Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of hydrophile–lipophile balance and sodium tripolyphosphate on the properties of biological deinked pulps

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The benefits of bio-deinking of waste paper are investigated in this study. Enzymatic modification of mixed office waste paper and old magazine pulps was performed at two temperatures, 20 and 50 °C. Nonionic surfactant with different hydrophile–lipophile balance values and sodium tripolyphosphate was used as the deinking agent. The deinking process was conducted for pulps with and without enzymatic treatment. The results show that, for mixed office waste paper and old magazine pulps, the highest strength properties are achieved using lower hydrophile–lipophile balance at 20 and 50 °C, respectively, while using higher hydrophile–lipophile balance has a significant influence on the optical properties at 50 °C. Further, the results show in the presence of sodium tripolyphosphate, the optical properties of treated pulps, especially old magazine pulp significantly improved at 20 °C (ESST system). For mixed office waste paper, the optimum values of burst, tear and tensile indices, folding endurance, E-MOD, tensile energy absorption and elongation are 2.97 (kPa m2/g), 7.68 (mN m2/g), 93.47 (N m/g), 13, 8024 (GPa), 100.16 (J/m2) and 2.53 (%), respectively. Moreover, the results from measuring optical properties of handsheets show that the optimum values of brightness, dirt count, dirt area and deinking efficiency are 44.72 (%), 11, 0.221 (mm2) and 78.07 (%) correspondingly, while for old magazine, the formers are 2.35 (kPa m2/g), 6.77 (mN m2/g), 77.77 (N m/g), 9, 6199 (GPa), 72.61 (J/m2) and 2.37 (%) and the latters are 60.93 (%), 1, 0.005 (mm2) and 99.52 (%), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bobu E, Ciolacu F, Cretu A (2008) Deinkability of mixed prints: alkaline vs. neutral deinking. Prog Pap Recycl 18(1):23–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elegir G, Panizza E, Canetti M (2000) Neutral enzyme deinking of office waste with amylase/cellulase xerographic assisted mixture. Tappi J 83(11):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker A, Thompson R, Manning A (2007) Novel solutions to new problems in paper deinking. Pigment Resin Tech 36(3):141–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gübitz GM, Mansfield SD, Böhm D, Saddler JN (1998) Effect of endoglucanases and hemicellulases in magnetic and flotation deinking of xerographic and laser-printed papers. J Biotechnol 65:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannuksela T, Rosencrance S (2008) Deinking Chemistry. Published online as chapter six, deinking primer, pp 1–12

  • Heise OU, Unwin JP, Klungness JH, Fineran WG, Sykes MS, Abubakr S (1997) Industrial scaleup of enzyme-enhanced deinking of nonimpact printed toners. Tappi J 79(3):207–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibara D, Monte MC, Blanco A, Martinez AT, Martinez MJ (2012) Enzymatic deinking of secondary fibers: cellulases/hemicellulases versus laccase-mediator system. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries TW, Klungness JH, Sykes S, Rutledge-Cropsey K (1994) Comparison of enzyme-enhanced with conventional deinking of xerographic and laser-printed paper. Tappi J 77(4):173–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries TW, Sykes MS, Rutledge-Cropsey K, Klungness JH, Abubakr S (1995) Enhanced removal of toners from office waste papers by microbial cellulases. In: Sixth international conference on biotech. Pulp and Paper Industry, pp 141–144

  • Kim TJ, Ow SK, Eom TJ (1991) Enzymatic deinking methods waste paper. In: Tappi pulping conference proceedings, pp 1023–1031

  • Knudsen O, Young JD, Yang JL (1998) Long-term use of enzymatic deinking at Stora Dalum plant. In: Seventh international conference biotech. Pulp Paper Industry, pp A17–A20

  • Marques S, Pala H, Alves L, Amaral-Collaço MT, Gama FM, Gίrio FM (2003) Characterisation and application of glycanases secreted by Aspergillus terreus CCMI 498 and Trichoderma viride CCMI 84 for enzymatic deinking of mixed office wastepaper. J Biotechnol 100(3):209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayeli N, Talaeipour M (2010) Effect of different HLB value and enzymatic treatment on the properties of old newspaper deinked pulp. Bioresour J 5(4):2520–2534

    Google Scholar 

  • Misner M (1992) The emerging world of deinking. Waste Age, pp 86–94

  • Morrow H, Horacek B, Hale K, Rosencrance S (2005) True-neutral deinking. Paper Age 121:34–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano J (1993) Recent research trends of pulping chemistry. Appik J 25(1):85–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh JT, Park KN, Park JW, Kim JH (1997) Effects of HLB value of surfactant on enzymatic deinking process. J Ind Eng Chem 3(1):7–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick K (2004) Enzyme technology improves efficiency, cost, safety of stickies removal program. Paper Age 120(6):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Pèlach MA, Pastor FJ, Puig J, Vilaseca F, Mutjè P (2003) Enzymic deinking of old newspapers with cellulase. Process Biochem J 38(7):1063–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge-Cropsey K, Klungness JH, Abubakr S (1998) Performance of enzymatically deinked recovered paper on paper machine runnability. Tappi J 81(2):148–151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senior DJ, Hamilton J (1992) Biobleaching with xylanses brings biotechnology to Reality. Pulp Paper 66(9):111–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shrinath A, Szewczak JT, Bowen IJ (1991) A review of ink removal techniques in current deinking technology. Tappi J 74:85–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes MS, Tan F (1997) Enzymatic removal of stickie contaminants. In: Tappi pulping conference proceedings, pp 687–691

  • Sykes MS, Klungness JH, Gleisner R, Abubakr S (1998) Stickie removal using neutral enzymatic repulping and pressure screening. In: Tappi recycling, symposium notes, pp 291–297

  • Vyas S, Lachke A (2003) Biodeinking of mixed office waste paper by alkaline active cellulases from alkalotolerant Fusarium sp. Enzyme Microb Technol 32(10):236–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu QH, Fu Y, Gao Y, Qin M (2009) Performance and efficiency of old newspaper deinking by combining cellulase/hemicellulase with laccase-violuric acid system. Waste Manag J 29(5):1486–1490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Wang YP, Qin MH, Fu YJ, Li ZQ, Zhang FS, Li JH (2011) Fiber surface characterization of old newsprint pulp deinked by combining hemicellulase with laccase-mediator system. Bioresour J 102(11):6536–6540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeyer C, Joyce TW, Heitmann JA, Rucker JW (1994) Factors influencing enzyme deinking of recycled fiber. Tappi J 77(10):169–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Renaud S, Paice M (2008) Cellulase deinking of fresh and aged recycled newsprint/magazines (ONP/OMG). Enzyme Microb Technol 43(2):103–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zöllner HK, Schroeder LR (1998) Enzymatic deinking of nonimpact printed white office paper with a-amylase. Tappi J 81(3):166–170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge support from the CHOUKA company of Gilan and Mahd-e-Tage company of Tehran, Iran, for the use of laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Mayeli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayeli, N., Talaeipour, M. Influence of hydrophile–lipophile balance and sodium tripolyphosphate on the properties of biological deinked pulps. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 3587–3596 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0794-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0794-1

Keywords

Navigation