Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model-based single fault disambiguation and fault tolerant control for a hydraulic drive using receding horizon

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Model-based fault detection and isolation (FDI) needs an analytical model from which residuals can be obtained from a definite cause and effect relationships. The residuals are considered as the fault indicators, which are utilized for root cause analysis via fault signature and parameter estimation. After the disambiguation of fault, the job remains to take a decision in the supervision platform whether the fault can be accommodated (or tolerated) with the existing instrumentation. This applicability of fault tolerant control (FTC) depends upon actuator sizing through system inversion and control law design. In this work, a proven methodology for FDI using bond graph modeling has been applied to an oil hydraulic test bench for isolating a faulty component. The test bench was designed with a provision to inject a fault. After isolation of the faulty component, estimation of faulty parameters, inversion of systems, actuator sizing, and FTC have been addressed. In this paper, a novel fault tolerant control (FTC) using system inversion with due consideration of actuator constraints is reported. In addition, the receding horizon control as FTC has been corroborated through experimentation in a hydraulic drive, where two-step PI control is used to comply with actuator constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Åström K, Albertos P, Blanke M, Isidori A et al (2001) Control of complex systems. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blanke M, Kinnaert M, Lunze J, Staroswiecki M (2003) Diagnosis and fault-tolerant control. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Karnopp D, Margolis DL, Rosenberg RC (2006) Systems dynamics, modeling and simulation of mechatronic systems, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mukherjee A, Karmakar R, Samantaray AK (2006) Bond graph in modeling, simulation and fault identification. I. K International, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borutzky W (2010) Bond graph methodology, development and analysis of multidisciplinary dynamic system models. Springer, London. ISBN 978-1-84882-8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borutzky W (2011) Bond graph modelling of engineering systems, theory, applications and software support. Springer, New York. ISBN 978-1-4419-9367-0

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouamama BO, Samantaray AK, Staroswiecki M, Dauphin-Tanguy G (2003) Derivation of constraint relations from bond graph models for fault detection and isolation. Proc ICBGM’03 35(2):104–109

    Google Scholar 

  8. Samantaray AK, Medjaher K, Bouamama BO, Staroswiecki M, Dauphin-Tanguy G (2004) Component based modelling of thermo-fluid systems for sensor placement and fault detection. Simulation 80(8):381–398

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bouamama BO, Samantaray AK, Medjaher K, Staroswiecki M, Dauphin-Tanguy G (2005) Model builder using functional and bond graph tools for FDI design. Control Eng Pract 13(7):875–891

    Google Scholar 

  10. Samantaray AK, Medjaher K, Bouamama BO, Staroswiecki M, Dauphin-Tanguy G (2006) Diagnostic bond graphs for online fault detection and isolation. Simul Model Pract Theory 14(3):237–262

    Google Scholar 

  11. Medjaher K, Samantaray AK, Bouamama BO, Staroswiecki M (2006) Supervision of an industrial steam generator. Part II: Online implementation. Control Eng Pract 14(1):85–96

    Google Scholar 

  12. Samantaray AK, Bouamama BO (2008) Model-based process supervision: a bond graph approach. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghoshal SK, Samanta S (2011) Robust fault diagnosis and prognostics of a hoisting mechanism: a simulation study (ISSN: 0975-5462). Int J Eng Sci Technol 3(2):962–980

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghoshal SK, Paul S, Samanta S, Tripathi JP (2016) System identification and multi fault isolation for a hydraulic drive with pump loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 230(4):427–440. doi:10.1177/1748006X16655672

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watton J (1989) Fluid power systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dasgupta K, Watton J, Pan S (2006) Open-loop dynamic performance of a servo-valve controlled motor transmission system with pump loading using steady-state characteristics. Mech Mach Theory 41:262–282

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarkar BK, Das J, Saha R, Mookherjee S, Sanyal D (2013) Approaching servoclass tracking performance by a proportional valve-controlled system. Trans Mechatron IEEE/ASME 18(4):1425–1430

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hippalgaonkar R, Ivantysynova M (2013) A Series-Parallel hydraulic hybrid mini-excavator with displacement controlled actuators. Proceedings of the 13th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP2013, Linköping, Sweden, pp 31–42

  19. Samantaray AK, Ghoshal SK, Chakraborty S, Mukherjee A (2005) Improvements to single fault isolation using estimated parameters. Simul Trans Soc Model Simul Int 81(12):827–845

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirschorn RM (1979) Invertibility of multivariable nonlinear control systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 24(6):855–865

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Manring ND, Luecke GR (1998) Modeling and designing a hydrostatic transmission with a fixed-displacement motor. J Dynam Syst Meas Control 120:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kugi A, Schlacher K, Aitzetmüller H, Hirmann G (2000) Modeling and simulation of a hydrostatic transmission with variable-displacement pump. Math Comput Simul 53:409–414

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chinniah Y, Burton R, Habibi S (2006) Failure monitoring in a high performance hydrostatic actuation system using the extended Kalman filter. Mechatronics 16:643–653

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mukherjee A, Samantaray AK (2001) System modelling through bond graph objects on SYMBOLS 2000. Proceedings ICBGM’01 ISBN: 1-56555-103-6. Simul Ser 33(1):164–170

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ngwompo RF, Scavarda S, Thomasset D (1996) Inversion of linear time-invariant SISO systems modelled by bond graph. J Franklin Inst 333(2):157–174

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ngwompo RF, Gawthrop PJ (1999) Bond graph-based simulation of non-linear inverse systems using physical performance specifications. J Franklin Inst 336(8):1225–1247

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Ngwompo RF, Scavarda S, Thomasset D (2001) Physical model-based inversion in control systems design using bond graph representation—part 1: theory. Proc Inst Mech Eng part I J Syst Control Eng 215:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ngwompo RF, Scavarda S, Thomasset D (2001) Physical model-based inversion in control systems design using bond graph representation—part 2, applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 215:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  29. Samantaray AK, Ghoshal SK (2008) Bicausal bond graphs for supervision: From fault detection and isolation to fault accommodation. J Franklin Inst 345:1–28

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogata K (2010) Modern control engineering, 5th edn. Pearson Education Inc, New Jersey, pp 568–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Asansol Engineering College, Asansol, West Bengal, 713305, India

    Sarnendu Paul

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, 826004, India

    Sanjoy K. Ghoshal

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. B.C Roy Engineering College, Durgapur, West Bengal, 713206, India

    Subrata Samanta

  4. Department of Mining Machinery Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, 826004, India

    Jayanta Das

Authors
  1. Sarnendu Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanjoy K. Ghoshal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Subrata Samanta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jayanta Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjoy K. Ghoshal.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Kátia Lucchesi Cavalca Dedini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paul, S., Ghoshal, S.K., Samanta, S. et al. Model-based single fault disambiguation and fault tolerant control for a hydraulic drive using receding horizon. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 39, 2405–2419 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0754-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0754-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation