Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benefits and Limitations of Block Periodized Training Approaches to Athletes’ Preparation: A Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present review introduces innovative concepts of training periodization and summarizes a large body of findings characterizing their potential benefits and possible limitations. Evidence-based analysis of the traditional periodization model led to elaboration of alternative versions of athletic preparation. These alternative versions postulated the superiority of training programs with a high concentration of selected workloads compared with traditionally designed plans directed at the concurrent development of many athletic abilities at low/medium workload concentration. The training cycles of highly concentrated specialized workloads were coined “training blocks” by experts and practitioners; correspondingly, the alternative versions were termed “block periodized (BP) preparation systems” by their presenters. Ultimately, two BP training models were proposed: a concentrated unidirectional training model (CU) and a multi-targeted BP approach to athletes’ preparation. The first innovative version postulated administration of highly concentrated training means for enhancement of one leading fitness component, whereas the second version proposed the development of many targeted abilities within sequenced block mesocycles containing a minimal number of compatible training modalities. Both versions differ in their methodological background, duration and content of training blocks, possibilities of providing multi-peak performances, and applicability to various sports. In recent decades, many studies have evaluated the effects of both BP training versions in different sports. Examination of the training effects producing by the CU model in combat and team sports has found significant gains in various fitness estimates but not in sport-specific performances. Similarly, utilization of a CU program by elite swimmers did not lead to substantial enhancement of their peak performances. In contrast, studies of multi-targeted BP training programs have revealed their distinct superiority compared with traditional preparation in endurance, team, and dual sports, and strength/power training and recreational athletes (28 studies). It is suggested that the CU training strategy suits athletic disciplines demanding one fitness component like explosive strength in jumping performances. Unlike this limitation, the multi-targeted BP system prompted a beneficial increase of specific preparedness in sports and disciplines in which peak performances require the application of many targeted athletic abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kotov BA. Olympic sport. Guidelines for track and field. Sankt Petersburg: Majtov Publisher; 1916 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matveyev LP. Problem of periodization the sport training. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1964 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Issurin V, Kaverin V. Planning and design of annual preparation cycle in canoe-kayak paddling. In: Samsonov EB, Kaverin VF, editors. Grebnoj sport (rowing, canoeing, kayaking). Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1985. pp. 25–29 (In Russian).

  4. Verkhoshansky YV. Programming and organization of training process. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1985 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Verkhoshansky YV. Bases of special physical preparation of athletes. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1988 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bondarchuk AP. Training of track and field athletes. Kiev: Health Publisher (Zdorovie); 1986 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pyne DB, Touretski G. An analysis of the training of Olympic sprint champion Alexandre Popov. Aust Swim Coach. 1993;10(5):5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Touretski G. Preparation of sprint events: ASCTA Convention. Canberra: Australian Institute of Sport; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Verkhoshansky YV. Long-term delayed training effect of strength workloads. Moscow Theory Pract Phys Cult. 1983;5:5–8 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Verkhoshansky YV. Special strength training. A practical manual for coaches. Muskegon: Ultimate Athlete Concepts; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zatsiorsky VM. Science and practice of strength training. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Verkhoshansky YV, Siff M. Supertraining. 7th ed. Muskegon: Ultimate Athlete Concepts; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Villani R, Gesuale D. Comparative analysis of the systems of classic and block periodization in the shoot boxing. Salzburg: 8th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science; 2003. p. 233.

  14. Moreira A, Olivera PR, Okano AH, et al. Dynamics of power measures alterations and the posterior long-lasting training effect on basketball players submitted to the block training system. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2004;10(4):251–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Souza J, Gomes AC, Leme L, et al. Changes in metabolic and motor performance variables induced by training in handball players. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2006;12(3):118–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campeiz JM, de Oliveira PR. Effects of concentrated charges of strength training on anaerobic variables and body composition of professional soccer players. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;(Suppl 10):172.

  17. Da Silva Marinho P. Block periodization systems: main training effects on the performance of high level swimmers. PhD Thesis. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2008.

  18. Issurin V, Lustig G. Klassification, Dauer und praktische Komponenten der Resteffekte von Training. Leistungsport. 2004;34(3):55–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Viru A. Adaptation in sports training. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Counsilman BE, Counsilman J. The residual effects of training. J Swim Res. 1991;7:5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Issurin V. Block periodization versus traditional training theory: a review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2008;48(1):65–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernard C. Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris: 1865.

  23. Cannon W. Organization of physiological homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 1929;9:399–431.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Selye H. The physiology and pathology of exposure to stress. Montreal: ACTA Inc., Medical Publishers; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Issurin V. Generalized training effects induced by athleic preparation. A review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009;49:333–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Issurin V. New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Med. 2010;40(3):189–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Issurin V, Sharobajko I, Timofeyev V, et al. Particularities of annual preparation of top-level canoe-kayak paddlers during 1984–1988 Olympic cycle. Scientific report. Leningrad Research Institute for Physical Culture, 1988 (In Russian).

  28. Garcia-Pallares J, Garcia-Fernandez M, Sanchez-Medina L, et al. Performance changes in world-class kayakers following two different training periodization models. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110:99–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Breil FA, Weber SN, Koller S, et al. Block training periodization in alpine skiing: effect of 11-day HIT on VO2max and performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:1077–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rønnestad BR, Hansen J, Ellefsen S. Block periodization of high-intensity aerobic intervals provides superior training effects in trained cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;24:34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Støren O, Sanda SB, Haave M, et al. Improved VO2max and time trial performance with more high aerobic intensity interval training and reduced training volume: a case study on an elite national cyclist. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;26(10):2705–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bakken TA. Effects of block periodization training versus traditional periodization training in trained cross country skiers. Master Thesis; Liliehammer University College, 2013.

  33. Alecu A. Importance of using periodization in blocks in quality development in kayak biomotrice. Marathon 2013;V(2):127–33.

  34. Rønnestad BR, Ellefsen S, Nygaard H, et al. Effects of 12 weeks of block periodization on performance and performance indices in well-trained cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(2):327–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Klementiev I. Training program of long standing technical improvement for achievement and maintenance of outstanding sportsmanship. PhD dissertation. Riga: Latvian Sport Pedagogical Academy; 1993 (In Russian, Abstract in English).

  36. Shantarovich VV, Narskin AG, Shantarovich AV. Block training system within Olympic preparation cycle of top-level canoe-kayak paddlers. In: Bondar AI, editor. Actual problems of high-performance sport towards the XXIX Beijing Olympic Games. Minsk: Research Sport Institute of Belarus; 2006. pp. 113–7 (In Russian).

  37. Radovanovic D, Rakovic A, Ignatovic A, et al. Influence of block periodization on adaptation in well-trained race walkers. J Sport Sci Med (Suppl.). 2009;2009(11):136.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stolen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, et al. Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med. 2005;35:501–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Porta J, Sanz D. Periodization in top level men’s tennis. ITF. Coach Sport Sci Rev. 2005;36:12–3.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mallo J. Effect of block periodization on performance in competition in a soccer team during four consecutive seasons: a case study. Intern J Perform Analysis Sport. 2011;11(3):476–85.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mallo J. Effect of block periodization on physical fitness during a competitive soccer season. Intern J Perform Anal Sport. 2012;12(1):64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wahl P, Güldner M, Mester J. Effects and sustainability of a 13-day high-intensity shock microcycle in soccer. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13:259–65.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chadd N. An approach to the periodization of training during the in-season for team sports. UKSCA. 2010;18:5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Iovanovic M. Physical preparation for soccer. Belgrade: Special edition; 2011.

  45. Herrick A, Stone W. The effects of periodization versus progressive resistance exercise on upper and lower body strength in women. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;10(2):72–6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hartmann H, Bob A, Wirth K, et al. Effects of different periodization models on rate of force development and power ability of the upper extremity. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(7):1921–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Painter K, Haff G, Ramsey M, et al. Strength gains: block vs. daily undulating periodization weight training among track and field athletes. Intern J Sports Phys Performance. 2012;7(2):161–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bartolomei S, Hoffman JR, Merni F, et al. A comparison of traditional and block periodized strength training programs in trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(4):990–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Poliquin C. Five steps to increasing the effectiveness of your strength training program. NSCA J. 1988;10(3):34–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Naspinsky G. EFS classic: a practical guide for implementation block periodization for powerlifting. Articles elitefts.com., 2010.

  51. Smith J. The perfect program: block periodization for the masses: 12 weeks to monumental gains in mass and strength. Joe Weider’s Muscle Fitness. 2011;72(7):82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sikorski W. New approach to preparation of elite judo athletes to main competition. J Combat Sports Martial Arts. 2011;2(1):57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. National Osteoporosis Foundation. America’s bone health: the state of osteoporosis and low bone mass in our nation. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vanni A, Meyer F, da Veiga A, et al. Comparison of the effects of two resistance training regimes on muscular and bone responses in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2010;21(9):1537–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kemmler W, Bebenek M, von Stengel S, et al. Effect of block-periodized exercise training on bone and coronary heart disease risk factors in early post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;23(1):121–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Vorobiov AN. Weightlifting. Essays of physiology and athletic training. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1977 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tschiene P. Die Prioritat des biologischen Aspects in der “Theorie des Trainings”. Leistungssport. 1991;6:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zanon S. Die alte “Theorie des Trainings” in der Kritik. Leistungssport. 1997;3:18–9.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bondarchuk AP. Transfer of training in sports. Muskegon: Ultimate Training Concepts; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Issurin V. Block periodization: breakthrough in sport training. Muskegon: Ultimate Training Concepts; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Mr. Mike Garmise for editing the English text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Elite Sport Department, Wingate Institute, 42902, Netanya, Israel

    Vladimir B. Issurin

Authors
  1. Vladimir B. Issurin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir B. Issurin.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was used to assist in the preparation of this review.

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Issurin, V.B. Benefits and Limitations of Block Periodized Training Approaches to Athletes’ Preparation: A Review. Sports Med 46, 329–338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0425-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0425-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation