Abstract
This paper offers a comprehensive assessment of network-based positioning results using GPS-only and combined GPS/GLONASS data under open to limited sky view conditions. Data analysis is performed in a short (4 h) and a long (24 h) term spanning observations from five GNSS stations using 10°, 20°, 30° and 40° elevation cut-off angles, which simulate the availability of satellites in different sky view conditions. Evaluation of the results reveals insignificant differences between the accuracy of the GPS-only and combined GPS/GLONASS solutions for daily observation in all sky view conditions. However the clear advantage of integrating GPS and GLONASS observation in a GNSS differential solution is apparent for short (4 h) observation periods, particularly at the highest elevation cut-off angle (40°).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcay S, Inal C, Yigit CO, Yetkin M (2012) Comparing glonass-only with GPS-only and hybrid positioning in various length of baselines, acta Geod. Geop Hung 47:1–12. doi:10.1556/AGeod.47.2012.1.1
Alkan RM, Ilci V, Ozulu IM, Saka MH (2015) A comparative study for accuracy assessment of PPP technique using GPS and GLONASS in urban areas. Measurement 69:1–8
Al-Shaery A, Lim S, Rizos C (2011) Assessment of network-based positioning performance using GPS alone versus GPS and GLONASS combined. In: Proceedings of the 24th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GNSS 2011), Portland, OR, September 2011, pp 2341–2349
Bruyninx C (2007) Comparing GPS-only with GPS + GLONASS positioning in a regional permanent GNSS network. GPS Solut 11:97–106
Choy S, Zhang S, Lahaye F, Héroux P (2013) A comparison between GPS-only and combined GPS + GLONASS precise point positioning. J Spatial Sci 58:169–190. doi:10.1080/14498596.2013.808164
Dach R, Fridez P (2016) Bernese GNSS software version 5.2 Tutorial. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern
Dach R, Lutz S, Walser P, Fridez P (2015) Bernese GNSS software version 5.2, user manual. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern
Dawidowicz K, Krzan G (2014) Coordinate estimation accuracy of static precise point positioning using on-line PPP service, a case study. Acta Geod Geophys 49:37–55. doi:10.1007/s40328-013-0038-0
Leick A (1994) GPS Satellite Surveying, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Martin W, Ladd J (1997) GPS + GLONASS Surveying. Proceeding of ION GPS-97, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Raffaela C, Marco G (2000) Dual Frequency GPS + GLONASS Measurements in the static relative positioning. Boll geod e sci afini 59:391–403
Wang J, Wang J (2007) Comparing long baseline results from GPS and GPS/GLONASS. In: Combined International Symposium & Exhibition on Geoinformation & GNSS, Johor Bahru, 5–7 November CD-ROM procs, paper 59
URL-1 http://igs.org/products
Yigit CO, Gikas V, Alcay S, Ceylan A (2014) Performance evaluation of short to long term GPS/GLONASS and GPS/GLONASS post-processed PPP. Surv Rev 46:155–166. doi:10.1179/1752270613Y.00000000068
Zheng Y, Nie G, Fang R, Yin Q, Yi W, Liu J (2012) Investigation of GLONASS performance in differential positioning. Earth Sci Inf 5:189–199. doi:10.1007/s12145-012-0108-9
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alcay, S., Yigit, C.O. Network based performance of GPS-only and combined GPS/GLONASS positioning under different sky view conditions. Acta Geod Geophys 52, 345–356 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0173-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0173-5