Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beckenbodenprotektive Geburtshilfe

Wie sich Urogynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin ergänzen können

  • Fortbildung
  • Published:
gynäkologie + geburtshilfe Aims and scope

Der Beckenboden bestimmt in seiner komplexen Funktionalität als zentraler Aspekt Schwangerschaft und Geburt und steht gleichzeitig bei Erkrankungen im Fokus der Urogynäkologie. Somit ist es erforderlich, dass die beiden Subdisziplinen Geburtshilfe und Urogynäkologie die Distanz zueinander verlieren, um vom jeweiligen Anderen lernen zu können. Auf diese Art und Weise kann die Qualität der Versorgung unserer Patientinnen nachhaltig verbessert werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Huebner M. et al. Intrapartal pelvic floor protection: a pragmatic and interdisciplinary approach between obstetrics and urogynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017. 295(4): p. 795–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nygaard I. et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008. 300 (11): p. 1311–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Margulies R.U. et al. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in magnetic resonance images. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. 107(5): p. 1064–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. DeLancey J.O. et al. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 101(1): p. 46–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLancey J.O. et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. 109(2 Pt 1): p. 295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lammers K. et al. Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect. Int Urogynecol J. 2012. 23(12): p. 1653–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan D.M. et al. Vaginal support as determined by levator ani defect status 6 weeks after primary surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011. 114(2): p. 141–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tunn R. Morphologie des Stressharninkontinenz-Kontrollsystems und seine pathomorphologischen Veränderungen bei Stressharninkontinenz. Habilitationsschrift, in Medizinische Fakultät Charité. 2002, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Berlin. p. 81.

  9. Borello-France D. et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. 108(4): p. 863–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oberwalder M., Connor J., and Wexner S.D. Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg. 2003. 90(11): p. 1333–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mous M., Muller S.A., and de Leeuw J.W. Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG 2008. 115(2): p. 234–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenzen-Schulte M. Zangen und andere Hilfsmittel: Eine Geburt ist nichts für grobe Handwerker. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2015. 4.4.2015.

  13. Kearney R. et al. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. 107(1): p. 144–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Macarthur C. et al. Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG 2005. 112(8): p. 1075–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Memon H.U. et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps- assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. 125(5): p. 1080–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Michalec I. et al. Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery does not significantly contribute to the higher incidence of levator ani avulsion]. Ceska Gynekol. 2015. 80(1): p. 37–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anim-Somuah M., Smyth R.M., and Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(12): p. CD000331.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Agrawal D. et al. The effect of epidural analgesia on labour, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in nullipara of India, 2011-2014. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014. 8(10): p. OC03–6.

  19. Low L.K. et al. Predicting Birth-Related Levator Ani Tear Severity in Primiparous Women: Evaluating Maternal Recovery from Labor and Delivery (EMRLD Study). Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. 4(6): p. 266–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jango H. et al. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. 210(1): p. 59 e1-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DeLancey J.O. Episiotomy: what’s the angle? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. 103(1): p. 3–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carroli G. and L. Mignini, Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 (1): p. CD000081.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bader W. and Aigmueller T. Leitlinie zum Management von Dammrissen III. und IV. Grades nach vaginaler Geburt. AWMF 015/079, 2014.

  24. Fodstad K., Staff A.C., and Laine K. Effect of different episiotomy techniques on perineal pain and sexual activity 3 months after delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014. 25(12): p. 1629–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultan A.H. Editorial: obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 1999. 5: p. 193–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baghestan E. et al. Risk of recurrence and subsequent delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. BJOG 2012. 119(1): p. 62–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson D. et al. UR-CHOICE: can we provide mothers-to-be with information about the risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? Int Urogynecol J. 2014. 25(11): p. 1449–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Calwerstr. 7, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland

    Markus Hübner

Authors
  1. Markus Hübner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Hübner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hübner, M. Wie sich Urogynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin ergänzen können. gynäkologie + geburtshilfe 22, 28–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15013-017-1174-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15013-017-1174-3

Search

Navigation