Skip to main content
Log in

Right vs Left Hepatectomy for LDLT, Safety and Regional Preference

  • Liver Transplantation (R. Batra and D. Mulligan, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Transplantation Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposeof Review

We aim to gather up-to-date information on living liver donation trends, perspective and future directions, with a particular focus on donor safety and regional preference based on type of donor hepatectomy.

Recent Findings

Outcomes after donor hepatectomy have improved. Reported literature favors that there is no difference in complication rate based on hepatectomy side. Differences on living liver donation trends with a regional discrepancy are evident. Data shows that LDLT accounts for up to 90% of LT in Eastern countries, while it only accounts for < 10% in Western countries. Future directions include the wide dissemination of minimally invasive techniques.

Summary

Donor hepatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure regardless of hepatectomy side. Donor safety should be ensured throughout a comprehensive and detailed donor evaluation, follow-up and interdisciplinary efforts. Western countries can benefit from the vast experience of Eastern countries to increase dissemination and adopt innovative techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

LDLT:

Living donor liver transplantation

LDRH:

Laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy

LL:

Left lobe

LLS:

Left lateral segment

LOS:

Length of hospital stay

MIT:

Minimally invasive techniques

MHV:

Middle hepatic vein

ODRH:

Open living donor right hepatectomy

RD:

Risk difference

RL:

Right lobe

RLDRH:

Robotic living donor right hepatectomy

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Goldaracena N, Cullen JM, Kim DS, Ekser B, Halazun KJ. Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation with marginal donors. Int J Surg. 2020;82S:30–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.024 (Epub 2020 May 15 PMID: 32422385).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liew B, Nasralla D, Iype S, Pollok JM, Davidson B, Raptis DA. Liver transplant outcomes after ex vivo machine perfusion: a meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2021;108(12):1409–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab364 (PMID: 34791070).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg CL, Merion RM, Shearon TH, Olthoff KM, Brown RS Jr, Baker TB, Everson GT, Hong JC, Terrault N, Hayashi PH, Fisher RA, Everhart JE. Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era. Hepatology. 2011;54(4):1313–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24494.PMID:21688284;PMCID:PMC3184197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abu-Gazala S, Olthoff KM. Status of adult living donor liver transplantation in the United States: results from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018;47(2):297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2018.01.004 (PMID: 29735025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwong AJ, Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, Schladt DP, Skeans MA, Noreen SM, Foutz J, Booker SE, Cafarella M, Snyder JJ, Israni AK, Kasiske BL. OPTN/SRTR 2019 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2021;21(Suppl 2):208–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16494 (PMID: 33595192).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wanis KN, Sarvet A, Ruffolo LI, Levstik MA, Tomiyama K, Al-Judaibi BM, Stensrud MJ, Hernandez-Alejandro R. Estimating the effect of increasing utilization of living donor liver transplantation using observational data. Transpl Int. 2021;34(4):648–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13835 (Epub 2021 Feb 26 PMID: 33527506).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghobrial RM, Freise CE, Trotter JF, Tong L, Ojo AO, Fair JH, Fisher RA, Emond JC, Koffron AJ, Pruett TL, Olthoff KM, A2ALL Study Group. Donor morbidity after living donation for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(2):468–76. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JG, Lee KW, Kwon CHD, Chu CW, Kim BW, Choi DL, You YK, Kim DS, Nah YW, Kang KJ, Choi IS, Yu HC, Hong G, Han HS, Hwang S, Kim MS. Donor safety in living donor liver transplantation: the Korean organ transplantation registry study. Liver Transpl. 2017;23(8):999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24778 (PMID: 28431203).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cotter TG, Minhem M, Wang J, Peeraphatdit T, Ayoub F, Pillai A, Hernandez-Alejandro R, di Sabato D, Charlton M. Living donor liver transplantation in the United States: evolution of frequency, outcomes, center volumes, and factors associated with outcomes. Liver Transpl. 2021;27(7):1019–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.26029 (Epub 2021 Jun 24 PMID: 33619854).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Rössler F, Sapisochin G, Song G, Lin YH, Simpson MA, Hasegawa K, Laurenzi A, Sánchez Cabús S, Nunez MI, Gatti A, Beltrame MC, Slankamenac K, Greig PD, Lee SG, Chen CL, Grant DR, Pomfret EA, Kokudo N, Cherqui D, Olthoff KM, Shaked A, García-Valdecasas JC, Lerut J, Troisi RI, De Santibanes M, Petrowsky H, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. Defining benchmarks for major liver surgery: a multicenter analysis of 5202 living liver donors. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):492-500. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001849. PMID: 27433909. Benchmark-defining study with multicenter, international, 10-year data. This outstanding manuscript define the best achievable outcome after major hepatectomy using living donor liver hepatectomy as a referent for safety standards.

  11. Chen CL, Kabiling CS, Concejero AM. Why does living donor liver transplantation flourish in Asia? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(12):746–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.194 (Epub 2013 Oct 8 PMID: 24100300).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rela M, Rammohan A. Why are there so many liver transplants from living donors in Asia and so few in Europe and the US? J Hepatol. 2021;75(4):975–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.036 (Epub 2021 Jun 8 PMID: 34111504).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hibi T, Wei Chieh AK, Chi-Yan Chan A, Bhangui P. Current status of liver transplantation in Asia. Int J Surg. 2020;82S:4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.071 (Epub 2020 Jun 11 PMID: 32535264).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jalil S, Black SM, Washburn K, Rangwani N, Hinton A, Kelly SG, Conteh L, Hanje J, Michaels A, Mumtaz K. Trends and health care outcomes among living liver donors: are we ready to expand the donor pool with living liver donations? Liver Transpl. 2021;27(11):1603–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.26223 (Epub 2021 Aug 16 PMID: 34213813).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Halazun KJ, Przybyszewski EM, Griesemer AD, Cherqui D, Michelassi F, Guarrera JV, Kato T, Brown RS Jr, Emond JC, Samstein B. Leaning to the left: increasing the donor pool by using the left lobe, outcomes of the largest single-center North American experience of left lobe adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):448–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001860 (PMID: 27433896).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Vargas PA, McCracken EKE, Mallawaarachchi I, Ratcliffe SJ, Argo C, Pelletier S, Zaydfudim VM, Oberholzer J, Goldaracena N. Donor morbidity is equivalent between right and left hepatectomy for living liver donation: a meta-analysis. Liver Transpl. 2021;27(10):1412-1423. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.26183. Epub 2021 Jul 14. PMID: 34053171. First meta-analysis comparing donor-specific outcomes after right versus left living donor hepatectomy of existing modern-era studies. The authors aimed to quantify the safety of right versus left hepatectomy for liver donors by using a series of meta-analyses among outcomes of interest.

  17. Karakaya E, Akdur A, Ayvazoglu Soy EH, Harman A, Coskun M, Haberal M. Our living donor protocol for liver transplant: a single center experience. Exp Clin Transplant. 2020;18(6):689–95. https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2020.0280 (PMID: 33187462).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldaracena N, Jung J, Aravinthan AD, Abbey SE, Krause S, Pritlove C, Lynch J, Wright L, Selzner N, Stunguris J, Greig P, Ghanekar A, McGilvray I, Sapisochin G, Ng VL, Levy G, Cattral M, Grant D. Donor outcomes in anonymous live liver donation. J Hepatol. 2019;71(5):951–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.027 (Epub 2019 Jul 4 PMID: 31279899).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel MS, Mohamed Z, Ghanekar A, Sapisochin G, McGilvray I, Sayed BA, Reichman T, Selzner M, Gross JA, Galvin Z, Bhat M, Lilly L, Cattral M, Selzner N. Living donor liver paired exchange: a North American first. Am J Transplant. 2021;21(1):400–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16137 (Epub 2020 Jul 10 PMID: 32524750).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gunabushanam V, Ganesh S, Soltys K, Mazariegos G, Ganoza A, Molinari M, Tevar A, Hughes C, Humar A. Increasing living donor liver transplantation using liver paired exchange. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234(2):115–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000036 (PMID: 35213430).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. •• Soubrane O, Eguchi S, Uemoto S, Kwon CHD, Wakabayashi G, Han HS, Kim KH, Troisi RI, Cherqui D, Rotellar F, Cauchy F, Soyama A, Ogiso S, Choi GS, Takahara T, Cho JY, Cho HD, Vanlander A, Pittau G, Scatton O, Pardo F, Baker T. Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation: an international, multi-institutional evaluation of safety, efficacy and early outcomes. Ann Surg. 2022;275(1):166-174. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003852. PMID: 32224747. Multi-institutional series with over 400 cases from both, Eastern and Western centers, evaluating perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplants.

  22. • Kaplan A, Rosenblatt R, Samstein B, Brown RS Jr. Can living donor liver transplantation in the United States reach its potential? Liver Transpl. 2021;27(11):1644-1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.26220. Epub 2021 Jul 31. PMID: 34174025. Comprehensive review of living donor liver transplantation trends, potential and future directions in Unites States.

  23. Yagi S, Singhal A, Jung DH, Hashimoto K. Living-donor liver transplantation: right versus left. Int J Surg. 2020;82S:128–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.022 (Epub 2020 Jun 30 PMID: 32619620).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldaracena N, Echeverri J, Selzner M. Small-for-size syndrome in live donor liver transplantation-pathways of injury and therapeutic strategies. Clin Transplant. 201731(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12885. Epub 2017 Jan 11. PMID: 27935645.

  25. Braun HJ, Roberts JP. Current status of left lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021;26(2):139–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000863 (PMID: 33595983).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitajima T, Sakamoto S, Sasaki K, Narumoto S, Kazemi K, Hirata Y, Fukuda A, Imai R, Miyazaki O, Irie R, Teramukai S, Uemoto S, Kasahara M. Impact of graft thickness reduction of left lateral segment on outcomes following pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(9):2208–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14875 (Epub 2018 May 15 PMID: 29673096).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Narasimhan G, Safwan M, Kota V, Reddy MS, Bharathan A, Dabora A, Kaliamoorthy I, Kanagavelu RG, Srinivasan V, Rela M. Donor outcomes in living donor liver transplantation-analysis of 275 donors from a single centre in India. Transplantation. 2016;100(6):1251–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001246 (PMID: 27203592).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cho CW, Choi GS, Kim KS. Surgical techniques and outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor right posterior sectionectomy for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2022;28(2):325–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.26244 (Epub 2021 Aug 19 PMID: 34314564).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Takagi K, Domagala P, Polak WG, Ijzermans JNM, Boehnert MU. Right posterior segment graft for living donor liver transplantation: a systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2020;34(1):100510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2019.100510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goja S, Yadav SK, Saigal S, Soin AS. Right lobe donor hepatectomy: is it safe? A retrospective study Transpl Int. 2018;31(6):600–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13092 (Epub 2017 Dec 1 PMID: 29130558).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang V, Chen CL, Lin YH, Lin TS, Lin CC, Wang SH, Yong CC, Chen CY, Cheng YF. Bilateral proficiency over time leads to reduced donor morbidity in living donor hepatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019;8(5):459–69. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2019.03.12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. •• Gorgen A, Goldaracena N, Zhang W, Rosales R, Ghanekar A, Lilly L, Cattral M, Greig P, McCluskey S, McGilvray I, Selzner N, Bhat M, Selzner M, Levy G, Grant D, Sapisochin G. Surgical complications after right hepatectomy for live liver donation: largest single-center western world experience. Semin Liver Dis. 2018;38(2):134-144. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636932. Epub 2018 Mar 22. PMID: 29566408. Largest cohort study in North America evaluating the incidence, management, and risk factors for postoperative complications after right lobe living donor hepatectomy in a high-volume center in Toronto, Canada.

  33. Yi PS, Zhang M, Xu MQ. Management of the middle hepatic vein in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015;35(4):600–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1477-3 (Epub 2015 Jul 31 PMID: 26223934).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tan CHN, Hwang S, Bonney GK, Ganpathi IS, Madhavan K, Kow WCA. The influence of the middle hepatic vein and its impact on outcomes in right lobe living donor liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(5):547–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.09.003 (Epub 2018 Oct 4 PMID: 30292529).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Goja S, Kumar Yadav S, Singh SA. Readdressing the middle hepatic vein in right lobe liver donation: triangle of safety. Liver Transpl. 2018;24(10):1363–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25289 (PMID: 30359489).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yeow MWX, Pang NQ, Bonney GK, Madhavan K, Kow WCA, Iyer SG. Living donor hepatectomy in medium volume liver transplant centre has comparable outcomes to high volume centres: validation of donabedian quality assurance framework. HPB (Oxford). 2021:S1365–182X(21)01590–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.946. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34544630.

  37. LaPointe RD, DeLair S, Feeley T, Florman S, Guarrera J, Kinkhabwala M, Orloff M, Teperman L, Morgan G. Longterm impact of living liver donation: a self-report of the donation experience. Liver Transpl. 2019;25(5):724–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25402 (Epub 2019 Mar 26 PMID: 30589993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morooka Y, Umeshita K, Taketomi A, Shirabe K, Yoshizumi T, Yamamoto M, Shimamura T, Oshita A, Ohdan H, Kawagishi N, Hagiwara K, Eguchi H, Nagano H. Long-term donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation in Japan. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(6):e13584. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang W, Xu L, Zhang J, Che X. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy for adult liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2021;23(3):344–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.030 (Epub 2020 Dec 3 PMID: 33281079).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mohiuddin K, Swanson SJ. Maximizing the benefit of minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108(5):315–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23398 (Epub 2013 Aug 23 PMID: 24037974).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Minimally invasive hepatic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2016;96(2):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2015.12.004 (Epub 2016 Feb 17 PMID: 27017866).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cherqui D, Soubrane O, Husson E, Barshasz E, Vignaux O, Ghimouz M, Branchereau S, Chardot C, Gauthier F, Fagniez PL, Houssin D. Laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy for liver transplantation in children. Lancet. 2002;359(9304):392–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07598-0 (PMID: 11844509).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5(4):281–9. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Han HS, Cho JY, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G, Okajima H, Uemoto S, Soubrane O, Yong CC, Chen CL, Cheung TT, Belli G, Kubo S, Wu YM, Chen KH, Troisi RI, Kwon CHD, Suh KS, Soin AS, Kim KH, Cherqui D. Expert panel statement on laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy. Dig Surg. 2018;35(4):284–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000479242 (Epub 2017 Oct 20 PMID: 29050033).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cherqui D, Ciria R, Kwon CHD, Kim KH, Broering D, Wakabayashi G, Samstein B, Troisi RI, Han HS, Rotellar F, Soubrane O, Briceño J, Alconchel F, Ayllón MD, Berardi G, Cauchy F, Luque IG, Hong SK, Yoon YY, Egawa H, Lerut J, Lo CM, Rela M, Sapisochin G, Suh KS. Expert consensus guidelines on minimally invasive donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation from innovation to implementation: a joint initiative from the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA). Ann Surg. 2021;273(1):96–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004475 (PMID: 33332874).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Almodhaiberi H, Kim SH, Kim KH. Totally laparoscopic living donor left hepatectomy for liver transplantation in a child. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5692-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Briceno J, Ciria R, López P, Luque A, Arjona-Sanchez A, Sánchez-Hidalgo JM, Ayllón MD, Gómez-Luque I, Gomez J. Laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy for pediatric liver transplantation: the first 7 cases in Spain. Transplant Proc. 2019;51(1):56–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rhu J, Choi GS, Kwon CHD, Kim JM, Joh JW. Learning curve of laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2020;107(3):278–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11350 (Epub 2019 Oct 25 PMID: 31652003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang JD, Lee KW, Kim JM, Kim MS, Lee JG, Kang KJ, Choi DL, Kim BW, Ryu JH, Kim DS, Hwang S, Choi IS, Cho JY, Nah YW, You YK, Hong G, Yu HC. A comparative study of postoperative outcomes between minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy and open living donor hepatectomy: the Korean organ transplantation registry. Surgery. 2021;170(1):271–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.002 (Epub 2021 Apr 10 PMID: 33846007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Giulianotti PC, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H, Bianco F, Spaggiari M, Oberholzer J, Benedetti E. Robot-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy. Transpl Int. 2012;25(1):e5-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01373.x (Epub 2011 Oct 27 PMID: 22029717).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. • Rho SY, Lee JG, Joo DJ, Kim MS, Kim SI, Han DH, Choi JS, Choi GH. Outcomes of robotic living donor right hepatectomy from 52 consecutive cases: comparison with open and laparoscopy-assisted donor hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2022;275(2):e433-e442. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004067. Manuscript evaluating feasibility and safety of minimally invasive living-donor right hepatectomy, especially RLDRH, from a relatively large donor cohort. The authors also evaluate donor satisfaction of a pure minimally invasive approach compared with other techniques, conventional open donor right hepatectomy and laparoscopy-assisted donor right hepatectomy.

  52. • Broering DC, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y, Zidan A, Elsarawy A, Saleh Y, Alabbad S, Sturdevant M, Wu YM, Troisi RI. Robotic Versus Open Right Lobe Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Liver Transpl. 2020;26(11):1455–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25820Propensity score-matched analysis comparing outcomes amongst robotic right living donor hepatectomy with a similar cohort undergoing open right lobe donor hepatectomy. With a significant number of robotic cases and strong statistical analysis, this manuscript is of great interest for characterization of this innovative technique.

  53. Troisi RI, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y, Zidan A, Sturdevant M, Alabbad S, Algoufi T, Shagrani M, Broering DC. Safety and feasibility report of robotic-assisted left lateral sectionectomy for pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a comparative analysis of learning curves and mastery achieved with the laparoscopic approach. Transplantation. 2021;105(5):1044–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003332 (PMID: 32467479).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rela M, Rajalingam R, Shetty G, Cherukuru R, Rammohan A. Robotic monosegment donor hepatectomy for pediatric liver transplantation: first report. Pediatr Transplant. 2022;26(1):e14110. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rotellar F, Ciria R, Wakabayashi G, Suh KS, Cherqui D, WS-MIDH collaborative group. World survey on minimally invasive donor hepatectomy: a global snapshot of current practices in 2370 cases. Transplantation. 2022;106(1):96–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Andres Ramos for providing assistance with the illustrations in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NG participated in conception and design of the manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript. Material preparation, data collection and the literature search were performed by PV. The manuscript draft and final version was written by PV and NG. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Goldaracena.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Liver Transplantation

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vargas, P.A., Goldaracena, N. Right vs Left Hepatectomy for LDLT, Safety and Regional Preference. Curr Transpl Rep 9, 240–249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-022-00386-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-022-00386-x

Keywords

Navigation