reflect the tilt and upliftment of Gomati basin, signifying the tectonic control on the Gomati basin especially towards the confluence part. This study would help to utilize the water resources and prioritization for sustainable development of the Gomati basin area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of applied hydrology, Section 4.39–4.76. New York: MacGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Esper, A. M. Y. (2008). Morphometric analysis of Colanguil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan, Argentina. Environmental Geology, 55, 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali, S. A., & Khan, N. (2013). Evaluation of morphometric parameters—A remote sensing and GIS based approach. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 3, 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gregory, K. J., & Walling, D. E. (1973). Drainage basin form and process a geomorphological approach. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56(3), 275–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, K. G. (1950). Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. American Journal of Science, 248, 655–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strahler, A. N. (1952). Hypsometric–area–altitude. Analysis of erosional topography. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63, 1117–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarp, G., Geçen, R., Toprak, V., & Düzgün, S. (2011). Morphotectonic properties of Yenicaga Basin Area in Turkey. In 34th International symposium on remote sensing of environment (ISRSE34).

  9. Krishnamurthy, J., Srinivas, G., Jayaram, V., & Chandrashekhar, M. G. (1996). Influence of rock type and structures in the development of drainage networks in typical hard rock terrain. ITC Journal, 3(4), 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal, C. S. (1998). Study of drainage pattern through aerial data in Naugarh area of Varanasi district, U.P. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 26, 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Biswas, S., Sudhakar, S., & Desai, V. R. (1999). Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin, District Midnapore, West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 27(3), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, C. K. (2014). Active deformations extracted from drainage geomorphology; a case study from Southern Sonbhadra district, Central India. Geological Society of India, 84, 569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh, C. K. (2015). Middle Ganga Plain; may be on the verge of seismic shock. Geological Society of India, 85, 511–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prakash, K., Singh, S., & Shukla, U. K. (2016). Morphometric changes of the Varuna river basin, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Geomatics, 10(1), 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, K. N., Latha, S. P., Kumar, A. P., & Krishna, H. M. (2010). Morphometric analysis of Gostani river basin in Andhra Pradesh State, India using spatial information technology. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 1(2), 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh, I. B. (1996). Geological evolution of Ganga plain—An overview. Journal of Palaeontological Society of India, 41, 99–137.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dury, G. H. (1970). General theory of meandering valleys and underfit streams. In G. H. Dury (Ed.), River and river terraces (pp. 264–275). London: MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Hajam, R. A., Hamid, A., & Bhat, S. U. (2013). Application of morphometric analysis for geo-hydrological studies using geo-spatial technology—A case study of Vishav drainage basin. Hydrology: Current Research, 4(3), 1–12. doi:10.4172/2157-7587.1000157.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leopold, L. B., & Bull, W. B. (1979). Base level, aggradation, and grade. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123, 168–202.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kondolf, G. M., & Hervè, P. (2003). Tools in fluvial geomorphology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Strahler, A. N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 38, 913–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mekel, J. F. M. (1970). The use of aerial photographs in geological mapping. ITC Text Book of Photointerpretations, 8, 1–169.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sreedevi, P. D., Subrahmanyam, K., & Ahmed, S. (2004). The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environmental Geology, 47, 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller, V. C. (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics on the Clinch Mountain area, Virgina and Tennessee. Project NR 389-402, Technical Report 3, Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, New York.

  25. Hadley, R. F., & Schumm, S. A. (1961). Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne river basin. USGS water supply paper, US Geological Survey, 1531-B.

  26. Schumm, S. A. (1963). Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the Great Plains. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 74, 1089–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cox, R. T., Van Arsdale, R. B., & Harris, J. B. (2001). Identification of possible quaternary deformation in the northeastern Mississippi Embayment using quantitative geomorphic analysis of drainage-basin asymmetry. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 113, 615–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dhanya, V. (2014). Basin asymmetry and associated tectonics: A case study of Achankovil river basin, Kerala. Transactions of the Institute of Indian Geographers, 36(2), 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cox, R. T. (1994). Analysis of drainage-basins symmetry as rapid technique to identify areas of possible Quaternary tilt-block tectonics: An example from Mississippi Embayment. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cuong, N. Q., & Zuchiewicz, W. A. (2001). Morphotectonic properties of the Lo river fault near Tam Dao in North Vietnam. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 1, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Raj, R. (2012). Active tectonics of NE Gujarat (India) by morphometric and morphostructural studies of Vatrak River basin. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 50, 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Prakash, K., Mohanty, T., Pati, J. K., Singh, S., & Chaubey, K. (2016). Morphotectonics of the Jamini River basin, Bundelkhand Craton, Central India; using remote sensing and GIS technique. Appl: Water Science. doi:10.1007/s13201-016-0524-y.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Molin, P., Pazzaglia, F. J., & Dramis, F. (2004). Geomorphic expression of the active tectonics in a rapidly deforming forearc, sila Massif, Calabria, Southern Italy. American Journal of Science, 304, 559–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Head, Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India for financial support from CAS grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Singh.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 1009 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prakash, K., Singh, S., Mohanty, T. et al. Morphometric assessment of Gomati river basin, middle Ganga plain, Uttar Pradesh, North India. Spat. Inf. Res. 25, 449–458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0110-x

Keywords

Navigation