Abstract
Objective
For psychiatry research resident career development, there is a recognized need for improved cross-institutional mentoring and networking opportunities. One method to address this need is via regional conferences, open to current and recently graduated research residents and their mentors. With this in mind, we developed the biennial California Psychiatry Research Resident Retreat (CPRRR) and collected feedback from participants to 1) Assess resident satisfaction, 2) Determine the utility of the retreat as a networking and mentorship tool, and 3) Identify areas for improvement.
Methods
We gathered survey data from resident attendees at the two first CPRRRs. We analyzed the data to look for trends in satisfaction as well as areas that need improvement.
Results
Thirty-two residents from five California training programs attended the CPRRR in 2013 while 33 attended from six programs in 2015. The residents were from all years of training, but concentrated in their second and third years. Approximately 41% and 49% of the attendees were female and 53% and 39% had an MD/PhD in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Twenty-four and 32 residents provided anonymous feedback in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Mean feedback scores were very high (> 4/5) for overall satisfaction, peer- and faculty-networking, the keynote speaker and the flash talks for both years. Mean feedback scores for the ethics debates and mentoring sessions were somewhat lower (≤ 4/5), however, both showed significant improvement from 2013 to 2015.
Conclusion
The CPRRRs appear to be an effective mechanism for providing psychiatry research residents with a meaningful cross-institutional opportunity for networking and mentorship. Feedback-driven changes to the CPRRRs improved participant satisfaction for several components of the conference. Future efforts will be aimed at broadening mentorship and networking opportunities, optimizing teaching approaches for research ethics, and considering different feedback-gathering approaches to allow for improved longitudinal follow-up and subgroup analysis.
References
Insel TR, Landis SC. Twenty-five years of progress: the view from NIMH and NINDS. Neuron. 2013;80:561–7. Elsevier Inc.
Krystal JH, State MW. Psychiatric disorders: diagnosis to therapy. Cell. 2014;157:201–14. Elsevier Inc.
Kupfer DJ, Hyman SE, Schatzberg AF, Pincus HA, Reynolds CF. Recruiting and retaining future generations of physician scientists in mental health. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:657–60.
Roane DM, Inan E, Haeri S, Galynker II. Ensuring research competency in psychiatric residency training. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33:215–20.
Hamoda HM, Bauer MS, DeMaso DR, Sanders KM, Mezzacappa E. A competency-based model for research training during psychiatry residency. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011;19:78–85.
Gilbert AR, Tew JD, Reynolds CF, Pincus HA, Ryan N, Nash K, et al. A developmental model for enhancing research training during psychiatry residency. Acad Psychiatry. 2006;30:55–62.
Tsai AC, Ordóñez AE, Reus VI, Mathews CA. Eleven-year outcomes from an integrated residency program to train research psychiatrists. Acad Med. 2013;88:983–8.
Hitchcock MA, Bland CJ, Hekelman FP, Blumenthal MG. Professional networks: the influence of colleagues on the academic success of faculty. Acad Med. 1995;70:1108–16.
Kupfer DJ, Schatzberg AF, Grochocinski VJ, Dunn LO, Kelley KA, O’Hara RM. The career development institute for psychiatry: an innovative, longitudinal program for physician-scientists. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33:313–8.
Yager J, Greden J, Abrams M, Riba M. The Institute of Medicine’s report on research training in psychiatry residency: strategies for reform—background, results, and follow up. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28:267–74.
Straus SE, Sackett DL. Mentorship in academic medicine. Wiley: Chichesters; 2013.
National Institutes of Health. Grants & Funding [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Aug 1]. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/ac_search_results.htm?text_curr=r25&Search.x=0&Search.y=0&Search_Type=Activity.
Reardon S. US vaccine researcher sentenced to prison for fraud. Nature. 2015.
Bonetta L. The aftermath of scientific fraud. Cell. 2006;124:873–5.
NIH. Notice Number: NOT-OD-10-019 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Aug 24]. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-10-019.html.
Balon R, Guerra E, Meador-Woodruff JH, Oquendo MA, Salloum IM, Casiano DE, et al. Innovative approach to research training: research colloquium for junior investigators. Acad Psychiatry. 35:11–4.
Interian A, Escobar JI. The use of a mentoring-based conference as a research career stimulation strategy. Acad Med. 2009;84:1389–94.
Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L, Blumenthal D, Chimonas SC, Cohen JJ, et al. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA. 2006;295:429–33.
Sah S, Fugh-Berman A. Physicians under the influence: social psychology and industry marketing strategies. J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41:665–72.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Erika Nurmi, David Krantz, Brian Mohlenhoff, Michael Jacob and Aviva Olsavsky for all of their help and support in running these retreats. The authors would also like to thank Kevin Delucchi for his assistance with the statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding/Support
This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health grant R25MH060482 to CAM and VIR.
Disclosures
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Table S1
(PDF 59 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Besterman, A.D., Williams, J.K., Reus, V.I. et al. The Role of Regional Conferences in Research Resident Career Development: The California Psychiatry Research Resident Retreat. Acad Psychiatry 41, 272–277 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0562-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0562-7