Skip to main content
Log in

TADC: a new three-axis detumbling mode control approach

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new three-axis detumbling mode control approach, namely TADC in the present research, is investigated to deal with a spacecraft, in a short period of time. In a word, the study considers the problem of detumbling by means of system modelling, while the proposed control approach in agreement with the simulation results can be of novelty with respect to the other related potential benchmarks. The approach proposed here plays an important role in this area to adjust angular velocities in the three axes regarding the system under control to be desirable. In some cases, to guarantee the system stability in the process of missions, the whole of angular velocities are to be accurate. In fact, it aims us to organize a number of programmed maneuvers including the orbital, the thermal and so on to be efficient. The idea behind the approach is organized in line with a linear control approach, since the pulse-width pulse-frequency modulator is employed in association with the control allocation to cope with a set of on–off thrusters. Hereinafter, the number of these on–off thrusters may be increased with respect to the investigated control laws to provide overall accurate performance of the spacecraft through the control allocation. The effectiveness of the approach investigated here is finally considered by organizing four scenarios of the experiments and also comparing the outcomes with a number of potential benchmarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin Y-Y, Wang C-T (2014) Detumbling of a rigid spacecraft via torque wheel assisted gyroscopic motion. Acta Astronaut 93:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ovchinnikova MY, Roldugin DS, Penkov VI (2012) Asymptotic study of a complete magnetic attitude control cycle providing a single-axis orientation. Acta Astronaut 77:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Santana AC, Martins-Filho LS, Arantes G Jr (2008) Attitude stabilization of the PMM satellite using a LQG-based control strategy. TEMA Trends Appl Comput Math 9(2):321–330. doi:10.5540/tema.2008.09.02.0321

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang W, Zeng J, Li Y (2013) A review of vehicle system dynamics in the development of high-speed trains in China. Int J Dyn Control 1(1):81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farid Y, Moghaddam TV (2014) Generalized projective synchronization of chaotic satellites problem using linear matrix inequality. Int J Dyn Control 2(4):577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabatini M, Palmerini GB, Leonangeli N, Gasbarri P (2014) Analysis and experiments for delay compensation in attitude control of flexible spacecraft. Acta Astronaut 104(1):276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sidi MJ (1997) Spacecraft dynamics and control, a practical engineering approach, vol 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Zipfel PH (2000) Modeling and simulation of aerospace vehicle dynamics. AIAA, USA

  9. Zheng Z, Song S (2014) Autonomous attitude coordinated control for spacecraft formation with input constraint, model uncertainties, and external disturbances. Chin J Aeronaut 27(3):602–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang H, You X, Xia Y, Liu Z (2014) Nonlinear attitude tracking control for spacecraft formation with multiple delays. Adv Space Res 54(4):759–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huo X, Qinglei H, Xiao B (2014) Finite-time fault tolerant attitude stabilization control for rigid spacecraft. ISA Trans 53(2):241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Du H, Li S (2014) Attitude synchronization control for a group of flexible spacecraft. Automatica 50(2):646–651

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Song Z, Li H, Sun K (2014) Finite-time control for nonlinear spacecraft attitude based on terminal sliding mode technique. ISA Trans 53(1):117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu K, Xia Y (2013) Adaptive attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft with finite-time convergence. Automatica 49(12):3591–3599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y (2012) Spacecraft attitude determination and control: quaternion based method. Annu Rev Control 36(2):198–219

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Zou A-M, Kumar KD (2011) Adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant attitude control of spacecraft. Control Eng Pract 19(1):10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qinglei H, Li B, Zhang Y (2013) Robust attitude control design for spacecraft under assigned velocity and control constraints. ISA Trans 52(4):480–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai H, Huang J (2014) The leader-following attitude control of multiple rigid spacecraft systems. Automatica 50(4):1109–1115

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuo Y-L, Wu T-L (2012) Open-loop and closed-loop attitude dynamics and controls of miniature spacecraft using pseudowheels. Comput Math Appl 64(5):1282–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, Liu X, Zhu Q (2014) Attitude control of rigid spacecraft with disturbance generated by time varying exosystems. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 19(7):2423–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Erdong J, Xiaolei J, Zhaowei S (2008) Robust decentralized attitude coordination control of spacecraft formation. Syst Control Lett 57(7):567–577

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bustan D, Pariz N, Sani SKH (2014) Robust fault-tolerant tracking control design for spacecraft under control input saturation. ISA Trans 53(4):1073–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu K, Xia Y, Fu M (2013) Controller design for rigid spacecraft attitude tracking with actuator saturation. Inf Sci 220(20):343–366

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Pukdeboon C, Zinober ASI (2012) Control Lyapunov function optimal sliding mode controllers for attitude tracking of spacecraft. J Frankl Inst 349(2):456–475

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yongqiang J, Xiangdong L, Wei Q, Chaozhen H (2008) Time-varying sliding mode controls in rigid spacecraft attitude tracking. Chin J Aeronaut 21(4):352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu J, Liu K, Han D (2013) Adaptive sliding mode control for six-DOF relative motion of spacecraft with input constraint. Acta Astronaut 87:64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang Y, Hu Q, Ma G (2010) Adaptive backstepping fault-tolerant control for flexible spacecraft with unknown bounded disturbances and actuator failures. ISA Trans 49(1):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Butyrin SA, Makarov VP, Mukumov RR, Somov Y, Vassilye SN (1997) An expert system for design of spacecraft attitude control systems. Artif Intell Eng 11(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu Q, Zhang J (2014) Relative position finite-time coordinated tracking control of spacecraft formation without velocity measurements. ISA Trans. Corrected Proof, Available online 27 August (in press)

  30. Krovel T (2005) Optimal tuning of PWPF modulator for attitude control. Master’s thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

  31. Johansen TA, Fossen TI (2013) Control allocation—a survey. Automatica 49(5):1087–1103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Zaccarian L (2009) Dynamic allocation for input redundant control systems. Automatica 45(6):1431–1438

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Servidia PA (2010) Control allocation for gimballed/fixed thrusters. Acta Astronaut 66(3–4):587–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author would like to express all the best and the warmest regards to the respected Editor of ‘International Journal of Dynamics and Control (IJDY)’, Springer Publisher, as well as the whole of respected potential reviewers, for suggesting their impressive, constructive and technical comments on the present investigation. Afterwards, Dr. Mazinan is highly grateful to the Islamic Azad University (IAU), South Tehran Brach, Tehran, Iran in support of the present research, which is carried out under contract with the Research Department of the IAU, South Tehran Brach. And also he appreciates Mrs. Maryam Aghaei Sarchali, Miss Mohadeseh Mazinan and finally Mr. Mohammad Mazinan for their sufficient supports in the process of paper investigation and organization.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. H. Mazinan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazinan, A.H., Khalaji, A.R. TADC: a new three-axis detumbling mode control approach. Int. J. Dynam. Control 5, 337–346 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-015-0184-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-015-0184-z

Keywords

Navigation