Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prevalence of incisor hypomineralisation and its relationship with the prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation

  • Original Scientific Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To establish the prevalence of incisor hypomineralisation (IH) in a cohort of 12-year-old children in Northern England and to relate the prevalence to gender, socioeconomic status, and the prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH).

Method

The study population comprised 12-year-old children participating in the 2008–2009 National Dental Epidemiological Programme in five regions in Northern England. Participating dentists were trained and calibrated in the use of the modified Developmental Defects of Enamel Index. Children were examined at school under direct vision with the aid of a dental mirror. First permanent molars and incisors were recorded for the presence and type of enamel defects greater than 2 mm. A diagnosis of MIH was ascribed to any child with a demarcated defect in any first permanent molar. A diagnosis of IH was ascribed to any child with a demarcated defect in an incisor but with molar sparing.

Results

3,233 children were examined. The prevalence of IH was 11.0 % (95 % CI 11.0–12.2 %). There was a strong positive correlation between the prevalence of MIH and IH in different regions which reached significance (r = 0.9, p = 0.037) according to Spearman’s rho test of correlation. There was a similar pattern of prevalence in the different socioeconomic quintiles although this correlation did not reach significance. The most common teeth affected in IH were the maxillary central incisors, followed by the maxillary lateral incisors and followed by the mandibular incisors. There was no difference in the prevalence of IH by gender.

Conclusions

The prevalence of IH was 11.0 %. The variation of prevalence between regions and socioeconomic groups and the distribution of lesions in the teeth were very similar to observations seen in MIH children from the same cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnadottir IB, Sigurjons H, Holbrook WP. Enamel opacities in 8-year-old Icelandic children in relation to their medical history as infants. Community Dent Health. 2005;22:279–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer R, Toumba J, Godson J, Duggal M. The prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation in Northern England and its relationship to socioeconomic status and water fluoridation. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2012;22:250–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson J, O’Mullane D. A modified DDE Index for use in epidemiological studies of enamel defects. J Dent Res. 1989;68:445–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of Oral Health Research and Epidemiology. A review of the developmental defects of enamel index (DDE Index) Report of an FDI Working Group. Int Dent J. 1992;42:411–26.

  • Cutress TW, Suckling GW, Pearce EI, Ball ME. Defects of tooth enamel in children in fluoridated and non-fluoridated water areas of the Auckland region. NZ Dent J. 1985;81:12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfrink ME, Ten Cate JM, Jaddoe VW, et al. Deciduous molar hypomineralization and molar incisor hypomineralization. J Dent Res. 2012;91:551–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flores MT. Traumatic injuries in the primary dentition. Dent Traumatol. 2002;18:287–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanim A, Morgan M, Marino R, Bailey D, Manton D. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation: prevalence and defect characteristics in Iraqi children. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2011;21:413–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalevik B, Klingberg G, Barregard L, Noren JG. The prevalence of demarcated opacities in permanent first molars in a group of Swedish children. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59:255–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanagaratnam S, Schluter P, Durward C, Mahood R, Mackay T. Enamel defects and dental caries in 9-year-old children living in fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas of Auckland, New Zealand. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37:250–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalloo R. Risk factors for major injuries to the face and teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2003;19:12–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcenes W, Murray S. Social deprivation and traumatic dental injuries among 14-year-old schoolchildren in Newham, London. Dent Traumatol. 2001;17:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milsom K, Mitropoulos CM. Enamel defects in 8-year-old children in fluoridated and non-fluoridated parts of Cheshire. Caries Res. 1990;24:286–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NHS Dental Epidemiological Oral Health Survey of 12 year old children in England 2008/2009 National Protocol. http://www.nwph.net/dentalhealth/survey-results-12.aspx (2008) Accessed Jun 2013.

  • Reid DJ, Dean MC. Variation in modern human enamel formation times. J Hum Evol. 2006;50:329–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soviero V, Haubek D, Trindade C, Da MT, Poulsen S. Prevalence and distribution of demarcated opacities and their sequelae in permanent 1st molars and incisors in 7 to 13-year-old Brazilian children. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67:170–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suckling GW, Herbison GP, Brown RH. Etiological factors influencing the prevalence of developmental defects of dental enamel in nine-year-old New Zealand children participating in a health and development study. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1466–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Von Arx T. Developmental disturbances of permanent teeth following trauma to the primary dentition. Aust Dent J. 1993;38:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerheijm KL, Duggal M, Mejare I, et al. Judgement criteria for molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European meeting on MIH held in Athens, 2003. Eur J Paediatri Dent. 2003;4:110–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • William V, Messer LB, Burrow MF. Molar incisor hypomineralization: review and recommendations for clinical management. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28:224–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott NS, Bryan RAE, Duggal MS. Molar-incisor-hypomineralisation: a literature review. Eur Arch Paediatri Dent. 2008;9:172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zawaideh FI, Al-Jundi SH, Al-Jaljoli MH. Molar incisor hypomineralisation: prevalence in Jordanian children and clinical characteristics. Eur Arch Paediatri Dent. 2011;12:31–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Balmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balmer, R., Toumba, K.J., Munyombwe, T. et al. The prevalence of incisor hypomineralisation and its relationship with the prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 16, 265–269 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-014-0171-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-014-0171-7

Keywords

Navigation