Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technical Note: Analytical Evaluation of the Vulnerability of Framed Tall Buildings with Steel Plate Shear Wall to Progressive Collapse

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, vulnerability of tall buildings to unforeseen loads, induced by progressive collapse, has drawn researchers’ attentions. Steel plate shear walls have long been used as a lateral load-resisting system. It is composed of beam and column frame elements, to which infill plates are connected. There is a growing tendency among engineers to design tall buildings using steel plate shear walls. This paper investigates the progressive collapse-resisting capacity of the strip model of steel plate shear wall system compared with X-braced and moment frame system. The 3D models are used to assess the collapse behavior of typical 50-story building models, under sudden loss of elements from the middle and corner of the exterior frame in the story above the ground. The progressive collapse potential of model structures is evaluated by different nonlinear static and dynamic analyses using conventional analysis software. In this study, the vulnerability of candidate structures subjected to progressive collapse is also assessed by a sensitivity index regarding the sensitivity of structures to the dynamic effect induced by progressive collapse. To identify vulnerable members, the resulting actions of two nonlinear and linear static analyses are compared by the factor of redundancy related to the overall strength of the structure. Comparison of the analysis results indicated that in the steel plate shear wall system, the progressive collapse-resisting potential is more than X-braced and moment frame structure. Sensitive index of highly sensitive elements to the dynamic effect stated that in the structural models, beams are significantly more vulnerable in the moment frame than X-braced and SPSW structure. The index depicted that the vulnerability of columns in X-braced and SPSW structure is more than the moment frame structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shahrouzi M, Rahemi AA (2014) Improved seismic design of structural frames by optimization of equivalent lateral load pattern. Int J Civil Eng 12(2):158–169

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karimiyan S, Moghadam A, Kashan AH, Karimiyan M (2015) Progressive collapse evaluation of RC symmetric and asymmetric mid rise and tall buildings under earthquake loads. Int J Civil Eng 13(1):30–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mahmoudi M, Teimoori T, Kozani H (2015) Presenting displacement-based nonlinear static analysis method to calculate structural response against progressive collapse. Int J Civil Eng 13(4):478–485

    Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi Y, Takemoto Y, Takeda T, Takago M (1973) Experimental study on thin steel shear walls and particular bracings under alternative horizontal load, preliminary report, IABSE symposium on resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well-defined repeated loads, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 185–191

  5. Thorburn LJ, Kulak GL, Montgomery CJ (1983) Analysis of steel plate shear walls, structural engineering report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, p 107

  6. Driver RG, Kulak GL, Elwi AE, Kennedy DJL (1998) Cyclic test of a four-story steel plate shear wall. J Struct Eng 124(2):112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sabouri-Ghomi S, Gholhaki M (2008) Experimental study of two three-story ductile steel plate shear walls. Amirkabir J Civil Eng 19(68-C):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shishkin JJ, Driver RG, Grondin GY (2009) Analysis of steel plate shear walls using the modified strip model. J Struct Eng 35:1357–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Department of Defense (DoD)- Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) (2005) Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, UFC 4-023-03. USA: Department of Defense

  10. GSA (2003) Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization project, The U.S. General Service Administrations

  11. British Standards Institute (2000) Structural use of steelwork in building, Part 1: code of practice for design—rolled and welded sections, BS, 5950–5951

  12. Eurocode (2002) Actions on structures. European Committee of Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  13. (2003) New York City Department of Buildings, World Trade Center Building Code Task Force, Progressive Collapse Guidelines

  14. GSA (2013) Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance, The U.S. General Service Administrations

  15. Marjanishvili SM (2004) Progressive analysis procedure for progressive collapse. Perform Constr Facil 18(2):79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaewkulchai G, Williamson EB (2003) Dynamic behavior of planar frames during progressive collapse, 16th ASCE engineering mechanics conference. University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim T, Kim J (2009) Collapse analysis of steel moment frames with various seismic connections. J Constr Steel Res 65(6):1316–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim J, Park J (2008) Design of steel moment frames considering progressive collapse. Steel Compos Struct 8(1):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khandelwal K, El-Tawil S (2007) Collapse behavior of steel special moment resisting frame connections. J Struct Eng 133(5):646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim J, An D (2009) Evaluation of progressive collapse potential of steel moment frames considering catenary action. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 18(4):455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kheyroddin A, Gerami M, Mehrabi F (2014) Assessment of the dynamic effect of steel frame due to sudden middle column loss. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 23(5):390–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Astaneh-Asl A (2007) Progressive collapse prevention of steel frames with shear connections. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Middle for Catastrophic Risk Management University of California, Berkeley

  23. Khandelwal K, El-Tawil S, Sadek F (2009) Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames. J Constr Steel Res 65(3):699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim J, Lee Y, Choi H (2011) Progressive collapse resisting capacity of braced frames. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 20(2):257–270

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Escalera VSM (2011) Enhancing progressive collapse resistance of steel building frames using thin infill steel panels, MS thesis in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of California Polytechnic State University

  26. Kim J, Lee H (2013) Progressive collapse-resisting capacity of framed structures with infill steel panels. J Constr Steel Res 89:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim J, Lee Y (2010) Progressive collapse resisting capacity of tube-type structures. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 19(7):761–777

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mashhadiali N, Kheyroddin A (2014) Progressive collapse assessment of new hexagrid structural system for tall buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 23(12):947–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mashhadiali N, Kheyroddin A (2013) Proposing the hexagrid system as a new structural system for tall buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 22(17):1310–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Frangopol DM, Curley JP (1987) Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability. J Struct Eng 113(7):1533–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ito T, Ohi K, Li Z (2005) A sensitivity analysis related to redundancy of framed structures subjected to vertical loads. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 593:145–151

    Google Scholar 

  32. FEMA (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. ASCE 7-10 (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  34. AISC (2013) Manual of steel building, 14th edn. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  35. SAP2000 (2009) Structural analysis program. Computers and Structures, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kulak GL, Kennedy DJL, Driver RG, Medhekar M (2001) Steel plate shear walls—an overview. Am Inst Steel Constr Eng J First Quart 38(1):50–62

    Google Scholar 

  37. Han Q, Liu M, Lu Y, Wang C (2015) Progressive collapse analysis of large-span reticulated domes. J Steel Struct 15(2):261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Gholhaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mashhadiali, N., Gholhaki, M., Kheyroddin, A. et al. Technical Note: Analytical Evaluation of the Vulnerability of Framed Tall Buildings with Steel Plate Shear Wall to Progressive Collapse. Int J Civ Eng 14, 595–608 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0044-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0044-z

Keywords

Navigation