Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Academic I.D. in jeopardy: the erosion of time, professional values, and physician satisfaction

  • Review
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The American public entrusts academic medicine with a varied portfolio of critical responsibilities: the thoughtful mentoring of future generations of doctors, the engagement of cutting edge discoveries, and the empathic treatment of patients with complicated illnesses. The erosion of time to perform these duties has led to an estrangement of our key professional values and thus a loss of public trust, the inability to recognize new diseases, reduced communication in our ranks, and physician dissatisfaction. Much of this is driven by an unbalanced focus on the business model of medicine, highlighting rapid patient transactions linked to professional income with financial incentives for high-volume care. Reversing the current trends requires a new type of leadership committed to long-held professional values and a recognition of what drives professional excellence. As internists and infectious diseases specialists without procedures in our practice, we are especially vulnerable to these trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brill S. Bitter Pill: how outrageous pricing and egregious profits are destroying our health care. Time Mag Spec Rep. 2013; 16–55.

  2. Joynt KE, Le BA, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Compensation of chief executives officers at non profit US hospitals. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brill S. Bungling the easy stuff. Hospitals are still overcharging the poor. Obamacare was supposed to fix that too. What went wrong? Time Mag. 2013; 18–19.

  4. Wenzel RP, Hayden FG, Groschel DHM, et al. Acute febrile cerebrovasculitis: a syndrome of unknown, perhaps rickettsial cause. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:606–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Satcher D. Emerging infections: getting ahead of the curve. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1:1–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fauci AS, Touchette NA, Folkers GK. Emerging infectious diseases: a 10-year perspective from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:519–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Recovering Holder L, Loyalty Physicians. Lessons from a national physician survey on crafting a true hospital-physician partnership. Health Exec. 2003;18:65–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shanafelt TD, West CP, Sloan JA, et al. Career fit and burnout among academic faculty. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:990–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edmond MB. Taylorized medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:845–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verghese A. Culture shock—patient as icon, icon as patient. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2748–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook DA, Sorensen KJ, Wilkinson JM. Value and process of curbside consultations in clinical practice: a grounded theory study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:602–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pirsig RM. Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. An inquiry into values. New York: William Morrow & Co.; 1074.

  13. Pohl H, Robertson D, Welch G. Repeated upper endoscopy in the medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell JM. Urologists’ use of intensity—modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1629–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pink DH. Drive. The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christmas C, Kravet SJ, Durso SC, Wright SM. Clinical excellence in academia: perspectives from masterful academic clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:989–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Agan T. Why innovators get better with age. NY times. Business. 2013; 8.

  18. Taleb NT. Antifragile: things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House, Inc.; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Byyny RL. Leadership for the future. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2012;76:2–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Deirdra McAfee and Kay Vose for carefully reviewing the manuscript and offering critical advice. It is a pleasure to contribute to the Festschrift in Gerd Fätkenheuers honor, and the manuscript is an American perspective for his comments. Having spent time with Gerd on the clinical wards and in personal conversations, I am honored to have his friendship. He has high standards, a broad view of Medicine and of life itself, and he is committed to excellence in all the academic missions of teaching, service and research. No formal funding supported this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard P. Wenzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wenzel, R.P., Edmond, M.B. Academic I.D. in jeopardy: the erosion of time, professional values, and physician satisfaction. Infection 43, 141–144 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0744-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0744-3

Keywords

Navigation