Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Release and toxicity comparison between industrial- and sunscreen-derived nano-ZnO particles

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many consumer products containing ZnO have raised concern for safety in regard to environmental impact and the public health. Widely used sunscreens for protecting against UV and avoiding sunburns represent a great exposure to nano-ZnO, one of the ingredients commonly applied in sunscreens. Applying nanoproducts on beaches may release nanoparticles unintentionally into the ocean. Despite the accumulation of such nanoproducts in the ocean harming or being detrimental to critical marine organisms, few studies have investigated the release and potential toxicity of nanoparticles extracted from products and compared them with those from industrial-type nanoparticles. Results show that the cytotoxicity of both industrial- and sunscreen-derived nano-ZnO to the marine diatom algae, Thalassiosira pseudonana, increased as exposure increases over time, as measured by growth inhibition (%) of the algae at a constant concentration of nano-ZnO (10 mg/L). The extent of toxicity appeared to be higher from industrial-type nano-ZnO compared with sunscreen-extracted nano-ZnO, though the extent becomes similar when concentrations increase to 50 mg/L. On the other hand, at a fixed exposure time of 48 h, the cytotoxicity increases as concentrations increase with the higher toxicity shown from the industrial-type compared with sunscreen-induced nano-ZnO. Results indicate that while industrial-type nano-ZnO shows higher toxicity than sunscreen-derived nano-ZnO, the release and extent of toxicity from nano-ZnO extracted from sunscreen are not trivial and should be monitored for the development of safe manufacturing of nanomaterials-induced products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Abbott Chalew TE, Ajmani GS, Huang H, Schwab KJ (2013) Evaluating nanoparticle breakthrough during drinking water treatment. Environ Health Perspect 121(10):1161–1166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker PJ, Branch A (2008) The interaction of modern sunscreen formulations with surface coatings. Prog Org Coat 62(3):313–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brand LE (1984) The salinity tolerance of forty-six marine phytoplankton isolates. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 18(5):543–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buzea C, Pacheco Blandino II, Robbie K (2007) Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2(4):MR17–MR172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G, Golimowski J, Urban PL (2009) Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manag 29(9):2587–2595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao P, Cai X, Lu W, Zhou F, Huo J (2011) Growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis in SHG-44 glioma Cells by Chinese medicine formula “Pingliu Keli”. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2011:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis AK, Hildebrand M, Palenik B (2006) Gene expression induced by copper stress in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Eukaryot Cell 5(7):1157–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin NM, Rogers NJ, Apte SC, Batley GE, Gadd GE, Casey PS (2007) Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate ZnO, bulk ZnO and ZnCl2 to a freshwater microalga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata): the importance of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 41(24):8484–8490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebel T, Foth H, Damm G, Freberger A, Kramer PJ, Lilieenblum W, Röhl C, Schupp T, Weiss C, Wollin KM, Hengstler JG (2014) Manufactured nanomaterials: categorization and approaches to hazard assessment. Arch Toxicol 88(22):2191–2211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk F, Sun TY, Nowack B (2013) Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. Environ Pollut 181:287–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillard RRL (1975) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH (eds) Cult Mar Invertebr Anim. Plenum Press, New York, p 26–60

  • Guillard RRL, Ryther JH (1962) Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. cyclotella nana hustedt, and detonula confervacea (cleve) gran. Can J Microbiol 8(2):229–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasle GR, Heimdal BR (1970) Some species of the centric diatom genus Thalassiosira studies in the light and electron microscopes. Nov Hedwigia Beihefte 31:559–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju-Nam Y, Lead JR (2008) Manufactured nanoparticles: an overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications. Sci Total Environ 400(1–3):396–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurlanda-Witek H, Ngwenya BT, Butler IB (2014) Transport of bare and capped zinc oxide nanoparticles is dependent on porous medium composition. J Contam Hydrol 162–163:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J (2007) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of nanomaterial in aquatic species. J US SJWP 2:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo S, Miglietta ML, Rametta G, Buono S, Di Francia G (2013) Toxic effects of ZnO nanoparticles towards marine algae Dunaliella tertiolecta. Sci Total Environ 445–446:371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer-Jones MA, Gunsolus IL, Murphy CJ, Haynes CL (2013) Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Anal Chem 85(6):3036–3049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mironava T, Hadjiargyrou M, Jurukovski V, Rafallovich MH (2010) Gold nanoparticles cellular toxicity and recovery: effect of size, concentration and exposure time. Nanotoxicology 4(1):120–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150(1):5–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi JT, Tratnyek PG, Sarathy V, Baer DR, Amonette JE, Pecher K, Wang C, Linehan JC, Matson DW, Penn RL, Driessen MD (2005) Characterization and properties of metallic iron nanoparticles: spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and kinetics. Environ Sci Technol 39(5):1221–1230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osmond MJ, McCall MJ (2010) Zinc oxide nanoparticles in modern sunscreens: an analysis of potential exposure and hazard. Nanotoxicology 4(1):15–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Palma S, Fisher NS, Wong SS (2011) Effect of morphology of ZnO nanostructures on their toxicity to marine algae. Aquat Toxicol 102(3–4):186–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B (2012) Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanopart Res 14:1109–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana S, Kalaichelvan PT (2013) Ecotoxicity of nanoparticles. ISRN Toxicol. doi:10.1155/2013/574648

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino C, Ward ML, Neale PJ (2008) Acclimation to elevated carbon dioxide and ultraviolet radiation in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: effects on growth, photosynthesis, and spectral sensitivity of photoinhibition. Limnol Oceanogr 53(2):494–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suman TY, Radhika Rajasree SR, Kirubagaran R (2015) Evaluation of zinc oxide nanoparticles toxicity on marine algae chlorella vulgaris through flow cytometric, cytotoxicity and oxidative stress analysis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toolabi A, Khanjani N (2013) Evaluating the toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the dominant bacteria in the sludge of wastewater treatment facilities. Adv Environ Biol 7:812

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, Hristovski K, von Goetz N (2012) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ Sci Technol 46(4):2242–2250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong SW, Leung PT, Djurisić AB, Leung KM (2010) Toxicities of nano zinc oxide to five marine organisms: influences of aggregate size and ion solubility. Anal Bioanal Chem 396(2):609–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yung MM, Wong SW, Kwok KW, Liu FZ, Leung YH, Chan WT, Li XY, Djurisic AB, Leung KM (2015) Salinity-dependent toxicities of zinc oxide nanoparticles to the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Aquat Toxicol 165:31–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research did not receive a specific grant from any funding agency. We would like to thank Dr. Pat Blackwelder for her assistance with the SEM images.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Joo.

Additional information

E. Spisni, S. Seo, S. H. Joo, and C. Su contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spisni, E., Seo, S., Joo, S.H. et al. Release and toxicity comparison between industrial- and sunscreen-derived nano-ZnO particles. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 2485–2494 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1077-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1077-1

Keywords

Navigation