Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the influence of carsharing stations’ location on potential membership: a Swiss case study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics

Abstract

Carsharing as a mode, in any of its different forms, has the peculiarity of being accessible only to members. The research presented in this paper focuses on round-trip-based carsharing, where vehicles are parked at fixed locations, called in this paper stations. Round-trip-based carsharing has been the first successful form of carsharing, and is still the most diffused one in many countries. Several studies looked at the potential of such a system in various countries but the link between spatial distribution of the stations and potential membership has not been done yet. This paper looks at this question while trying to address other limitations of the existing literature on carsharing potential. The research has two parts. In the first part, a binary logistic model of round-trip based carsharing membership in Switzerland is estimated. The model is based on a large RP dataset (the Swiss national travel diaries survey) where information on carsharing membership is collected. This provides a representative and non-biased sample. The model takes into account accessibility to carsharing at local level introducing a dependency between potential membership and actual availability of the service. The model is then run on a synthetic population representing the whole Swiss population—created based on full census data—and then validated against actual membership data of the Swiss carsharing operator Mobility. It is shown that the model estimated is able to reproduce fairly well the spatial distribution of carsharing members in Switzerland. The second part is aimed at showing that the location of stations actually impacts potential membership. To this purpose an approach to solve the problem of the optimal location of carsharing stations is proposed, where the model estimated in the first part is used as objective function of an optimization algorithm. The region surrounding the city of Zurich is taken as case study for this approach. The proposed technique is suitable to find new constellations of stations so that the number of carsharing members is incremented and can also be seen as an innovative instrument which can help in the planning of carsharing station networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens G (2014) Forschungsprojekt, Mobilität in Städten–SrV’ Erhebungsdurchgang 2013. Fragenkatalog standard, TU Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja RK, Orlin JB, Tiwari A (2000) A greedy genetic algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. Comput Oper Res 27(10):917–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARE and BfS (2007) Mobilität in der Schweiz, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2005 zum Verkehrsverhalten. Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung; BFS Statistik der Schweiz, Neuchâtel

    Google Scholar 

  • ARE and BfS (2012) Mobilität in der Schweiz, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2010 zum Verkehrsverhalten. Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung; BFS Statistik der Schweiz, Neuchâtel

  • BFS (2010) Eidgenössische Registererhebung. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/news/02/03/01.html

  • BFS (2010) Eidgenössische Strukturerhebung. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/news/02/03/02.html

  • Ciari F, Balmer M, Axhausen KW (2007) Mobility tool ownership and mode choice decision processes in multi-agent transportation simulation, paper presented at the 7th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona

  • Ciari F, Balmer M, Axhausen KW (2008) A new mode choice model for a multi-agent transport simulation, paper presented at the 8th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona

  • Ciari F, Schuessler N, Axhausen KW (2012) Estimation of carsharing demand using an activity-based microsimulation approach: model discussion and some results. Int J Sustain Transp 7(1):70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia GHdA, Antunes AP (2012) Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 48(1):233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Hamacher HW (2004) Facility location: applications and theory. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Efthymiou D, Antniou C, Waddell P (2012) Which factors affect the propensity to join vehicle sharing systems? presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C

  • Fröhlich Ph, Tschopp M, Axhausen KW (2005) Netzmodelle und Erreichbarkeit in der Schweiz: 1950-2000. In: Axhausen KW, Hurni L (eds) Zeitkarten Schweiz 1950–2000. Kapitel 2, IVT and IKA, ETH Zürich, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Lingle R (1985) Alleles, loci, and the TSP, proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Pittsburgh, pp 154–159

  • Haefeli U (2006) Evaluation of Carsharing. Bundesamt für Energie BFE, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale TS, Moberg CR (2003) Location science research: a review. Ann Oper Res 123(1–4):21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo JH, Bhadury J, Batta R (2002) On the use of genetic algorithms to solve location problems. Comput Oper Res 29(6):761–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzev R, Brook D, Nice M (2000) The effects of car sharing on travel behaviour: analyisis of carsharing Portland’s firs year. World Transp Policy Pract 7(1):22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Killer V, Axhausen KW (2011) Understanding overlapping functional commuting regions with confidence ellipses and social network methods, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, vol 714. IVT, ETH Zurich, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane C (2005) PhillyCarShare: first-year social and mobility impacts of car sharing in Philadelphia, presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C

  • Le Vine S (2012) Strategies for personal mobility: a study of consumer acceptance of subscription drive-it-yourself car-services, Dissertation, Imperial College London

  • Martens K, Sierzchula W, Pasman S (2011) Broadening the market for carshare? Results of a Pilot Project in the Netherlands, presented at the 90st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C

  • Matsim (2012) Matsim Agent-based Transport simulations, webpage, June 2014. http://matsim.org/

  • Millard-Ball A, Murray G, ter Schure J, Fox C, Burkhardt J (2005) Carsharing: where and how it succeeds, TCRP Report, 108. TRB, Washington D.C

  • Morency C, Trépanier M, Martin B (2008) Object-oriented analysis of carsharing system. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2063:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muheim P (1998) Carsharing: the key to combined mobility, energy 2000. BFE Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller K, Axhausen KW (2014) Using survey calibration and statistical matching to reweight and distribute activity schedules, paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C

  • Nobis C (2006) Car sharing as a key contribution to multimodal and sustainable mobility behavior—the situation of car sharing in Germany, paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C

  • Petersen M (1995) Ökonomische Analyse des Car-Sharing. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prettenthaler FE, Steininger KW (1999) From ownership to service use lifestyle: the potential of car sharing. Ecol Econ 28(3):443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry K, Goldberg D, Kendall G (2005) Genetic algorithms. In: Search methodologies: introductory tutorials in in optimization and decision support techniques. Berlin, pp 97–125

  • Schuster TD, Byrne J, Corbette J, Schreuder Y (2005) Assessing the potential of carsharing: a new method and its implications. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1927:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J (2005) Quality in carsharing, presented at keys to carsharing: moving the city of tomorrow. Bruxelles

  • Shaheen SA, Cohen AP (2013) Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends. Int J Sustain Transp 7(1):5–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivanandam S, Deepa S (2008) Genetic algorithm optimization problems. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uesugi K, Mukai N, Watanabe T (2007) Optimization of vehicle assignment for car sharing system. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4693(2):1105–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK National Statistics Authority (2014) National Travel Survey Statistics. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-travel-survey-statistics

  • Weis C (2012) Activity oriented modelling of short- and long-term dynamics of travel behaviour, Dissertation, IVT, ETH Zürich, Zürich

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Ciari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ciari, F., Weis, C. & Balac, M. Evaluating the influence of carsharing stations’ location on potential membership: a Swiss case study. EURO J Transp Logist 5, 345–369 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-015-0076-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-015-0076-6

Keywords

Navigation