Skip to main content
Log in

A Qualitative Study of Factors Affecting Morale in Psychiatry Residency Training

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Resident morale is an important yet poorly understood aspect of the residency training experience. Despite implications for program quality, resident satisfaction, patient care, and recruitment, little is known about the variables influencing this complex phenomenon. This study sought to identify important factors affecting morale in psychiatry residency training.

Methods

The authors conducted four semi-structured focus groups at a moderately sized, urban, psychiatry residency program during the 2013–2014 academic year. They used qualitative data analysis techniques, including grounded theory and content analysis, to identify key themes affecting resident morale across training levels.

Results

Twenty-seven residents participated in the focus groups with equal distribution across post-graduate years (PGY) 1–4. Five major conceptual categories affecting resident morale emerged: Sense of Community, Individual Motivators, Clinical Work, Feeling Cared For, and Trust in the Administration.

Conclusions

Morale is an important topic in residency education. The qualitative results suggest that factors related to a Sense of Community and Individual Motivators generally enhanced resident morale whereas factors related to a lack of Feeling Cared For and Trust in the Administration tended to contribute to lower morale. The authors describe the possible interventions to promote stronger program morale suggested by these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Yudkowsky R, Elliott R, Schwartz A. Two perspectives on the indicators of quality in psychiatry residencies: program directors’ and residents’. Acad Med. 2002;77(1):57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elliott R, Yudkowsky R, Vogel R. Quality in psychiatric training. Acad Psychiatry. 2000;24(1):41–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haupt DN et al. Psychiatry/medicine: a comparison of factors in resident role satisfaction. J Psychiatr Educ. 1987;11(2):78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellencweig N, Weizman A, Fischel T. Factors determining satisfaction in psychiatry training in Israel. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(2):169–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simmonds ACT et al. Factors important to students in selecting a residency program. Acad Med. 1990;65(10):640–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levy BR, Schrage H. Residency applicants in psychiatry: factors influencing program choice. Acad Psychiatry. 1996;20(2):76–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagler A et al. To match or not: factors influencing resident choice of graduate medical education program. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(2):159–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson S et al. Morale in the English mental health workforce: questionnaire survey. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grieve S. Measuring morale—does practice area deprivation affect doctors’ well-being? Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47(422):547–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cutler JL et al. Discrediting the notion “working with ‘crazies’ will make you ‘crazy’”: addressing stigma and enhancing empathy in medical student education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14(4):487–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Punch K. Section 10.5: Grounded theory analysis, in introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications; 1998. p. 210–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Punch K. Section 8.5: Grounded theory, in introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications; 1998. p. 162–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herzberg F. One more time: how do you motivate employees? 1968. Harv Bus Rev. 2003;81(1):87–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell SBM. Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought. New York: Basic Books; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fried FE, Doherty EG, Coyne L. Psychiatric residents: a survey of training needs, satisfactions, and social attitudes. Am J Psychiatr. 1973;130:1342–5. 0002-953X (Print).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Skodol AE, Maxmen JS. Role satisfaction among psychiatric residents. Compr Psychiatry. 1981;22(2):174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the participation of all the focus group participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel A. Caravella.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by Institutional Review Board at the New York State Psychiatric Institute.

Author Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding Source

This study received no funding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caravella, R.A., Robinson, L.A., Wilets, I. et al. A Qualitative Study of Factors Affecting Morale in Psychiatry Residency Training. Acad Psychiatry 40, 776–782 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0567-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0567-2

Keywords

Navigation