Abstract
The present paper describes the efforts on the construction of a computational framework for 2-D and 3-D aerodynamic optimizations. The creation of the framework is an attempt to generate a design environment capable of coupling various tools from different levels of complexity and with diverse functionalities. The conceptual framework is developed to be inserted into daily activities of an aerodynamic computational fluid dynamics group. The framework is implemented for both Windows and Linux-running platforms, and it is augmented by a user-friendly graphical interface. Usage of the framework is illustrated in the paper by 2-D and 3-D aerodynamic optimization of cruise configurations for different flight conditions. The test cases addressed mainly have the objective of demonstrating that the proposed framework is a useful tool for aerodynamic optimization applications. The aspects investigated include the influence on the aerodynamic coefficients of the methodology used for configuration parameterization and the benefits of the solver fidelity level as compared to the computational cost. Moreover, the use of a neural network is evaluated to analyze the benefits that this methodology can bring to the implemented framework in terms of computational cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antoine N, Kroo I (2005) Framework for aircraft conceptual design and environmental performance studies. AIAA J 43(10):2100–2109
Deb K (2003) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York
Reklaitis GV, Ravindran A, Ragdell KM (1983) Engineering optimization methods and applications. Wiley, New York
Mokhtar BS, Shetty CM (1979) Nonlinear programming. Theory and algorithms. Wiley, New York
Schrijver A (1998) Theory of linear and integer programming. Wiley, New York
Hestenes MR, Stiefel E (1952) Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. J Res Natl Bur Stand 49(6):409–436
Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Adami C (1998) Introduction to artificial life. Springer, New York
Dorigo M, Di Caro G (1999) The ant colony optimization meta-heuristic. In: Corne D, Dorigo M, Glover F (eds) New ideas in optimization, Chapter 2. McGraw-Hill, London, UK, pp 11–32
Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, New York
Goldberg DE, Deb K (1991) A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. In: Rawlins GJE (ed) Foundations of genetic algorithms. Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA, pp 69–93
Herrara F, Lozano M, Verdegay JL (1998) Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms: operators and tools for behavioural analysis. Artificial intelligence review 12(4):265–319
Mortenson ME (1985) Geometric modeling. Wiley, New York
Kulfan BM, Bussoletti JE “‘Fundamental’ parametric geometry representation for aircraft component shapes,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-6948. Proceedings of the 11th AIAA/AISMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, Sept. 2006
Sobieczky H (1999) Parametric airfoils and wings, recent development of aerodynamic design methodologies. In: Inverse design and optimization. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft, Braunschweig
Ansys Inc., ICEM-CFD ™. http://www.icemcfd.com/
Silva ALFS, Oliveira JAN, Antunes AP, Mendonça MT, Azevedo JLF, Silveira AN Numerical study of two-dimensional high-lift configurations using the MSES code. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering-COBEM 2005, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil, Nov. 2005
Antunes AP, da Silva RG, Azevedo JLF A study of different mesh generation approaches to capture aerodynamic coefficients for high-lift configurations. Proceedings of the 27th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, France, Sept. 2010
Antunes AP, Azevedo JLF, da Silva RG “Numerical simulations of turbulent flow over a high-lift configuration” AIAA Paper No. 2011-3006. Proceedings of the 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 2011
Antunes AP, Azevedo JLF, da Silva RG “Influence of high-lift supporting systems on the trapezoidal wing aerodynamic coefficients” AIAA Paper No. 2012-2846, Proceedings of the 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 2012
Fluent Inc. (2001) Fluent 6.0 User’s Guide
Metacomp Technologies Inc., CFD++. http://www.metacomptech.com/
Harold Youngren Aerocraft Inc.. http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil
Drela M (1996) A user’s guide to MSES 2.95. MIT Computational Aerospace Sciences Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Karas OV, Kovalev VE (2002) BLWF 43 User’s Guide
Damm RB “A qualitative study of the genetic algorithm” Master of Science Dissertation, Applied Mathematics Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2005 (in Portuguese, original title is “Um Estudo Qualitativo do Algoritmo Genético”)
Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput 8(2):173–195
Fonseca CM, Fleming PJ (1998) Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms-part II: application example. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 28:38–47
Schaffer JD “Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. In: Grefensttete JJ (ed) Hillsdale, New Jersey, July 1987, pp 93–100
Gong M, Jiao M, Du H, Bo L (2008) Multiobjective immune algorithm with nondominated neighbor-based selection. Evol Comput 16(2):225–255
Suganthan P, Hansen N, Liang JJ, Deb K, Chen YP, Auger A., Tiwari S “Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC-2005: special session on real-parameter optimization”, Kanpur Genetic Algorithm Laboratory Report Number 2005005, Kanpur, India, 2005
Goldberg DE, Deb K, Clark JH (1992) Genetic algorithms, noise, and the sizing of populations. In: Complex systems, vol 6. Complex Systems Publication, Champaign, IL
Antunes AP (2014) “Development of an open optimization framework for aeronautical applications,” Doctor of Science Thesis, Computer Science Division, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil
Esteco Inc. ModeFRONTIER. http://www.esteco.com/
Coello CAC, Lamont GB (2004) Applications of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. World Scientific, New Jersey
Antunes AP, Azevedo JLF (2014) Studies in aerodynamic optimization based on genetic algorithms. J Aircraft, vol. 51, no. 3, pp 1002–1012
Spalart PR, Allmaras SR “A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows,” AIAA Paper No. 92-0439. 30th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan. 1992
Fausett L (1989) Fundamentals of neural networks—architectures, algorithms, and applications. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Montgomery DC (2000) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the partial support for this research provided by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq, under the Research Grants No. 309985/2013-7, No. 400844/2014-1 and No. 443839/2014-0. The authors are also indebted to the partial financial support received from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP, under the Research Grant No. 2013/07375-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: F. A. Rochinha.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Antunes, A.P., Azevedo, J.L.F. An aerodynamic optimization computational framework using genetic algorithms. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 1037–1058 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0445-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0445-y