Skip to main content
Log in

Longitudinal stability and control augmentation with robustness and handling qualities requirements using the two degree of freedom controller

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a practical design of longitudinal stability and control augmentation system (SCAS) using a two degree of freedom (TDOF) controller. It is based on the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) technique in the frequency domain, via spectral factorization. The controller exhibits robustness to plant uncertainties, related with variation due to different operation conditions, and incorporates various aircraft handling qualities (HQ) requirements to comply with certification authority’s requests. The project results in an unique set of fixed gain TDOF controller for a plant dynamics which changes with a \(V_{\text {CAS}}\times x_{\text {cg}}\) envelope. The project is done aiming at the industrial implementation of TDOF controller in fly-by-wire aircrafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm.

  2. Adapted from http://www.wpclipart.com/transportation/aircraft/jet

Abbreviations

\(x_{cg}\) :

Center of gravity (%)

\(\omega _{n}\) :

Natural frequency (rad/s)

\(\phi\) :

Roll angle (rad)

\(\theta\) :

Pitch angle (rad)

\(\psi\) :

Yaw angle (rad)

p :

Roll rate (rad/s)

q :

Pitch rate (rad/s)

r :

Yaw rate (rad/s)

\(V_{\text {CAS}}\) :

Calibrated airspeed (knots)

\(V_{\text {TAS}}\) :

True airspeed (m/s)

\(\mathbf {V}\) :

Velocity vector (m/s)

\(\alpha\) :

Attack angle (rad)

\(\beta\) :

Sideslip angle (rad)

\(\gamma\) :

Flight path angle (rad)

\(\delta _{e}\) :

Elevator angle (rad)

\(\tau\) :

Delay of sensor (ms)

\(\tau _{p}\) :

Phase delay criteria (s)

\(\zeta\) :

Damping factor (dimensionless)

j :

Imaginary number (dimensionless)

\(\rho\), \(\sigma\) :

Weighting factors (dimensionless)

\(\kappa\) :

Steady state gain (dimensionless)

\(\hat{q}(s)\), h(s), k(s):

Controller gains (dimensionless)

\(x_{s}\) :

x axis stability coordinate system (dimensionless)

\(x_{\omega }\) :

x axis wind coordinate system (dimensionless)

\(x_{b}\) :

x axis body coordinate system (dimensionless)

References

  1. Holzapfel F, Heller M, Weingartner M, Sachs G, da Costa O (2006) Development of control laws for the simulation of a new transport aircraft. In: 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences

  2. Stevens BL, Lewis FL (2003) Aircraft control and simulation, 2nd Edn. Wiley, New York, USA

  3. Leithead W (1999) Survey of gain scheduling: analysis and design. Int J Control 73:1001–1025

  4. Nair VG, Dileep MV, George VI (2012) Aircraft yaw control system using lqr and fuzzy logic controller. Int J Comput Appl 9(45):25–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Akyazi O, Usta MA, Akpinar AS (2012) A self-tuning fuzzy logic controller for aircraft roll control system. Int J Control Sci Eng 6(2):181–188 doi: 10.5923/j.control.20120206.06

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saussié D, Akhrif O, Saydy L (2005) Longitudinal flight control design with handling quality requirements. Département de génie électrique École Polytenchique de Montréal et École de Technologie Superieure, Janvier

  7. Townsend BK (1986) The application of quadratic optimal cooperative control synthesis to a CH-47 Helicopter, 1st edn. NASA Technical Memorandum 88353

  8. Gangsaas D, Bruce K R, Blight JD, Ly UL (1986) Application of modern synthesis to aircraft control: three casestudies. IEEE Trans Autom Control:995–1014

  9. Aouf N, Boulet B, Botez R (2002) A gain scheduling approach for a flexible aircraft. Proceeding of the American Control Conference, pp 4439–4442

  10. Gangsaas D, Hodgkinson J, Harden C (2008) Multidisciplinary control law design and flight test demonstration on a business jet. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, pp 1–25

  11. da Silva ASF, Paiva HM, Kienitz KH (2011) A methodology to assess robust stability and robust performance of automatic flight control systems. Rev Bras Controle Autom 22(5):429–440

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hassani K, Lee WS (2014) Optimal tunning of linear quadratic regulators using quantum particle swarm optimization. Procedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamics and Robotics, pp 1–8

  13. Siqueira D, Moreira FJO, PaglioneP (2007) Robust flight control design supported by flying qualities analysis. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, South Carolina, pp 1–8

  14. Wolovich WA (1994) Automatic control systems: basic analysis and design, 2nd edn. The oxford Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering Series. Saunders College Pub, New York

  15. Zhou K, Doyle JC (1997) Essentials of robust control, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  16. Vargas FJT ,de Pieri ER, Castelan EB (2004) Identification and friction compensation for an industrial robot using two degrees of freedom controllers. In: ICARCV, IEEE, pp 1146–1151

  17. Vargas FJT (2004) Experimental implementation of robust and intelligent controllers in trajectory control of industrial scara robot. In: KaGnicheM (ed) Student Forum, IFIP 18 th World Computer Congress-Student Forum, 22–27 August 2004, Toulouse, France, Kluwer, pp 415–428

  18. Duke EL, Antoniewicz RF, Krambeer KD (1988) Derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model, 1st edn. NASA Reference Publication 1207, USA

  19. Stengel RF (2004) Flight dynamics, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

  20. MIL-F-8785C (1980) Flying qualities of piloted airplanes, Military Norm

  21. Tischler MB (1996) Advancesin aircraft flight control, 1st edn. Taylorand Francis Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. AGARD/NATO (1991) Handling qualities of unstable highly augmentated aircraft. Advisory report, Research and Technology, North Atlantic Treaty Organization

  23. David KA (1996) Comparison of the control anticipation parameter and the bandwidth criterion during the landing task. In: Master degree Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to Daniel Siqueira for HQ’s templates, to seniors engineers Paulo Donato and Michel McSharry for the text reviews and finally to EMBRAER and ITA for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. Triveno Vargas.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Glauco A. de P. Caurin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vargas, F.J.T., de Oliveira Moreira, F.J. & Paglione, P. Longitudinal stability and control augmentation with robustness and handling qualities requirements using the two degree of freedom controller. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 1843–1853 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0444-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0444-z

Keywords

Navigation