Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Critical Care: Evolution, Current State, and Future Prospects

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Current Pulmonology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Wong A, Olusanya O, Watchorn J, Bramham K, Hutchings S. Utility of the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VEXUS) score to track dynamic change in volume status in patients undergoing fluid removal during haemodialysis - the ACUVEX study. Ultrasound J. 2024;16(1):23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, Prost JF, Ozier Y, Bourdarias JP. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation. 1983;68(2):266–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie J, Xu L, Peng K, Chen J, Wan JJ. Comparison between changes in systolic-pressure variation and pulse-pressure variation after passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative critically Ill patients. J Cardiothor Vasc An. 2024;38(2):459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatterjee K. The Swan-Ganz catheters: past, present, and future A viewpoint. Circulation. 2009;119(1):147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoo TK, Miyashita S, Davoudi F, Imahira U, Al-Obaidi A, Chweich H, et al. Clinical impact of pulmonary artery catheter in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023;55:58–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Panebianco NL, Mayo PH, Arntfield RT, Brown SM, Diaz-Gomez J, Hernandez A, et al. Assessing competence in critical care echocardiography: Development and initial results of an examination and certification processes. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(8):1285–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cholley B. Echocardiography in the intensive care unit: beyond “eyeballing”. A plea for the broader use of the aortic velocity-time integral measurement. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(6):898–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diaz-Gomez JL, Mayo PH, Koenig SJ. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(17):1593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu H, Huang H, Li M, Gao X, Yin L, Qi R, et al. A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager. Nature. 2023;613(7945):667–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685–713; quiz 86–8.

  11. Kane CJ, Salama AA, Pislaru C, Kane GC, Pislaru SV, Lin G. Low pulmonary artery pulsatility index by echocardiography is associated with increased mortality in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023;36(2):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kayarian F, Patel D, O’Brien JR, Schraft EK, Gottlieb M. Artificial intelligence and point-of-care ultrasound: Benefits, limitations, and implications for the future. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;80:119–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang YC, Chen KW, Tsai BY, Wu MY, Hsieh PH, Wei JT, et al. Implementation of an all-day artificial intelligence-based triage system to accelerate door-to-balloon times. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022;97(12):2291–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu J, Tasken AA, Flade HM, Skogvoll E, Berg EAR, Grenne B, et al. Automatic assessment of left ventricular function for hemodynamic monitoring using artificial intelligence and transesophageal echocardiography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024;38(2):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing, reviewing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Diaz Milian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Diaz-Milian serves as a Section Editor for Current Pulmonology Reports. Dr. Pandompatam and Dr. Moreno Franco do not have any conflict of interest to report.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diaz Milian, R., Pandompatam, G. & Moreno Franco, P. Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Critical Care: Evolution, Current State, and Future Prospects. Curr Pulmonol Rep (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13665-024-00353-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13665-024-00353-0

Keywords

Navigation