Skip to main content
Log in

Robust Control of Electromagnetic Levitation System

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlinear \({H}_{\infty }\) control is a promising way of attenuating negative effects of external disturbances in nonlinear systems and is robust against uncertainties of the plant. However, partial differential equation (PDE) obtained from this method rarely can be solved analytically. Thus, some sort of approximation is required. Furthermore, produced controllers by this method using Taylor series approximation (especially higher order controllers) are complicated and hard to implement. In this paper, a robust and nonlinear controller is introduced which combines linear \({H}_{\infty }\) controller and feedback linearization technique. First, a nonlinear state transformation is applied to the nonlinear system such that the resulting system is linear. Next, a linear \({H}_{\infty }\) controller is designed for the feedback linearized system. By this method, approximation is not required in designing \({H}_{\infty }\) controller because for linear systems, resulting PDE is simplified to a Riccati equation. Proposed approach has been applied to a Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) system, and its performance is compared with third-order nonlinear \({H}_{\infty }\) controller to verify the effectiveness and robustness of new method. Simulation results show that proposed controller attenuates external disturbance much better than nonlinear \({H}_{\infty }\), and simultaneously has less control effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Khalaf, M., Huang, J., & Lewis, F. L. (2006). Nonlinear \(H_2/H_{\infty }\) constrained feedback control (1st ed.). London: Springer.

  • Aliyu, M. D. S. (2011). Nonlinear \(H_{\infty }\) control, Hamilton–Jacobi equations. London: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.

  • Al-Muthairi, N. F., & Zribi, F. (2004). Sliding mode control of a magnetic levitation system. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachle, T., Hentzelt, S., & Graichen, K. (2013). Nonlinear model predictive control of a magnetic levitation system. Control Engineering Practice, 21(9), 1250–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bea, R. W. (1998). Successive Galerkin approximation algorithms for nonlinear optimal and robust control. International Journal of Control, 71(5), 717–743.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bittar, A., & Sales, R. M. (1997). \(\text{ H }_{2}\) and \(\text{ H }_{\infty }\) control applied to an electromagnetically levitated vehicle. InProceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (pp. 773–778). Hartford.

  • Chen, S.-Y., Lin, F.-J., & Shyu, K.-K. (2009). Direct decentralized neural control for nonlinear MIMO magnetic levitation system. Neurocomputing, 72(13–15), 3220–3230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengkun, L., Xiao, Z., & Wensen, C. (2009). PID control to Maglev train system. In International Conference on Industrial and Information System (pp. 341–343). Haikou.

  • Isidori, A., & Kang, W. (1995). \(\text{ H }_{\infty }\) control via measurement feedback for general nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40(3), 466–472.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, R., & Sira-Ramirez, H. (2010). Trajectory tracking for the magnetic ball levitation system via exact feedforward linearization and GPI control. International Journal of Control, 83(6), 1155–1166.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nataraj, P., & Patil, M. D. (2008). Robust control design for nonlinear magnetic levitation system using quantitative feedback theory (QFT). In Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON) (pp. 365–370). Mumbai.

  • Shieh, H.-J., Siao, J.-H., & Liu, Y.-C. (2010). A robust optimal sliding-mode control approach for magnetic levitation systems. Asian Journal of Control, 12(4), 480–487.

  • Sinha, P. K., & Pechev, A. N. (1999). Model reference adaptive control of a Maglev system with stable maximum descent criterion. Automatica, 35(8), 1457–1465.

  • Sinha, P. K., & Pechev, A. N. (2004). Nonlinear \(\text{ H }_{\infty }\) controllers for electromagnetic suspension systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(4), 563–568.

  • Tian, F., & Nagurka, M. (2012). Robust control design of a single degree-of-freedom magnetic levitation system by quantitative feedback theory. In Proceedings of the ASME/ISCIE 2012 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (pp. 109–115). St. Louis, MO.

  • Willems, J. C. (1972). Dissipative dynamical systems-part I: General theory. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 45(5), 35–321.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Javadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javadi, A., Alizadeh, G., Ghiasi, A.R. et al. Robust Control of Electromagnetic Levitation System. J Control Autom Electr Syst 25, 527–536 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-014-0140-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-014-0140-8

Keywords

Navigation