Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Willingness to pay for improved residential waste management in a developing country

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most developing countries policies and frameworks that govern solid waste management strategies have often been directed at the waste management service providers and less attention is often given to the demand side of the problem. This paper reports a study regarding householders’ willingness to pay for improved residential solid waste management. The data for the study originated from a contingent valuation survey that was conducted in 236 households in Ilorin city in Kwara State, Nigeria. A binary logit model was used to account for some factors influencing the respondents’ willingness to pay. The results show that more than 80 % of the respondents were in support of the residential waste management. The respondents were willing to pay an average of 3,660 Nigerian Naira (US $24) each year. Income, education, dwelling type and whether the respondent is satisfied with private sector participation in provision of waste management service positively influenced the respondents’ willingness to pay. The price, gender, household size and activities of sanitary inspectors had negative influence. The findings from this study could contribute to the knowledge regarding the design of a more sustainable residential waste management strategy in Nigeria and other countries that have similar conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aderamo AJ (2000) Spatial pattern of intra-urban trips in Ilorin. Geo-studies 1(1–2):47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Alta AA, Deshaz OJ (1996) Households demand for improved solid waste management, a case study of Gujarwala, Pakistan. World Dev 24(5):857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anaman KA, Jair RM (2000) Contingent valuation of solid waste collection services for rural households in Brunei Darussalam. Singap Econ Rev 45(2):223–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Awomuti AA (2008) An analysis of waste generation rate and pattern in Ilorin, Nigeria. Lapai Int J Manag Soc Sci 1(1):171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop RC, Champ PA, Mullarkey DJ (1995) Contingent valuation. In: Bromley DW (ed) The handbook of environmental economics. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (2004) Contingent valuation: a comprehensive bibliography and history. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Champ PA, Boyle K, Brown TC (eds) (2003) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuen-Khee P, Othman J (2010) Household demand for solid waste disposal options in Malaysia. Int J Hum Soc Sci 5(14):905–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Driesen D (2006) Economic instruments for sustainable development. In: Richardson BJ, Wood S (eds) Environmental law for sustainability. Hart Publishing, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezebilo EE (2010) Conservation of a leafy vegetable important for communities in the Nigerian rainforest. For Ecol Manage 259(8):1660–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezebilo EE, Animasaun ED (2011) Households’ perceptions of private sector municipal solid waste management services: a binary choice analysis. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(4):677–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezebilo EE, Mattsson L, Afolami CA (2010) Economic value of ecotourism to local communities in the Nigerian rainforest zone. J Sustain Dev 3(1):51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod G, Willis KG (1999) Economic valuation of the environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellynck X, Verhelst P (2007) Assessing instruments for mixed household solid waste collection services in the Flemish region of Belgium. Resour Conserv Recycl 49(4):372–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle H, Rees P (2004) Micro-economics. Pearson Education Limited, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann M (1989) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: reply. Am J Agric Econ 71(4):1057–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Shogren JF, White B (2007) Environmental economics in theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Imandoust SB, Gadam SN (2007) Are people willing to pay for river water quality, contingent valuation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4(3):401–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin J, Wang Z, Ran S (2006) Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao. Ecol Econ 57(3):430–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku S-J, Yoo S-H, Kwak S-J (2009) Willingness to pay for improving the residential waste disposal system in Korea: a choice experiment study. Environ Manage 44(2):278–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwara State of Nigeria (1997) Kwara state diary. Government Press, Ilorin

    Google Scholar 

  • Longe EO, Ukpebor EF (2009) Survey of household waste generation and composition in Ojo Local Government Area, Lagos State, Nigeria. Int J Geotech Environ 1(1):41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Longe EO, Longe OO, Ukpebor EF (2009) People’s perception on household solid waste management in Ojo Local Government Area in Nigeria. Iran J Health Sci Eng 3(3):209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB (1993) Integrated public lands management: principles and applications to national forests, parks, wildlife refuges and BLM lands. Columbia University press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McKerlie K, Knight N, Thorpe B (2006) Advancing extended producer responsibility in Canada. J Clean Prod 14(6–7):616–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the future, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • National Population Commission (2006) Final Results of National Census, Kwara State. National Population Commission, Abuja, Nigeria

  • Niringiye A, Omortor DG (2010) Determinants of willingness to pay for solid waste management in Kampala city. Curr Res J Econ Theory 2(3):119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Palatnik R, Ayalon O, Shechter M (2005) Household demand for waste recycling services. Environ Manag 35(2):121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahji MAY, Oloruntoba EO (2009) Determinants of households’ willingness to pay for private solid waste management services in Ibadan, Nigeria. Waste Manag Res 27(12):961–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shih LH, Chou TY (2011) Customer concerns about uncertainty and willingness to pay in leasing solar power system. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(3):523–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack RJ, Gronow JR, Voulvoulis N (2009) The management of household waste in the United Kingdom. J Environ Manag 90(1):36–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford SL (2002) The effect of punishment on firm compliance with hazardous waste regulations. J Environ Econ Manag 44(2):290–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg T, Lewis L (2010) Environmental economics and policy. Pearson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner T, Arnold P (2008) A new model for solid waste management: an analysis of the Nova Scotia municipal solid waste strategy. J Clean Prod 16(4):410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner CM, Turner J, Shipman K, Twitchell FS, Dickson BR, Bruschke GV (1995) Commitment, behaviour and attitude change: an analysis of voluntary recycling. J Environ Psychol 15(3):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf SA, Salimonu KK, Ojo OT (2007) Determinants of willingness to pay for improved household waste management in Oyo State, Nigeria. Res J Appl Sci 2(3):233–239

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank all Ilorin residents who spent their valuable time in attending the survey. Appreciation goes to Emmanuel Animasaun of Malmö University for helping in collecting the data. I thank anonymous persons who reviewed this paper for their useful comments. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. Ezebilo.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Correlation matrix for factors influencing willingness to pay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ezebilo, E.E. Willingness to pay for improved residential waste management in a developing country. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10, 413–422 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0171-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0171-2

Keywords

Navigation