Skip to main content
Log in

Quantified Risk Ranking Model for Condition-Based Risk and Reliability Centered Maintenance

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the recent past, risk and reliability centered maintenance (RRCM) framework is introduced with a shift in the methodological focus from reliability and probabilities (expected values) to reliability, uncertainty and risk. In this paper authors explain a novel methodology for risk quantification and ranking the critical items for prioritizing the maintenance actions on the basis of condition-based risk and reliability centered maintenance (CBRRCM). The critical items are identified through criticality analysis of RPN values of items of a system and the maintenance significant precipitating factors (MSPF) of items are evaluated. The criticality of risk is assessed using three risk coefficients. The likelihood risk coefficient treats the probability as a fuzzy number. The abstract risk coefficient deduces risk influenced by uncertainty, sensitivity besides other factors. The third risk coefficient is called hazardous risk coefficient, which is due to anticipated hazards which may occur in the future and the risk is deduced from criteria of consequences on safety, environment, maintenance and economic risks with corresponding cost for consequences. The characteristic values of all the three risk coefficients are obtained with a particular test. With few more tests on the system, the values may change significantly within controlling range of each coefficient, hence ‘random number simulation’ is resorted to obtain one distinctive value for each coefficient. The risk coefficients are statistically added to obtain final risk coefficient of each critical item and then the final rankings of critical items are estimated. The prioritization in ranking of critical items using the developed mathematical model for risk assessment shall be useful in optimization of financial losses and timing of maintenance actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.K. Lad, M.S. Kulkarni, Optimal maintenance schedule decisions for machine tools considering the user’s cost structure. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(2), 5859–5871 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B.K. Lad, M.S. Kulkarni, Integrated reliability and optimal maintenance schedule design: a life cycle cast based approach. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 3(1), 78–90 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Rausand, Reliability centered maintenance. J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 60, 121–132 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Qingbin, W. Qingfeng, G. Jinji, The research on risk and cbm decision making and task optimizing system. Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 10(4), 1250017–1250037 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Eisinger, U.K. Rakowsky, Modelingof uncertainties in reliability centered maintenance—a probabilistic approach. J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71, 159–164 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B.S. Hauge, D.C. Johnston, Reliability centered maintenance and risk assessment, in Proceedings of IEEE Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, (2001)

  7. M. Pexa, T. Hladik, V. Legat, M. Muller, P. Valasek, Reliability and risk treatment centered maintenance, in IEEE International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance and Safety Engineering, (2013)

  8. J.T. Selvik, T. Aven, A framework for reliability and risk centered maintenance. J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96, 324–333 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Aven, On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 623–631 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D.J. Fonseca, G.M. Knapp, An expert system for reliability centered maintenance in the chemical industry. Exp. Syst. Appl. 19, 45–57 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B.U. Sonawane, B. Rajiv, P.K. Chattopadhyaya, Critical and hazard analysis of various components in a system using risk priority number and analytical hierarchy process. J. Inst. Eng. (India) Prod. Div. 90, 18–23 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.K. Biswas, M.C. Majumdar, S.K. Basu, Risk and hazard analysis of machines through reliability based conditioning monitoring, in Proceeding of the 4th Int.& 25th AIMTDE Conference, Kolkata (2012)

  13. M. Singh, M.D. Jaybhaye, S.K. Basu, Risk quantification and evaluation modelling. Def. Sci. J. 64, 378–384 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Samson, J.A. Rencke, M.M. Wiecek, A review of different perspectives on uncertainty and risk, and an alternative modeling paradigm. J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94, 558–567 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S.K. Basu, D.K. Pal, H. Bagchi, Operations Research for Engineers (Oxford & IBH, India, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Minitab Statistical Software. version 17, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradip Kumar Chattopadhyaya.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chattopadhyaya, P.K., Basu, S.K. & Majumdar, M.C. Quantified Risk Ranking Model for Condition-Based Risk and Reliability Centered Maintenance. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 98, 325–333 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0226-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0226-0

Keywords

Navigation