Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Modified Cuckoo Search Algorithm for Improving Voltage Profile and to Diminish Power Losses by Locating Multi-type FACTS Devices

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a cuckoo search (CS) algorithm, a stochastic heuristic algorithm, combined with the most familiar genetic algorithm (GA) to seek optimal location(s) of FACTS devices in a multi-machine power system. The intention of hybridizing GA with CS algorithm is to improve the quality of solution through expanding the search space and speed of convergence. The run time and the required function evaluation number(generations) for acquiring optimum by the modified algorithm are generally smaller than the basic algorithm. Identification of the best location for FACTS is a vital task as they are expensive to use. Here, three emerging and dissimilar kinds of FACTS devices, namely Unified Power Flow Controller, Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor and Interline Power Flow Controller, are chosen for optimum locations and are modeled for steady-state studies. The optimal location and size of these FACTS devices, including installation costs, are computed utilizing the real power losses of the system as the objective function to be minimized. The feasibility of the proposed method is demonstrated for IEEE 30 bus power system network using MATLAB working platform. The results show that the proposed approach, with good stability, has better convergence and the simultaneous use of several kinds of FACTS controllers is the most efficient solution to improve the voltage profile with minimum power loss of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adnan, M. A., & Razzaque, M. A. (2013). A comparative study of particle swarm optimization and cuckoo search techniques through problem-specific distance. In International conference of information and communication technology (ICoICT). doi:10.1109/ICoICT.2013.6574619.

  • Baghaee, H. R., Jannati, M., Vahidi, B. Hosseinian, S. H., & Rastegar, H. (2008). Improvement of voltage stability and reduce power system losses by optimal GA-based allocation of multi-type FACTS devices. In IEEE international conference on optimization of electrical and electronic equipment. doi:10.1109/OPTIM.2008.4602368.

  • Cañizares, C. A., & Faur, Z. T. (1999). Analysis of SVC and TCSC controllers in voltage collapse. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14(1), 158–165.

  • Gerbex, S. Cherkaoui, R., & Germond, A. J. (2003). Optimal location of FACTS devices to enhance power system security. In Power tech conference proceedings, IEEE Bologna. doi:10.1109/PTC.2003.1304363.

  • Gyugyi, L., Sen, K. K., & Schauder, C. D. (1999). The interline power flow controller concept: A new approach to power flow management in transmission systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 14(3), 1115–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, A., Rodriguez, M. A., Torres, E., & Eguia, P. (2013). A review and comparison of FACTS optimal placement for solving transmission system issues. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ), 11.

  • Hingorani, N., & Gyugyi, L. (2000). Understanding FACTS: Concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission systems. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaran, A., & Allirani, A. (2011). Location of FACTS devices for real and reactive power flow control. In International conference on signal, image processing and applications with workshop of ICEEA (Vol. 21, pp. 242–248).

  • Lubis, R. S., & Hadi, S. P. (2012). Tumiran. Selection of suitable location of the FACTS devices for optimal power flow. International Journal of Electrical and Computer, 12(3), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (1999). Introduction to genetic algorithms (Vol. 158). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravej, Z., & Akhlaghi, A. (2013). A novel approach based on cuckoo search for DG allocation in distribution network. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.08.009.

  • Pardalosa, M., Edwin Romeijna, H., & Tuyb, H. (2010). Recent developments and trends in global optimization. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 124, 209–228. doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00425-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabioun, R. (2011). Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 11(8), 5508–5518.

  • Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H., & Saryazdi, S. (2009). GSA: A gravitational search algorithm. Information Sciences, 179(13), 2232–2248.

  • Tabatabaei, N. M., Aghajani, G. H., Boushehri, N. S., & Shoarinejad, S. (2011). Optimal location of FACTS devices using adaptive particle swarm optimization mixed with simulated annealing. International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering, 3(2), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy, M., & Mishra, S. (2011). Interval type-2-based thyristor controlled series capacitor to improve power system stability. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 5(2), 209–222.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, K. S., & Gupta, H. O. (2006). Impact on real and reactive power pricing in open power market using unified power flow controller. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21(1), 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. F. (2003). Modelling of multiple FACTS devices into multi-machine power systems and applications. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. doi:10.1016/S0142-0615(02)00033-9.

  • Yang, X. S., & Deb, S. (2009a). Cuckoo search via Le’vy flights. In Proceedings of world congress on nature and biologically inspired computing (NaBIC 2009 India) (pp. 210–214). USA: IEEE Publications.

  • Yang, X. S., & Deb, S. (2009b). Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In World congress on nature and biologically inspired computing (NaBIC) (pp. 210–214). IEEE Publications.

  • Yang, X. S., Koziel, S., & Leifsson, L. (2014). Computational optimization, modelling and simulation: Past, present and future. In ICCS 2014. 14th international conference on computational science (Vol. 29, pp. 754–758). Elsevier.

  • Yang, X. S. (2013). Multiobjective firefly algorithm for continuous optimization. Engineering with Computers, 29(2), 175–184. doi:10.1007/s00366-012-0254-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. S., & Deb, S. (2010). Engineering optimisation by cuckoo search. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 1(4), 330–343.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. P. (2003). Modelling of the interline power flow controller and the generalised unified power flow controller in Newton power flow. IEEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 150(3), 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siva Sankar Akumalla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akumalla, S.S., Peddakotla, S. & Kuppa, S.R.A. A Modified Cuckoo Search Algorithm for Improving Voltage Profile and to Diminish Power Losses by Locating Multi-type FACTS Devices. J Control Autom Electr Syst 27, 93–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-015-0219-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-015-0219-x

Keywords

Navigation