Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Soil Erosion and Identification of Critical Areas for Soil Conservation Measures using RS and GIS-based Universal Soil Loss Equation

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Present study aimed at estimating soil erosion potential and identification of critical areas for soil conservation measures in an ungauged catchment situated in Aravalli hills of Udaipur district, Rajasthan (India). Also, impact of rainfall on soil erosion is evaluated. The soil erosion is estimated for 10 year period (2001–2010) by Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) model using Geographical information system (GIS) and remote sensing techniques for every 12 m × 12 m area. Thematic maps of six USLE model parameters, i.e., rainfall erosivity (R-factor), soil erodibility (K-factor), slope length (L-factor), slope steepness (S-factor), crop and management (C-factor), and support practice (P-factor), were prepared in GIS platform. The R-factor ranged from 1,522.93 to 10,225.88 MJ mm ha−1  h−1 year−1 in the years 2006 and 2008, respectively, when the annual rainfall was 984.3 and 572.2 mm, and number of rainy days were 58 and 47, respectively. The K-factor was highest for fine loam soil covering 56 % area, while the lowest value was for coarse loamy sand in 22 % area. The lowest value of the L-factor (0.736) was in accordance with the high slopes nearby catchment boundary; whereas the highest value (0.832) was for almost zero slopes in 34 % area nearby waterbodies. Opposite to the L-factor, the S-factor values were high (>4) for the higher slopes nearby catchment boundary and the lowest values for the zero slopes. The C-factor value in 170.36 km2 or 48.91 % of the area is 0.1 while the value is zero for waterbodies and builtup lands. The P-factor value in 250.36 km2 or 71.87 % of the area is 0.8. The mean annual soil erosion in the major portion of the catchment (231.13 km2 or 66.38 %) exceeds 10 t ha−1 year−1 indicating high to very severe soil erosion conditions prevailing in the catchment. It is apparent that vast quantities of the soil are getting eroded from the catchment, and the annual rainfall amount and rainfall intensity have the profound effect on the soil erosion potential. This study emphasizes that USLE model coupled with GIS and remote sensing techniques are promising and cost-effective tools for mapping critical areas of soil erosion in ungauged catchments especially in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1980) ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE 23(3):938–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brady NC, Weil RR (1999) The nature and properties of soils. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River 881 pp

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cowen J (1993) A proposed method for calculating the LS for use with the USLE in a grid-based environment. Proceedings of the 13th Annual ESRI User Conference Palm Springs, vol 1. California, pp 65–74

  4. Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of north eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 22:1783–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Desmet PJ, Govers G (1996) A GIS procedure for automatically calculating the USLE LS on topographically complex landscape units. J Soil Water Conserv 51:427–433

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferro V (1997) Further remarks on a distributed approach to sediment delivery. Hydrol Sci J 42(5):633–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferro V, Minacapilli M (1995) Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrol Sci J 40(6):703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferro V, Porto P, Tusa G (1998) Testing a distributed approach for modeling sediment delivery. Hydrol Sci J 43(3):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadley RF, Lai R, Onstad CA, DE Walling, Yair A (1985) Recent developments in erosion and sediment yield studies. UNESCO (IHP) Publication, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hickey R, Smith A, Jankowski P (1994) Slope length calculations from a DEM within Arc/Info Grid. Comput Environ Urban Syst 18:365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ILWIS (2001) Integrated Land and Water Information System, 3.2 Academic, User’s Guide. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), The Netherlands, pp 428–456

  12. Jain BL, Singh RS, Shyampura RL, Gajbhiye KS (2005). Land use planning of Udaipur District—soil resource and agro-ecological assessment., Publication No. 113, National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (NBSS&LUP), Nagpur, 69 p

  13. Jain MK, Das D (2010) Estimation of sediment yield and areas of soil erosion and deposition for watershed prioritization using GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 24:2091–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain MK, Kothyari UC, Rangaraju KG (2005) Geographic information system based distributed model for soil erosion and rate of sediment outflow from catchments. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 131(7):755–769

  15. Jain SK, Kumar S, Varghese J (2001) Estimation of soil erosion for a Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resour Manag 15:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkby MJ, Morgan RPC (1980) Soil erosion. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kothyari UC (1996) Erosion and sedimentation problems in India. Proceedings of international symposium on erosion and sediment yield: global and regional perspectives, Exeter, U.K., IAHS Publication No. vol 236, pp 531–539

  18. Kothyari UC, Jain SK (1997) Sediment yield estimation using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 42(6):833–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kothyari UC, Jain MK, Raju KGR (2002) Estimation of temporal variation of sediment yield using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 47(5):693–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Machiwal D, Mishra A, Jha MK, Sharma A, Sisodia SS (2012) Modeling short-term spatial and temporal variability of groundwater level using geostatistics and GIS. Nat Resour Res 21(1):117–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Machiwal D, Nimawat JV, Samar KK (2011) Evaluating efficacy of groundwater level monitoring network by graphical and multivariate statistical techniques. J Agric Eng ISAE 48(3):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Machiwal D, Rangi N, Sharma A (2015) Integrated knowledge- and data-driven approaches for groundwater potential zoning using GIS and multi-criteria decision making techniques on hard-rock terrain of Ahar catchment, Rajasthan, India. Environ Earth Sci 73:1871–1892

  23. Machiwal D, Srivastava SK, Jain S (2010) Estimation of sediment yield and selection of suitable sites for soil conservation measures in Ahar river basin of Udaipur, Rajasthan using RS and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(4):696–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McConell K (1983) An economic model of soil conservation. Am J Agric Econ 65:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCool DK, Brown LC, Foster GR, Mutchler CK, Meyer LD (1987) Revised slope steepness factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Trans ASAE 30:1387–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mellerowicz KT, Rees HW, Chow TL, Ghanem I (1994) Soil conservation planning at the watershed level using the Universal Soil Loss Equation with GIS and microcomputer technologies: a case study. J Soil Water Conserv 49:194–200

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mishra PK, Deng ZQ (2009) Sediment TMDL development for the Amite river. Water Resour Manag 23(4):839–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mishra SK, Singh VP, Sansaleve JJ (2003) A modified SCS-CN method: characterization and testing. Water Resour Manag 17:37–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Monchareon L (1982) Application of soil maps and report for soil and water conservation. Department of Land Development, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moore I, Wilson P (1992) Length-slope factors for the revised universal soil loss equation: simplified method of estimation. J Soil Water Conserv 47(5):423–428

    Google Scholar 

  31. Narayan VVD, Babu R (1983) Estimation of soil erosion in India. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 109(4):419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Novotny V, Olem H (1994) Water quality presentation, identification, and management of diffuse pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oldeman LR (1992) Global extent of soil degradation. ISRIC Bi-Annual Report 1991–1992, International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC), Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp 19–36

  34. Ozsoy G, Aksoy E, Dirim MS, Tumsavas Z (2012) Determination of soil erosion risk in the Mustafakemalpasa River basin, Turkey, using the revised universal soil loss equation, geographic information system, and remote sensing. Environ Manage 50(4):679–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 21(4):729–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pimental DC, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K, Kurz D, McNair M, Crist S, Shpritz L, Fitton L, Saffouri R, Blair R (1995) Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267(5201):1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pradhan B, Chaudhari A, Adinarayana J, Buchroithner MF (2012) Soil erosion assessment and its correlation with landslide events using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Monit Assess 184(2):715–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Prasannakumar V, Vijith V, Abinod S, Geeta H (2012) Estimation of soil erosion risk within a small mountainous sub-watershed in Kerala, India, using Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and geo-information technology. Geosci Front 3(2):209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK and Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook Number 703, 404 pp

  40. Schwab GO, Fangmeier D, Elliot WJ, Frevert RK (1993) Soil and water conservation engineering, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Setegn SS, Srinivasan R, Dargahi B, Melesse AM (2010) Spatial delineation of soil erosion vulnerability in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol Process 23(26):3738–3750

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shangle AK (1991) Hydrographie surveys of Indian reservoirs. In: Course Material for Workshop on Reservoir Sedimentation, sponsored by IRTCES, China, and UNESCO (New Delhi, India), pp. 2.9.1–2.9.16

  43. Sharma A, Tiwari KN, Bhadoria PBS (2011) Effect of land use land cover change on soil erosion potential in an agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 173(1–4):789–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Singh G, Babu R, Narain P, Bhushan LS, Abrol IP (1992) Soil erosion rates in India. J Soil Water Conserv 47(1):97–99

    Google Scholar 

  45. USDA SCS (1969). National Engineering Handbook. Section 4, Hydrology, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS), Washington DC

  46. USGS (2004). Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 1 Arc Second scene SRTM_u03_n008e004, Unfilled Unfinished 2.0, Global Land Cover Facility, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, February 2000

  47. Vijith H, Suma M, Rekha VB, Shiju C, Rejith PG (2012) An assessment of soil erosion probability and erosion rate in a tropical mountainous watershed using remote sensing and GIS. Arab J Geosic 5(4):797–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wicks JM, Bathurst JC (1996) SHESED: a physically based, distributed erosion and sediment yield component for the SHE hydrological modelling system. J Hydrol 175:213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wischmeier WH (1959) A rainfall erosion index for a universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1958) Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Trans Am Geophys Union 39(2):285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook Number 537, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, p 57

  52. Wischmeier WH, Johnson CB, Cross BV (1971) A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J Soil Water Conserv 26(5):189–193

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bhuj, 370 105, Gujarat, India

    Deepesh Machiwal

  2. SWE Department, College of Technology and Engineering, MPUAT, Udaipur, 313 001, Rajasthan, India

    Pratibha Katara & H. K. Mittal

Authors
  1. Deepesh Machiwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pratibha Katara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. K. Mittal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepesh Machiwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machiwal, D., Katara, P. & Mittal, H.K. Estimation of Soil Erosion and Identification of Critical Areas for Soil Conservation Measures using RS and GIS-based Universal Soil Loss Equation. Agric Res 4, 183–195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0157-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0157-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation