Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation study of structure crack propagation under random load based on multiple factors correction

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the phenomenon of fracture damage is a common failure mode of equipment, the reliability evaluation and residual life prediction have become a hot-spot. And the precise estimation of crack propagation has become necessary. The common estimation study of crack propagation for structure under random load takes less influence factor into consideration, and cannot be quantitatively corrected by influence factors at the same time. An estimation approach of structure crack propagation is raised by combining the estimation approach of fatigue life, based on multiple factors correction with the threshold criterion of opening stress and closure stress. And the crack propagation of instance structure under the loading spectrum of single-peak overloading and the loading spectrum of multi-peak overloading are estimated. Also, the results estimated by corrected estimation approach are compared with the results estimated by fracture mechanics and the test data using acoustic emission device. Further, the probabilistic method based on Weibull distribution is selected as the statistical framework to evaluate the precision of corrected estimation approach. And the probability density of results estimated by corrected approach and results estimated by fracture mechanics is calculated by the probability density function. It can be shown from the comparisons that the result estimated by the corrected approach is more precise than the result estimated by fracture mechanics, which is more close to the test data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fatemi A, Shamsaei N (2011) Multiaxial fatigue: an overview and some approximation models for life estimation. Int J Fatigue 33(8):948–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ibrahim RA (2015) Overview of structural life assessment and reliability, part i: basic ingredients of fracture mechanics. J Shp Prod Dsgn 31(1):1–42

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chudnovsky A (2014) Slow crack growth, its modeling and crack-layer approach: a review. Int J Eng Sci 83:6–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Sines G, Ohgi G (1981) Fatigue criteria under combined stresses or strains. J Eng Mater Technol 103(2):82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiang Y, Lu Z, Liu Y (2010) Crack growth-based fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw model. Part I: uniaxial loading. Int J Fatigue 32(2):341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Mahadevan S (2005) Strain based multiaxial fatigue damage modelling. Fatigue Fract Eng M 28(12):1177–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang JK, Cheng XQ, Li ZN (2010) Total fatigue life prediction for Ti-alloys airframe structure based on durability and damage-tolerant design concept. Mater Design 31(9):4329–4335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang YY, Yao WX (2004) Evaluation and comparison of several multiaxial fatigue criteria. Int J Fatigue 26(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu H, Shang DG, Liu JZ et al (2015) Fatigue life prediction based on equivalent stresses for laser beam welded 6156 Al alloy joints under variable amplitude loading. Fatigue Fract Eng M 38(8):997–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Servetti G, Zhang X (2009) Predicting fatigue crack growth rate in a welded butt joint: the role of effective R ratio in accounting for residual stress effect. Eng Fract Mech 76(11):1589–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu L, Jia MP, Shi GL et al (2015) Estimation approach of structural fatigue life based on multiple factors correction. J Southeast Univ Ntrl sci Edit 45(3):469–473

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi GL, Zhu L, Wang RG (2015) The fatigue life analysis for the cage of overrunning clutch based on multiple factors correction. Mach Dsgn and Res 31(2):70–73, 76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cui WC (2002) Relation between crack growth rate curve and S–N curve for metal fatigue. J shp mechanics 6(6):93–106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lam TS, Topper TH, Conle FA (1998) Derivation of crack closure and crack growth rate data from effective-strain fatigue life data for fracture mechanics fatigue life predictions. Int J Fatigue 20(10):703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cui WC, Huang XP (2009) A general constitutive relation for fatigue crack growth analysis of metal structures. Acta Metall Sin 16(5):342–354

    Google Scholar 

  16. Varvani-Farahani A, Kodric T, Ghahramani A (2005) A method of fatigue life prediction in notched and un-notched components. J Mater Process Technol 169(1):94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrucci G, Zuccarello B (2004) Fatigue life prediction under wide band random loading. Fatigue Fract Eng M 27(12):1183–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang W, Liu Y (2012) In situ SEM testing for crack closure investigation and virtual crack annealing model development. Int J Fatigue 43:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kotousov A, Chang D (2015) Theoretical and experimental study of fatigue growth of interacting cracks. Int J Fatigue 70:130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickard AC (2014) Fatigue crack propagation in biaxial stress fields. The J Strain Anls Eng Dsgn 50(1):25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gholizadeh S, Leman Z, Baharudin B (2015) A review of the application of acoustic emission technique in engineering. Struct Eng Mech 54(6):1075–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aggelis DG, Kordatos EZ, Matikas TE (2011) Acoustic emission for fatigue damage characterization in metal plates. Mech Res Commun 38(2):106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niri ED, Salamone S (2012) A probabilistic framework for acoustic emission source localization in plate-like structures. VTT Symp 21(3):35–46

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miesowicz K, Staszewski WJ, Korbiel T (2016) Analysis of Barkhausen noise using wavelet-based fractal signal processing for fatigue crack detection. Int J Fatigue 83:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuadra J, Vanniamparambil PA, Servansky D et al (2015) Acoustic emission source modeling using a data-driven approach. J Snd Vib 341:222–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kovač J, Legat A, Zajec B, Kosec T et al (2015) Detection and characterization of stainless steel SCC by the analysis of crack related acoustic emission. Ultrasonics 62:312–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu J, Ziehl P, Zárate B et al (2011) Prediction of fatigue crack growth in steel bridge components using acoustic emission. J Constr Steel Res 67(8):1254–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gagnon M, Tahan A, Bocher P et al (2013) A probabilistic model for the onset of high cycle fatigue (HCF) crack propagation: application to hydroelectric turbine runner. Int J Fatigue 47:300–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Effertz PS, Infante V, Quintino L et al (2016) Fatigue life assessment of friction spot welded 7050-T76 aluminium alloy using Weibull distribution. Int J Fatigue 87:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hosking JRM, Wallis JR, Wood EF (1985) Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments. Technometrics 27(3):251–261

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research described in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51675098 and 51075070), Chinese Specialized Research Foundation for Doctoral program of Higher Education (Grant No. 20130092110003) and Graduate student research innovation Foundation of Jiangsu province (Grant No. KYLX15-0059). We gratefully appreciate the support agencies. Besides, we express our sincere thanks to the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions for the improvement of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-ping Jia.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Kátia Lucchesi Cavalca Dedini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Jia, Mp. Estimation study of structure crack propagation under random load based on multiple factors correction. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 39, 681–693 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0654-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0654-z

Keywords

Navigation