Abstract
This research aims at exploring the impact of scrapping kerosene subsidy on the welfare of the poor. In India, still 31 % of households use kerosene fuel as an alternative source of energy to illuminate their house, especially in rural India. Kerosene along with the other social security goods has been disbursed at a highly subsidised rate for a long time. Off late, a new policy vows at scrapping such subsidies as a strategy to reform and restructure the energy sector. Keeping these things in consideration, the study views scrapping policy as having an adverse impact on people. The present study employs the latest census record (2011) on household energy consumption—source of lighting—for the analysis. The results bring to light a wide divide at various spatial levels of evaluation with regard to usage of kerosene and electricity for lighting purposes within the household. Apart from the gap at rural, urban, national, state and district level, the districts of the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states which are traditionally lagging behind in all the development indicators form a cluster of the major consumers of subsidised kerosene. The study also reveals that the below poverty line (BPL) population in these states has inflated at a rapid scale which could get affected with the new policy. Although kerosene, as a source of energy, is not green, it needs to be subsidised till there is a universal access to electricity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Having partial financial support from public funds (administered pricing mechanism that taxed certain fuels)
Those spending over Rs. 32 a day in rural areas and Rs. 47 in towns and cities should not be considered poor, an expert panel headed by former RBI governor C Rangarajan.
Estimated household using kerosene: Total number of HHs / Total population = Average number of HHs size * actual number of HHs using kerosene
Composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators
References
Alam, M., Sathaye, J., & Barnes, D. (1998). Urban household energy use in India: efficiency and policy implications. Energy Policy, 26(11), 885–891. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00008-1.
Anand, R., Coady, D., Mohommad, A., Thakoor, V., Walsh, J. P. (2013). The fiscal and welfare impacts of reforming fuel subsidies in India (A. a. P. Department, Trans.). IMF Working Paper (pp. 30).
Barnes, D. F., Plas, R. V. D., & Floor, W. (1997). Tackling the rural energy problem in developing countries. Finance Development, 34(2), 11–15.
Bhatia, R. (1988). Energy pricing and household energy consumption in India. The Energy Journal, 9, 71–105.
Census of India. (2011). Houselisting and housing census. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. New Delhi.
Central Electricity Authority (2013). Status of village electrification in India. Government of India. http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/monthly/dpd_div_rep/village_electrification.pdf. Accessed 02 January 2014.
K. Clarke (2014). Kerosene subsidies in India. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/GSI/sites/default/files/ffs_india_kerosene.pdf. Accessed 21 September 2014.
Das, B., & Mistri, A. (2013). Household quality of living in Indian states: analysis of 2011 census. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 4(1), 151–171. doi:10.1177/0975425313477759.
Dugoua, E., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). Relative deprivation and energy poverty: when does unequal access to electricity cause dissatisfaction? International Journal of Energy Research, 38(13), 1727–1740. doi:10.1002/er.3200.
Gangopadhyay, S., Ramaswamia, B., & Wadhwa, W. (2005). Reducing subsidies on household fuels in India: how will it affect the poor? Energy Policy, 33(18), 2326–2336. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.024.
Institute of Applied Manpower Research (2011). India human development report 2011: towards social inclusion. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Khandker, S. R., Barnes, D. F., & Samad, H. A. (2012). Are the energy poor also income poor? Evidence from India. Energy Policy, 47, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.028.
Kumar, Mrityunjay (2014). Power supply to rural India a pressing concern. The Economic Times. http://www.niticentral.com/2014/06/25/power-supply-to-rural-india-a-pressing-concern-232244.html. Accessed 24 August 2014.
Mehra, P. (2014). No more subsidised kerosene through PDS. The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/no-more-subsidised-kerosene-through-pds/article6662420.ece.
Mehta, S. H. (2013). Lighting scenario in rural India—dark nights in Bihar. RESET. https://en.reset.org/knowledge/lighting-scenario-rural-india-dark-nights-bihar. Accessed 24 August 2014.
National Sample Survey Office. (2015). Energy sources of Indian households for cooking and lighting, 2011–12. New Delhi: National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
Panigrahi, S., & Pathak, N. (2015). Securing food through the public distribution system: evidence from Odisha. Global Social Welfare. doi:10.1007/s40609-015-0040-2.
Planning Commission (2013). Press note on poverty estimates, 2011–12. Government of India. http://planningcommission.nic.in/news/pre_pov2307.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2013.
Ravindranath, N. H., & Ramakrishna, J. (1997). Energy options for cooking in India. Energy Policy, 25(1), 63–75. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(96)00105-X.
Reddy, A. K. N., & Reddy, B. S. (1994). Substitution of energy carriers for cooking in Bangalore. Energy, 19(5), 561–571. doi:10.1016/0360-5442(94)90052-3.
Reserve Bank of India. (2012). Reserve Bank of India annual report 2011–12. Central Board of Directors, Reserve Bank of India. https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/AnnualReport/PDFs/01ANR230812FL.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2014.
World Bank. (2003). India: access of the poor to clean household fuels. (Vol. no. ESM 263/03). Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP): World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ansary, R., Das, B. Decisions of Scrapping the Subsidies in Kerosene Supply in India: How Will It Affect the Poor?. Glob Soc Welf 5, 137–143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-016-0063-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-016-0063-3