Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of Jumping Exercise in Improving Bone Mineral Density Among Premenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Jumping exercise is frequently regarded as an optimum strategy for increasing pubertal bone growth, but its role in promoting or preserving adult bone mineral density (BMD) is still undefined.

Objectives

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence for the influence of jumping exercise on BMD in premenopausal women and to define the effectiveness of high-impact exercise in improving or maintaining female bone health.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Google Scholar and BIOSIS up to 1 September 2013 for jumping exercise influence on BMD in premenopausal women. The search terms used were ‘jumping’, ‘skipping’, ‘brief exercise’, ‘high impact’, ‘bone density’, ‘BMD’, ‘femoral neck’, ‘lumbar spine’, and ‘trochanter’, and the search was limited to females. Six papers met the search criteria.

Results

Six studies on BMD in the femoral neck (Q = 2.63, p = 0.854, I 2 = 0.0 %), trochanter (Q = 2.10, p = 0.10, I 2 = 0.0 %) and lumbar spine (Q = 1.17, p = 0.979, I 2 = 0.0 %) were highly homogenous in determining skeletal responses to jumping exercise. Jumping exercise significantly increased BMD in the femoral neck {weighted mean difference (WMD) [fixed effect] = 0.017 g/cm2, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.014–0.20, p < 0.001} and trochanter (WMD [fixed effect] = 0.021, 95 % CI 0.018–0.024, p < 0.001). However, the lumbar spine seemed to benefit less from such high-impact exercise (p = 0.181). Visual inspection of the plots implicated some degree of asymmetry, indicating a slightly positive treatment effect at the femoral neck and trochanter sites.

Conclusions

Based on meta-analysis of existing studies, the sensitivity of skeletal response to jumping exercise in premenopausal women is significant and site-specific, with significant benefit from high-impact exercise noted, especially at the hip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994.

  2. National Osteoporosis Foundation. America’s bone health: the state of osteoporosis and low bone mass in our nation. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao D, Wu H, Liu Z. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. In: Liu Z, editor. Bone mineral and clinic practise. Beijing: Science and Technology Press; 2006. p. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17(5 Suppl):505S–11S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vondracek SF, Hansen LB, McDermott MT. Osteoporosis risk in premenopausal women. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29(3):305–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohrt WM, Bloomfield SA, Little KD, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: physical activity and bone health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(11):1985–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace BA, Cumming RG. Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2000;67(1):10–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolff I, van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HC, et al. The effect of exercise training programs on bone mass: a meta-analysis of published controlled trials in pre- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chilibeck PD, Sale DG, Webber CE. Exercise and bone mineral density. Sports Med. 1995;19(2):103–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Forwood MR, Larsen JA. Exercise recommendations for osteoporosis. A position statement of the Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society. Aust Fam Physician. 2000;29(8):761–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ. Increase in femoral bone density in young women following high-impact exercise. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4(2):72–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassey EJ, Rothwell MC, Littlewood JJ, et al. Pre- and postmenopausal women have different bone mineral density responses to the same high-impact exercise. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(12):1805–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kato T, Terashima T, Yamashita T, et al. Effect of low-repetition jump training on bone mineral density in young women. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100(3):839–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niu K, Ahola R, Guo H, et al. Effect of office-based brief high-impact exercise on bone mineral density in healthy premenopausal women: the Sendai Bone Health Concept Study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(5):568–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vainionpää A, Korpelainen R, Leppaluoto J, et al. Effects of high-impact exercise on bone mineral density: a randomized controlled trial in premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(2):191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winters-Stone KM, Snow CM. Site-specific response of bone to exercise in premenopausal women. Bone. 2006;39(6):1203–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bailey CA, Brooke-Wavell K. Optimum frequency of exercise for bone health: randomised controlled trial of a high-impact unilateral intervention. Bone. 2010;46(4):1043–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al. Randomised controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on selected risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 1996;348(9038):1343–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugiyama T, Yamaguchi A, Kawai S. Effects of skeletal loading on bone mass and compensation mechanism in bone: a new insight into the “mechanostat” theory. J Bone Miner Metab. 2002;20(4):196–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Manolagas SC. Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(2):115–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parfitt AM. Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem. 1994;55(3):273–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet. 1993;341(8837):72–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Coventry E, Connor KM, Hart BA, et al. The effect of lower extremity fatigue on shock attenuation during single-leg landing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(10):1090–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vainionpää A, Korpelainen R, Sievanen H, et al. Effect of impact exercise and its intensity on bone geometry at weight-bearing tibia and femur. Bone. 2007;40(3):604–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. Effects of different impact exercise modalities on bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(3):251–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nikander R, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, et al. Targeted exercise against osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for optimising bone strength throughout life. BMC Med. 2010;8:47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahlborg HG, Johnell O, Turner CH, et al. Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(4):327–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Blair SN, Kohl HW, Gordon NF, et al. How much physical activity is good for health? Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:99–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Winters KM, Snow CM. Detraining reverses positive effects of exercise on the musculoskeletal system in premenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(12):2495–503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kontulainen S, Heinonen A, Kannus P, et al. Former exercisers of an 18-month intervention display residual aBMD benefits compared with control women 3.5 years post-intervention: a follow-up of a randomized controlled high-impact trial. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(3):248–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Friedlander AL, Genant HK, Sadowsky S, et al. A two-year program of aerobics and weight training enhances bone mineral density of young women. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10(4):574–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(3):397–402.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Umemura Y, Ishiko T, Yamauchi T, et al. Five jumps per day increase bone mass and breaking force in rats. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(9):1480–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH. Partitioning a daily mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts improves the osteogenic response to loading. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(8):1596–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Srinivasan S, Weimer DA, Agans SC, et al. Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(9):1613–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Donahue SW, Donahue HJ, Jacobs CR. Osteoblastic cells have refractory periods for fluid-flow-induced intracellular calcium oscillations for short bouts of flow and display multiple low-magnitude oscillations during long-term flow. J Biomech. 2003;36(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Donahue SW, Jacobs CR, Donahue HJ. Flow-induced calcium oscillations in rat osteoblasts are age, loading frequency, and shear stress dependent. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281(5):C1635–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lanyon LE. Functional strain in bone tissue as an objective, and controlling stimulus for adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomech. 1987;20(11–12):1083–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hahn S, Williamson PR, Hutton JL, et al. Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies. Stat Med. 2000;19(24):3325–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article was based on work funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under grant numbers Y2110954 and LY14H070001. Renqing Zhao, Meihua Zhao, and Liuji Zhang have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renqing Zhao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Zhao, M. & Zhang, L. Efficiency of Jumping Exercise in Improving Bone Mineral Density Among Premenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 44, 1393–1402 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0220-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0220-8

Keywords

Navigation