Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attitudes Toward Neuroscience Education Among Psychiatry Residents and Fellows

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study is to assess the attitudes of psychiatry trainees toward neuroscience education in psychiatry residency and subsequent training in order to inform neuroscience education approaches in the future.

Methods

This online survey was designed to capture demographic information, self-assessed neuroscience knowledge, attitudes toward neuroscience education, preferences in learning modalities, and interest in specific neuroscience topics. Volunteers were identified through the American Psychiatric Association, which invited 2,563 psychiatry trainees among their members.

Results

Four hundred thirty-six trainees completed the survey. Nearly all agreed that there is a need for more neuroscience education in psychiatry residency training (94 %) and that neuroscience education could help destigmatize mental illness (91 %). Nearly all (94 %) expressed interest in attending a 3-day course on neuroscience. Many neuroscience topics and modes of learning were viewed favorably by participants. Residents in their first 2 years of training expressed attitudes similar to those of more advanced residents and fellows. Some differences were found based on the level of interest in a future academic role.

Conclusions

This web-based study demonstrates that psychiatry residents see neuroscience education as important in their training and worthy of greater attention. Our results suggest potential opportunities for advancing neuroscience education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Freud S. Project for a scientific psychology. In: Jones E, editor. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth; 1895. p. 295–397.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gach J. Biological psychiatry in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In: Wallace ER, Gach J, editors. History of psychiatry and medical psychology. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reynolds III CF, Lewis DA, Detre T, Schatzberg AF, Kupfer DJ. The future of psychiatry as clinical neuroscience. Acad Med. 2009;84(4):446–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubin EH, Zorumski CF. Perspective: upcoming paradigm shifts for psychiatry in clinical care, research, and education. Acad Med. 2012;87(3):261–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: the NIMH Research Domain Criteria project. Schizophrenia Bull. 2010;36(6):1061–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K, et al. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatr. 2010;167(7):748–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris SE, Cuthbert BN. Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012;14(1):29–37.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roffman JL, Simon AB, Prasad KM, Truman CJ, Morrison J, Ernst CL. Neuroscience in psychiatry training: how much do residents need to know? Am J Psychiatr. 2006;163(5):919–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hales D, Delanoche N. Resident census—characteristics and distribution of psychiatry residents in the U.S. 2011–2012. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vrecko S. Neuroscience, power and culture: an introduction. Hist Human Sci. 2010;23(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schreiber D. On social attribution: implications of recent cognitive neuroscience research for race, law, and politics. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012;18(3):557–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Insel TR, Wang PS. Rethinking mental illness. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(19):1970–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benjamin S; Cooper J; Dickey C; Reardon C; Travis M, editors. Neuropsychiatry/neuroscience education of psychiatry trainees: attitudes and barriers. American Neuropsychiatric Association Annual Meeting 2012.

  14. Hoop JG, Savla G, Roberts LW, Zisook S, Dunn LB. The current state of genetics training in psychiatric residency: views of 235 U.S. educators and trainees. Acad Psychiatry. 2010;34(2):109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. Jama. 2006;296(9):1094–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, Dunning D, Kruger J. Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2008;105(1):98–121.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alfonso CA, Olarte SW. Contemporary practice patterns of dynamic psychiatrists—survey results. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatr. 2011;39(1):7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lichwala-Zyla C, Price JH, Dake JA, Jordan T, Price JA. Psychiatrists’ perceptions and practices in treating patients’ obesity. Acad Psychiatr. 2009;33(5):370–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bourgeois JA, Cohen MA, Geppert CM. The role of psychosomatic-medicine psychiatrists in bioethics: a survey study of members of the academy of psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics. 2006;47(6):520–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jain S, Dunn LB, Warner CH, Roberts LW. Results of a multisite survey of U.S. psychiatry residents on education in professionalism and ethics. Acad Psychiatr. 2011;35(3):175–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lilly MN, Lapid MI, Richardson JW. Perspectives on geriatric psychiatry: results of a single site survey of psychiatry residents. Acad Psychiatr. 2012;36(1):69–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sockalingam S, Stergiopoulos V, Maggi J. Residents’ perceived physician-manager educational needs: a national survey of psychiatry residents. Can J Psychiatr Revue canadienne de psychiatrie. 2008;53(11):745–52.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:821–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Braithwaite D, Emery J, de Lusignan S, Sutton S. Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract. 2003;20(5):545–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. John Oldham, Dr. Dilip Jeste, Dr. Eve Moscicki, Ms. Shelly Cohen, and Ms. Janet Kuramoto of the American Psychiatric Association for coordinating the invitation of its members to complete the online survey as well as the 2013 graduating class of general psychiatry at Stanford for their feedback in the pilot study. The authors would like to thank all participants of this study for completing the survey.

Disclosures

The authors report no financial conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Etkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fung, L.K., Akil, M., Widge, A. et al. Attitudes Toward Neuroscience Education Among Psychiatry Residents and Fellows. Acad Psychiatry 38, 127–134 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0034-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0034-x

Keywords

Navigation