Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Behaviour and fate of metals in urban wastewater treatment plants: a review

  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concerns on metals in urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are mainly related to its contents in discharges to environment, namely in the final effluent and in the sludge produced. In the near future, more restrictive limits will be imposed to final effluents, due to the recent guidelines of the European Water Framework Directive (EUWFD). Concerning the sludge, at least seven metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) have been regulated in different countries, four of which were classified by EUWFD as priority substances and two of which were also classified as hazardous substances. Although WWTPs are not designed to remove metals, the study of metals behaviour in these systems is a crucial issue to develop predictive models that can help more effectively the regulation of pre-treatment requirements and contribute to optimize the systems to get more acceptable metal concentrations in its discharges. Relevant data have been published in the literature in recent decades concerning the occurrence/fate/behaviour of metals in WWTPs. However, the information is dispersed and not standardized in terms of parameters for comparing results. This work provides a critical review on this issue through a careful systematization, in tables and graphs, of the results reported in the literature, which allows its comparison and so its analysis, in order to conclude about the state of the art in this field. A summary of the main consensus, divergences and constraints found, as well as some recommendations, is presented as conclusions, aiming to contribute to a more concerted action of future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison JD, Allison TL (2005) Partition coefficients for metals in surface water, soil and waste. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez EA, Mochón MC, Sánchez JC, Rodrigéz MT (2002) Heavy metal extractable forms in sludge from wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 47:765–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayari F, Hamdi H, Jedidi N, Gharbi N, Kossai R (2010) Heavy metal distribution in soil and plant in municipal solid waste compost amended plots. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(3):465–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babel S, Dacera D (2006) Heavy metal removal from contaminated sludge for land application: a review. Waste Manag 26:988–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM, Adrian DD (1999) A review of potencially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 11:2469–2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergbäck B, Johansson K, Mohlander U (2001) Urban metal flows—a case study of Stockholm. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 1:3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthold G, Krauth K (1998) Replacement of secondary clarification by membrane separation—results with plate and hollow fibre modules. Water Sci Technol 38(4–5):383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzier R, Tusseau-Vuillemin MH, Meriadec CM, Rousselot O, Mouchel JM (2006) Trace metal speciation and fluxes within a major French wastewater treatment plant: impact of the successive treatment stages. Chemosphere 65:2419–2426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carletti G, Fatone F, Bolzonella D, Cecchi F (2008) Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in large wastewater treatment plants treating municipal and industrial wastewaters. Water Sci Technol 57(9):1329–1336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Li X, Yang Q, Zeng G, Zhang Y (2008) Total concentrations and speciation of heavy metals in municipal sludge from Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan in middle-south region of China. J Hazard Mater 160:324–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chipasa K (2003) Accumulation and fate of selected heavy metals in a biological wastewater treatment system. Waste Manag 23:135–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choubert JM, Pomiés M, Martin Ruel S, Coquery M (2011a) Influent concentrations and removal performances of metals through municipal wastewater treatment processes. Water Sci Technol 63(9):1967–1973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choubert JM, Martin Ruel S, Esperanza M, Budzinski H, Miége C, Lagarrique C, Coquery M (2011b) Limiting the emissions of micro-pollutants: what efficiency can we expect from wastewater treatment plants? Water Sci Technol 63(1):57–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clara M, Kreuzinger N, Strenn B, Gans O, Kroiss H (2005) The solids retention time—a suitable parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Res 39:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier F, Jalby G, Lessard P, Vanrolleghem PA (2009) Modélisation dynamique du comportement des métaux lourds dans des stations d’épuration. Rev Sci Eau 22(4):461–471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Côté P, Buisson H, Praderie M (1998) Immersed membranes activated sludge process applies to the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 38(4–5):437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (1986) Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture. Official Journal L 181 of 04.07.1986

  • EC (1991) Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning urban wastewater treatment. Official Journal L 135 of 30.05.1991

  • EC (2000a) Working Document on Sludge, 3rd Draft. ENV.E.3/LM. Council of the European Community, Brussels, 27 April, 2000

  • EC (2000b) Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal L 327 of 22.12.2000

  • EC (2001a) Pollutants in urban waste water and sewage sludge. Final Report. February, 2001. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001

  • EC (2001b) Disposal and recycling routes for sewage sludge. Part 3-Scientific and technical report. European Commission. DG Environment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 23 October 2001

  • EC (2001c) Disposal and recycling routes for sewage sludge. Part 2-Regulatory report. European Commission. DG Environment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, October 2001

  • EC (2002) Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Official Journal L 37 of 13.02.2003

  • EC (2007) REACH in brief. Environment Directorate General, European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2011) Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Official Journal L 174 of 01.07.2011

  • EC (2013) Directive 2013/39/EU of 12 August 2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Official Journal L 226 of 24.08.2013

  • Emmanuel E, Perrodin Y, Keck G, Blanchard J-M, Vermande P (2005) Ecotoxicological risk assessment of hospital wastewater: a proposed framework for raw effluents discharging into urban sewer network. J Hazard Mater A117:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt N, Firk W, Warnken W (1998) Integration of membrane filtration into the activated sludge process in municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 38(4–5):429–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92:407–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes A, Lloréns M, Sáez J, Soler A, Aguilar MI, Ortuno JF, Meseguer VF (2004) Simple and sequential extractions of heavy metals from different sewage sludges. Chemosphere 54:1039–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone ME, Lester JN (1991) The balance of heavy metals through sewage treatment works. Sci Total Environ 105:259–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone ME, Kirk PWW, Lester JN (1990a) The behaviour of heavy metals during wastewater treatment. I. Cadmium, Chromium and Cooper. Sci Total Environ 95:233–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone ME, Kirk PWW, Lester JN (1990b) The behaviour of heavy metals during wastewater treatment. II. Lead, Nickel and Zinc. Sci Total Environ 95:253–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone ME, Kirk PWW, Lester JN (1990c) The behaviour of heavy metals during wastewater treatment. III. Mercury and Arsenic. Sci Total Environ 95:271–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray NF (2005) Water Technology: An Introduction for Environmental Scientists and Engineers, 2nd edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M (2002) Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Høibye L, Clauson-Kaas J, Wenzel H, Larsen HF, Jacobsen BN, Dalgaard O (2008) Sustainability of advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Water Sci Technol 58(5):963–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CP, Wang JM (2001) Factors affecting the distribution of heavy metals in wastewater treatment processes: role of sludge particulate. Water Sci Technol 44(10):47–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judd S (2006) The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors in water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd S (2008) The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends Biotechnol 26(2):109–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karvelas M, Katsoyiannis A, Samara C (2003) Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in the wastewater treatment process. Chemosphere 53:1201–1210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katsoyiannis A, Samara C (2007) The fate of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the wastewater treatment process and its importance in the removal of wastewater contaminants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(5):284–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khudenko BM (1996) Comprehensive fate model for metals in municipal wastewater treatment—discussion by Boris M. Khudenko. J Environ Eng 122:164–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lasheen MR, Ammar NS (2009) Assessment of metals speciation in sewage sludge and stabilized sludge from different wastewater treatment plans, Greater Cairo, Egypt. J Hazard Mater 164(1–2):740–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantis I, Voutsa D, Samara S (2005) Assessment of the environmental hazard from municipal and industrial wastewater treatment sludge by employing chemical and biological methods. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 62:397–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson A, Mattsson J, Davidsson F (2012) A strategy for reducing pollutants at source in order to obtain sustainable agricultural recycling of wastewater sludge. Water Sci Technol 66(9):1879–1884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Chae S-R, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin H, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merrington G, Oliver I, Smernik RJ, McLaughlin MJ (2003) The influence of sewage sludge properties on sludge-borne metal availability. Adv Environ Res 8:21–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy Inc (2003) Wastewater engineering. Treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw Hill International Editions, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudho A, Kumar S (2013) Effects of heavy metals as stress factors on anaerobic digestion processes and biogas production from biomass. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:1383–1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo J, Busquets D, Dalmau J, López B, Muñoz V, Rodriguez-Roda I (2011) Improving urban wastewater management through an auction-based management of discharges. Environ Model Softw 26:689–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabizadeh R, Mahvi A, Mardani G, Yunesian M (2005) Study of heavy metals in urban runoff. Int J Environ Sci Technol 1(4):325–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2002) Biosolids applied to land: advancing standards and practices. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson U, Lundstedt S, Haglund P (2010) Behaviour and fate of anthropogenic substances at a Swedish sewage treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 62(12):2880–2888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson U, Bignert A, Haglund P (2012) Time-trends of metals and organic contaminants in sewage sludge. Water Res 46:4841–4851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson U, Brorström-Lundén E, Kylin H, Haglund P (2013) Comprehensive mass flow analysis of Swedish sludge contaminants. Chemosphere 90:28–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker WJ, Monteith HD, Bell JP, Melcer H, Berthouex PM (1994) Comprehensive fate model for metals in municipal wastewater treatment. J Environ Eng 120(5):1266–1283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plósz BG, Benedetti L, Daigger GT, Langford KH, Larsen HF, Monteith H, Ort C, Seth R, Steyer JP, Vanrolleghem PA (2013) Modelling micro-pollutant fate in wastewater collection and treatment systems: status and challenges. Water Sci Technol 67(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomiès M, Choubert J-M, Wisniewski C, Coquery M (2013) Modelling of micropollutant removal in biological wastewater treatments: a review. Sci Total Environ 443:733–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossin AC, Sterrit RM, Lester JN (1982) The influence of process parameters on the removal of heavy metals in activated sludge. Water Air Soil Pollut 17:185–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruel SM, Choubert J-M, Ginestet P, Coquery M (2008) Semi-quantitative analysis of a specific database on priority and emerging substances in wastewater and sludge. Water Sci Technol 57(12):1935–1942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruel SM, Choubert J-M, Budzinski H, Miège C, Esperanza M (2012) Occurence and fate of relevant substances in wastewater treatment plants regarding Water Framework Directive and future legislations. Water Sci Technol 65(7):1179–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rule KL, Comber SDW, Ross D, Thornton A, Makropoulos CK, Rautiu R (2006) Diffuse sources of heavy metals entering an urban wastewater catchment. Chemosphere 63:64–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salado R, Daly E, Vencovsky D, Zamparutti T, Palfrey R (2008) Environmental, economic and social impacts of the use of sewage sludge on land. Consultation report on options and impacts prepared by RPA, Milieu Ltd and WRc for the European Commission, DG Environment under Study Contract DG ENV.G.4/ETU/2008/0076r

  • Scancar J, Milacic R, Strazar M, Burica O (2000) Total metal concentrations and partitioning of Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni and Zn in sewage sludge. Sci Total Environ 250:9–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sörme L, Lagerkvist R (2002) Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm. Sci Total Environ 298:13–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sörme L, Lindqvist A, Söderberg H (2003) Capacity to influence sources of heavy metals to wastewater treatment sludge. Environ Manage 31(3):421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson T, Lawson PS, Rudd T, Sterrit RM, Lester JN (1987) Mechanism of metal removal in activated sludge. J Environ Eng 113:1074–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianou MA, Kollia D, Haralambous K, Inglezakis VJ, Moustakas G, Loizidou MD (2007) Effect of acid treatment on the removal of heavy metals from sewage sludge. Desalination 215:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1995) Process Design Manual for land application of sewage sludge and domestic septage. EPA/625/R-95/001, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC

  • Vanhooren H, Meirlaen J, Amerlinck Y, Claeys F, Vangheluwe H, Vanrolleghem A (2003) WEST: modelling biological wastewater treatment. J Hydroinform 5(1):27–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Huang CP, Allen HE (2006) Predicting metals partitioning in wastewater treatment plant influents. Water Res 40:1333–1340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Youshizaki S, Tomida T (2000) Principle and process of heavy metal removal from sewage sludge. Environ Sci Technol 34:1572–1575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to the Department of Chemical Engineering, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, to the Laboratory of Biofuels and Environment, National Laboratory of Energy and Geology, and to the Project FCT/UID/QUI/00100/2013 for the support in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Cantinho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cantinho, P., Matos, M., Trancoso, M.A. et al. Behaviour and fate of metals in urban wastewater treatment plants: a review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 359–386 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0887-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0887-x

Keywords

Navigation