Abstract
Carsharing as a mode, in any of its different forms, has the peculiarity of being accessible only to members. The research presented in this paper focuses on round-trip-based carsharing, where vehicles are parked at fixed locations, called in this paper stations. Round-trip-based carsharing has been the first successful form of carsharing, and is still the most diffused one in many countries. Several studies looked at the potential of such a system in various countries but the link between spatial distribution of the stations and potential membership has not been done yet. This paper looks at this question while trying to address other limitations of the existing literature on carsharing potential. The research has two parts. In the first part, a binary logistic model of round-trip based carsharing membership in Switzerland is estimated. The model is based on a large RP dataset (the Swiss national travel diaries survey) where information on carsharing membership is collected. This provides a representative and non-biased sample. The model takes into account accessibility to carsharing at local level introducing a dependency between potential membership and actual availability of the service. The model is then run on a synthetic population representing the whole Swiss population—created based on full census data—and then validated against actual membership data of the Swiss carsharing operator Mobility. It is shown that the model estimated is able to reproduce fairly well the spatial distribution of carsharing members in Switzerland. The second part is aimed at showing that the location of stations actually impacts potential membership. To this purpose an approach to solve the problem of the optimal location of carsharing stations is proposed, where the model estimated in the first part is used as objective function of an optimization algorithm. The region surrounding the city of Zurich is taken as case study for this approach. The proposed technique is suitable to find new constellations of stations so that the number of carsharing members is incremented and can also be seen as an innovative instrument which can help in the planning of carsharing station networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahrens G (2014) Forschungsprojekt, Mobilität in Städten–SrV’ Erhebungsdurchgang 2013. Fragenkatalog standard, TU Dresden
Ahuja RK, Orlin JB, Tiwari A (2000) A greedy genetic algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. Comput Oper Res 27(10):917–934
ARE and BfS (2007) Mobilität in der Schweiz, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2005 zum Verkehrsverhalten. Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung; BFS Statistik der Schweiz, Neuchâtel
ARE and BfS (2012) Mobilität in der Schweiz, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2010 zum Verkehrsverhalten. Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung; BFS Statistik der Schweiz, Neuchâtel
BFS (2010) Eidgenössische Registererhebung. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/news/02/03/01.html
BFS (2010) Eidgenössische Strukturerhebung. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/news/02/03/02.html
Ciari F, Balmer M, Axhausen KW (2007) Mobility tool ownership and mode choice decision processes in multi-agent transportation simulation, paper presented at the 7th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona
Ciari F, Balmer M, Axhausen KW (2008) A new mode choice model for a multi-agent transport simulation, paper presented at the 8th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona
Ciari F, Schuessler N, Axhausen KW (2012) Estimation of carsharing demand using an activity-based microsimulation approach: model discussion and some results. Int J Sustain Transp 7(1):70–84
Correia GHdA, Antunes AP (2012) Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 48(1):233–247
Drezner Z, Hamacher HW (2004) Facility location: applications and theory. Springer, New York
Efthymiou D, Antniou C, Waddell P (2012) Which factors affect the propensity to join vehicle sharing systems? presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C
Fröhlich Ph, Tschopp M, Axhausen KW (2005) Netzmodelle und Erreichbarkeit in der Schweiz: 1950-2000. In: Axhausen KW, Hurni L (eds) Zeitkarten Schweiz 1950–2000. Kapitel 2, IVT and IKA, ETH Zürich, Zürich
Goldberg DE, Lingle R (1985) Alleles, loci, and the TSP, proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Pittsburgh, pp 154–159
Haefeli U (2006) Evaluation of Carsharing. Bundesamt für Energie BFE, Bern
Hale TS, Moberg CR (2003) Location science research: a review. Ann Oper Res 123(1–4):21–35
Jaramillo JH, Bhadury J, Batta R (2002) On the use of genetic algorithms to solve location problems. Comput Oper Res 29(6):761–779
Katzev R, Brook D, Nice M (2000) The effects of car sharing on travel behaviour: analyisis of carsharing Portland’s firs year. World Transp Policy Pract 7(1):22–26
Killer V, Axhausen KW (2011) Understanding overlapping functional commuting regions with confidence ellipses and social network methods, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, vol 714. IVT, ETH Zurich, Zurich
Lane C (2005) PhillyCarShare: first-year social and mobility impacts of car sharing in Philadelphia, presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C
Le Vine S (2012) Strategies for personal mobility: a study of consumer acceptance of subscription drive-it-yourself car-services, Dissertation, Imperial College London
Martens K, Sierzchula W, Pasman S (2011) Broadening the market for carshare? Results of a Pilot Project in the Netherlands, presented at the 90st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C
Matsim (2012) Matsim Agent-based Transport simulations, webpage, June 2014. http://matsim.org/
Millard-Ball A, Murray G, ter Schure J, Fox C, Burkhardt J (2005) Carsharing: where and how it succeeds, TCRP Report, 108. TRB, Washington D.C
Morency C, Trépanier M, Martin B (2008) Object-oriented analysis of carsharing system. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2063:105–112
Muheim P (1998) Carsharing: the key to combined mobility, energy 2000. BFE Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Bern
Müller K, Axhausen KW (2014) Using survey calibration and statistical matching to reweight and distribute activity schedules, paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C
Nobis C (2006) Car sharing as a key contribution to multimodal and sustainable mobility behavior—the situation of car sharing in Germany, paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C
Petersen M (1995) Ökonomische Analyse des Car-Sharing. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden
Prettenthaler FE, Steininger KW (1999) From ownership to service use lifestyle: the potential of car sharing. Ecol Econ 28(3):443–453
Sastry K, Goldberg D, Kendall G (2005) Genetic algorithms. In: Search methodologies: introductory tutorials in in optimization and decision support techniques. Berlin, pp 97–125
Schuster TD, Byrne J, Corbette J, Schreuder Y (2005) Assessing the potential of carsharing: a new method and its implications. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1927:174–181
Schwartz J (2005) Quality in carsharing, presented at keys to carsharing: moving the city of tomorrow. Bruxelles
Shaheen SA, Cohen AP (2013) Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends. Int J Sustain Transp 7(1):5–34
Sivanandam S, Deepa S (2008) Genetic algorithm optimization problems. Springer, New York
Uesugi K, Mukai N, Watanabe T (2007) Optimization of vehicle assignment for car sharing system. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4693(2):1105–1111
UK National Statistics Authority (2014) National Travel Survey Statistics. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-travel-survey-statistics
Weis C (2012) Activity oriented modelling of short- and long-term dynamics of travel behaviour, Dissertation, IVT, ETH Zürich, Zürich
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ciari, F., Weis, C. & Balac, M. Evaluating the influence of carsharing stations’ location on potential membership: a Swiss case study. EURO J Transp Logist 5, 345–369 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-015-0076-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-015-0076-6