Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Continent Urinary Diversion in the Elderly

  • Geriatric Urology (TJ Guzzo and DJ Canter, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Geriatrics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elderly patients are disproportionally affected by conditions that necessitate the use of urinary diversion. The surgical diversion of urine can be accomplished in multiple ways, both in a continent and incontinent fashion. Advanced age has traditionally been correlated with lower rates of continent urinary diversion than younger patient populations. Additionally, there is a paucity of data regarding continent urinary diversion in the elderly. Elderly patients face a number of unique challenges in the selection, construction, and care of continent urinary diversion. This update will serve to the outline pertinent issues currently faced by elderly patients undergoing continent urinary diversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Clark PE, Stein JP, Groshen SG, Cai J, Miranda G, Lieskovsky G. Radical cystectomy in the elderly: comparison of clinical outcomes between younger and older patients. Cancer. 2005;104(1):36–43. This study gives a detailed breakdown of complications seen afterradical cystectomy across age groups in a large case series.

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor 3rd JA, Kuchel GA. Bladder cancer in the elderly: clinical outcomes, basic mechanisms, and future research direction. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009;6:135–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Etling LS, Pettaway C, Bekele BN, Grossman HB, Cooksley, et al. Correlation between annual volume of cystectomy, professional staffing, and outcomes: a state-wide, population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104(5):975–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Froehner M, Brausi MA, Herr HW, Muto G, Studer UE. Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol. 2009;56(3):443–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gore JL, Saigal CS, Hanley JM, Schonlau M, Litwin MS. Variations in reconstruction after radical cystectomy. Cancer. 2006;107:729–37.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sogni F, Brausi M, Frea B, Martinengo C, Faggiano F, Tizzani A, et al. Morbidity and quality of life in elderly patients receiving ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Urology. 2008;71(5):991–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saika T, Suyama B, Murata T, Manabe D, Kurashige T, Nasu Y, et al. Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in elderly bladder cancer patients. Int J Urol. 2001;8(10):533–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takenaka A, Soga H, Terakawa T, Kumano M, Furukawa J, Muramake M, et al. Assessment of voiding function of orthotopic neobladders in elderly patients with long-term survival. BJU Int. 2009;103(7):927–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein JP, Skinner DG. Surgical Atlas: the orthotopic T-pouch ileal neobladder. BJU Int. 2006;98:469–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Studer UE, Varol C, Danuser H. Orthotopic ileal neobladder. BJU Int. 2004;93:183–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmadi H, Skinner EC, Simma-Chiang V, Miranda G, Cai J, Penson DF, et al. Urinary functional outcomes following radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal neobladder reconstruction in male patients. J Urol. 2013;189(5):1782–8. This study provides rigorousprospective and retrospective analysis of continence after orthotopic urinary diversion.

  13. Steers WD. Voiding dysfunction in the orthotopic neobladder. World J Urol. 2000;18:330–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Daneshmand S, et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int. 2014;113:11–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner M, Bayne A, Daneshmand S. Application of the Yang-Monti channel in adult continent cutaneous urinary diversion. Urology. 2008;72(4):828–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurzrock E, Skinner DG, Stein JP. Hemi-T pouch modification for pediatric urinary diversion. J Urol. 2003;170(3):949–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harris CF, Cooper CS, Hutcheson JC, Snyder 3rd HM. Appendicovesicostomy: the Mitrofanoff procedure-a 15-year perspective. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1922–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tollefson MK, Elliott DS, Zincke H, Frank I. Long-term outcome of ureterosigmoidostomy: an analysis of patients with >10 years of follow-up. BJU Int. 2010;105(6):860–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG, Schumacher MC, Gschwend JE, Studer UE. Long-term results of standard procedures in urology: the ileal neobladder. World J Urol. 2006;249(3):305–14. This study describes the long-term sequelae of orthotopic diversion and includes manyelderly patients.

  20. Rink R, Kluth L, Eichelberg E, Fisch M, Dahlem R. Continent catheterizable pouches for urinary diversion. Eur Urol. 2010;9:754–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knap MM, Lundbeck F, Overgaard J. Early and late treatment-related morbidity following radical cystectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38:153–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamanaka K, Miyake H, Hara I, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M. Significance of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients over 80 years old. Int Urol Nephol. 2007;39:209–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hautmann RE, Hautmann SH, Hautmann O. Complications associated with urinary diversion. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:667–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritter R, Gakis G, Stenzl A. Urinary incontinence and retention in the female neobladder why does this occur and treatment options? Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2012;7:309–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. Lessons learned from 1,000 neobladders: the 90-day complication rate. J Urol. 2010;184(3):990–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Daneshmand S, Ahmadi H, Schuckman AK, Mitra AP, Cai J, Miranda G, Djaladat H. Enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2014; 192(1).

  27. Stein JP, Dunn MD, Quek ML, Miranda G, Skinner DG. The orthotopic T pouch ileal neobladder: experience with 209 patients. J Urol. 2004;172(2):584–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Madersbacher S, Mohrie K, Burkhard F, et al. Long-term voiding pattern of patients with ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes. J Urol. 2002;167:2025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dahl DM, McDougal WS. Use of intestinal segments in urinary diversion. Campbell-Walsh urology ninth edition. 2007; 2400–49.

  30. Bartsch G, Daneshmand S, Skinner EC, Syan S, Skinner DG, Penson DF. Urinary functional outcomes in female neobladder patients. World J Urol. 2014;32:221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Holmes DG, Thrasher JB, Park GY, Kueker DC, Weigel JW. Long-term complications related to the modified Indiana pouch. Urology. 2002;60:603–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Turk TM, Koleski FC, Albala DM. Incidence of urolithiasis in cystectomy patients after intestinal conduit or continent urinary diversion. World J Urol. 1999;17:305–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Syan S, Daneshmand S. Management of the continent cutaneous stomal complications. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2012;7:294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ashley MS, Ahmadi H, Dalag L, Miranda G, Djaladat H, Schuckman A, et al. Orthotopic urinary diversion following radical cystectomy in the elderly: continence and complications in 221 patients. Wailea: Poster presented at annual meeting of the Western Section of the American Urologic Association; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Daneshmand S, Bartsch G. Improving selection of appropriate urinary diversion following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011;11:191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Kessler TM, Thoeny H, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute—lessons to be learned. J Urol. 2006;176(1):161–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kauf TL, Svatek RS, Amiel G, Beard TL, Chang SS, Fergany A, et al. Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, is associated with reduced costs after radical cystectomy: economic analysis of a phase 4 randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2014;191(6):1721–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Siamak Daneshmand and Matt S. Ashley declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siamak Daneshmand.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Geriatric Urology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daneshmand, S., Ashley, M.S. Continent Urinary Diversion in the Elderly. Curr Geri Rep 4, 1–6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-014-0118-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-014-0118-1

Keywords

Navigation