Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Meta-perspectives to Improve Equity and Inclusion

  • META-PERSPECTIVES
  • Published:
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Equity for those experiencing disability is a complex real-world issue best studied by cross-disciplinary groups. However, these cross-disciplinary studies are often unsuccessful due to the different perspectives held by members of the cross-disciplinary group. Meta-perspectives have been found to help overcome the issues caused by these different perspectives. This article discusses how a meta-perspective based on a typology of paradigms of disability can be useful to map and explore different paradigms of disability, build common ground, and help facilitate cross-disciplinary understanding and collaboration when studying topics such as equity and inclusion. The article then goes on to introduce a critical realist meta-perspective that transcends the different paradigms and the individual and social divide. This critical realist meta-perspective expands the typology further and allows the disciplines and perspectives to be mapped across a matrix of levels and scales of reality. This mapping of perspectives could shed new light on the issue of developing an equitable, inclusive society for those experiencing disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allet, L., Burge, E., & Monnin, D. (2008). ICF: Clinical relevance for physiotherapy? A critical review. Advances in Physiotherapy, 10, 127–137. doi:10.1080/14038190802315941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annan, J., & Mentis, M. (2013). Shifting perspectives to shape inclusive practice. In Centre of Excellence for Research in Inclusive Education (Ed.), Inclusive education: Perspectives on professional practice (pp. 25–39). Auckland: Dunmore Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2004). Theorising and researching disability from a social model perspective. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research. Leeds: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., & Ward, A. (2000). Concepts of rehabilitation. In M. Barnes & A. Wards (Eds.), Textbook of rehabilitation (pp. 3–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2001). Philosophy of social sciences: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan-Brown, J. (2003). The cultural self-review: Providing culturally effective, inclusive education for Māori learners. Wellington: NZCER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds: Leeds Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond one’s own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practicing Interdisciplinarity (pp. 115–133). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. M. (2014). A design-based research study to promote cross-disciplinary collaboration using a case study from the New Zealand disability field. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand).

  • Collier, A. (2004). Critical realism. An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (2005). Wicked problems and social complexity. In J. Conklin (Ed.), Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, J. (2003). Introduction. In J. Cruickshank (Ed.), Critical realism: The difference it makes (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danermark, B. (2002). Interdisciplinary research and critical realism: The example of disability research. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 56–64. Retrieved from http://www.criticalrealism.com/archive/iacr_conference_2001/bdanermark_ircr.pdf.

  • Dean, S., Siegert, R., & Taylor, V. (2012). Conclusion: Rethinking rehabilitation. In S. Dean, R. Siegert, & V. Taylor (Eds.), Interprofessional rehabilitation (pp. 167–183). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, H. (2007). Shifting paradigms in universal design. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal access in human computer interaction. Coping with Diversity (pp. 66–74). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D., & Dougherty, S. (2005). Prospects for a positive psychology of rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(3), 305–311. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.50.3.305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyh, S., Peter, C., Muller, R., Stucki, G., & Cieza, A. (2011). Translating topics in SCI psychology into the international classification of functioning, disability and health. The Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 16(3), 104–130. doi:10.1310/sci1603-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2002). Theoretical approaches to disability content in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(1), 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, D. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C. (2008). Interdisciplinarity and boundary work: Challenges and opportunities for agrifood studies. Agriculture and Human Values, 25, 209–213. doi:10.1007/s10460-008-9118-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. (2005). Unifying social science—a critical realist approach. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.gjss.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdf?idno=m0202a02;c=gjss

  • Kearney, P. (2003). The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2), 162–170. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02976.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, A. (2009). Barriers to school inclusion: An investigation into the exclusion of disabled students from and within New Zealand Schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand).

  • Klein, J. (2010). The taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGrow, S. (1998). The culture of rehabilitation: An international perspective. Paper presented at the 9th international mobility conference, Atlanta GA, USA.

  • Lequerica, A., & Korette, K. (2010). Therapeutic engagement: A proposed model of engagement in medical rehabilitation. Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(5), 415–422. doi:10.109/PHM.0b013e3181d8ceb2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, G. (2003). Inclusive education: A critical perspective. British Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 3–12. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meekosha, H. (1998). Body Battles: Bodies, gender and disability. The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 163–181). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, P., & Kelly, B. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability and Society, 24(1), 47–62. doi:10.1080/09687590802535410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. (1997). The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, H. (2012). The social model of disability as a threshold concept: Troublesome knowledge and liminal spaces in social work education. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 31(2), 215–226. doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.644964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Health. (2002). He korowai oranga—Maori health strategy. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Disability Issues. (2011). First New Zealand report on implementing the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Wellington: Office for Disability Issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Disability Issues. (2015). Disability action plan 2014–2018. Wellington: Office for Disability Issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olkin, R., & Pledger, C. (2003). Can disability studies and psychology join hands? American Psychologist, 58(4), 296–304. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.4.296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. (1998). Constructions and creations: Idealism, materialism and disability theory. Disability and Society, 13(1), 75–94. doi:10.1080/09687599826920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, O. (2009). Critical psychology and disability: Critiqing the mainstream, critiquing the critique. Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 250–266). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. (2010). Prospects for a philosophy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (pp. 39–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability and Society, 15(4), 569–582. doi:10.1080/09687590050058189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Threats, T. (2010). The complexity of social/cultural dimension in communication disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica, 62, 158–165. doi:10.1159/000314031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2006). United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2012). Definition of occupational therapy. Retrieved from http://www.wfot.org/aboutus/aboutoccupationaltherapy/definitionofoccupationaltherapy.aspx.

  • World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

    Julia Budd

Authors
  1. Julia Budd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Budd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Budd, J. Using Meta-perspectives to Improve Equity and Inclusion. NZ J Educ Stud 51, 227–244 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-016-0060-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-016-0060-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation