Abstract
This paper examines which factors have an impact on the price of finite resources. Firstly, empirical and theoretical approaches used to study the development of resource prices are considered. These drivers are then studied, individually as well as altogether, starting with the Hotelling model. Implications for the future price of finite resources are subsequently reviewed, and theoretical hypotheses derived. These are then tested by means of a qualitative review based on empirical findings. This paper demonstrates how current approaches have limited applicability in determining which drivers impact the price of finite resources. One of the main reasons is identified as the Hotelling’s model’s lack of accounting for growth in demand for finite resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In contrast, the following case would be possible as well: If, because of a legal requirement, mandatory recycling of a non-renewable resource is introduced and the cost of recycling is higher than the cost of mining the resource, this would cause a hypothetical price jump upwards.
References
Achzet B, Reller A, Zepf V, Rennie C, Ashfield M, Simmons J (2011) Materials critical to the energy industry. An introduction, University of Augsburg, Augsburg
Ackerman F, Gallagher K (2002) Mixed signals: market incentives, recycling, and the price spike of 1995. Resour Conserv Recycl 35(4):275–295
Ahumada H, Cornejo M (2014) Explaining commodity prices by a cointegrated time series-cross section model. Empir Econ 2014:1–24
Alonso E (2010) Material scarcity from the perspective of manufacturing firms: case studies of platinum and cobalt, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Barnett H, Morse C (1963) Scarcity and growth: the economics of natural resource availability. Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore
Bentzen J (2007) Does OPEC influence crude oil prices? Testing for co-movements and causality between regional crude oil prices. Appl Econ 39:1375–1385
Berck P (1981) Optimal management of renewable resources with growing demand and stock externalities. J Environ Econ Manag 8(2):105–117
Berck P, Roberts M (1996) Natural resource prices: will they ever turn up? J Environ Econ Manag 31:65–78
Berglund C, Söderholm P (2003) An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization. Environ Resour Econ 26(3):429–456
Bloomberg (2009) Sasol, Shenhua Group May Complete Coal-to-Fuel Plant by 2013. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid = newsarchive&sid = a.MSdPvb0Ep8 (Accessed 05 July 2012)
Buñuel M (2002) Estimating the Effects of Technology and Depletion on the Real Price of Copper in the U.S. Using a Cointegration Approach. 2002 World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists [online] http://weber.ucsd.edu/~carsonvs/papers/281.pdf (Accessed 12 September 2012)
Cerda RA (2007) Market power and primary commodity prices: the case of copper. Appl Econ Lett 14:775–778
Chai J, Guo J-E, Meng L, Wang S-Y (2011) Exploring the core factors and its dynamic effects on oil price: an application on path analysis and BVAR-TVP model. Energy Policy 39:8022–8036
Chakravorty U, Roumasset J, Tse K (1997) Endogenous substitution among energy resources and global warming. J Polit Econ 105(6):1201–1234
Chermak JM, Patrick R (2002) Comparing tests of the theory of exhaustible resources. Resour Energy Econ 24(4):301–325
Chevillon G, Rifflart C (2008) Physical market determinants of the price of crude oil and the market premium. Energy Econ 31:537–549
Copeland TE, Weston JF, Shastri K (2005) Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 4th edn., Amsterdam
Cuddington JT (1999) Long-run trends in 26 primary commodity prices. J Dev Econ 39:207–227
Cuddington JT, Moss DL (2001) Technological change, depletion and the U.S. Petroleum industry. Am Econ Rev 91:1135–1148
d’Arge RC (1971) Essay on economic growth and environmental quality. Swed J Econ, Environ Econ 73(1):25–41
Dasgupta P, Stiglitz J (1981) Resource depletion under technological uncertainty. Econometrica 49(1):85–104
Devarajan S, Fisher AC (1981) Hotelling’s “economics of exhaustible resources”: fifty years later. J Econ Lit 19(1):65–73
Di Vita G (2007) Exhaustible resources and secondary materials: a macroeconomic analysis. Ecol Econ 63(1):138–148
Dry ME (2002) The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000. Catal Today 71:227–241
Eggert RG (1991) An empirical and conceptual introduction. Resour Policy 17(2):91–99
Farrow S (1985) Testing the efficiency of extraction from a stock resource. J Polit Econ 93:452–487
Farzin YH (1984) The effect of the discount rate on depletion of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 92:841–851
Faucheux S, Noël J-F (1995) Economie des ressources naturelles et de l’environnement, Paris
Fisher AC (1981) Resource and environmental economics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gallo A, Mason P, Shapiro S, Fabritius M (2010) What is behind the increase in oil prices? Analyzing oil consumption and supply relationship with oil price. Energy 35:4126–4141
Gaudet G (2007) Natural resource economics under the rule of Hotelling. Can J Econ/Rev Can d’économique 40(4):1033–1059
Gibert RJ (1979) Optimal depletion of an uncertain stock. Rev Econ Stud 46:47–57
Gray LC (1914) Rent under the assumption of exhaustibility. Q J Econ 28:466–489
Heal G (1976) The relationship between price and extraction cost for a resource with a backstop technology. Bell J Econ 7(2):371–378
Heal G (1981) Empirical investigation of the long-term movement of resource prices – a preliminary report. Econ Lett 7:95–103
Hoel M (1978) Resource extraction and recycling with environmental costs. J Environ Econ Manag 5(3):220–235
Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39(2):137–175
Huhtala A (1999) Optimizing production technology choices: conventional production vs. recycling. Resour Energy Econ 21(1):1–18
Kaufmann RK, Dees S, Karadeloglou P, Sánchez M (2004) Does OPEC matter? an econometric analysis of Oil prices. Energy J 25:67–90
Klotz P, Lin TC, Hsu S-H (2014) Global commodity prices economic activity and monetary policy: the relevance of China. Resour Policy 42:1–9
Krautkraemer JA (1986) Optimal depletion with resource amenities and a backstop technology. Resour Energy 8(2):133–149
Krautkraemer JA (1998) Nonrenewable resource scarcity. J Econ Lit 36(4):2065–2107
Krohns S, Lunkenheimer P, Meissner S, Reller A, Gleich B, Rathgeber A, Gaugler T, Buhl HU, Sinclair DC, Loidl A (2011) The route to resource-efficient novel materials. Nat Mater 10:899–901
Kumar RC (2002) How long to eat a cake of unknown size? Optimal time horizon under uncertainty. Can J Econ 35:843–853
Lasserre P, Ouellette P (1988) On measuring and comparing total factor productivities in extractive and non-extractive sectors. Can J Econ 21(4):826–834
Lee J, List JA, Strazicich MC (2006) Non-renewable resource prices: deterministic or stochastic trends? J Environ Econ Manag 51:354–370
Levhari D, Liviatan N (1977) Notes on Hotelling’s economics of exhaustible resources. Can J Econ 10:177–192
Lewis TR, Matthews SA, Burness HS (1979) Monopoly and the rate of extraction of exhaustible resources. Am Econ Rev 69:227–230
Livernois J, Thille H, Zhang X (2006) A test of the Hotelling rule using old-growth timber data. Can J Econ 39:163–186
London Metal Exchange. [online] http://www.lme.com/aluminium_graphs.asp; http://www.lme.com/copper_graphs.asp; http://www.lme.com/lead_graphs.asp; http://www.lme.com/zinc_graphs.asp (Accessed 15 September 2012).
Malthus T (1998) An Essay on the Principle of Population, published for J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard 1798
McRae JJ (1978) On the stability of non-replenishable resource prices. Can J Econ 11:287–299
Miller MH, Upton CWA (1985) A Test of the Hotelling Valuation Principle. J Polit Econ 93:1–25
Narayan PK, Narayan S (2007) Modelling oil price volatility. Energy Policy 35(12):6549–6553
Nordhaus WD, Houthakker H, Solow R (1973) The allocation of energy resources. Brook Pap Econ Act 3:529–576
Papież M, Śmiech S, Dąbrowski MA (2014) The impact of the Euro area macroeconomy on energy and non-energy global commodity prices
Pindyck RS (1978) The optimal exploration and production of nonrenewable resources. J Polit Econ 86:841–861
Pindyck RS (1980) Uncertainty and exhaustible resource markets. J Polit Econ 88:1203–1225
Pollard D et al (2010) Living Planet Report 2010 - Biodiversity, biocapacity and development, WWF International, Institute of Zoology, Global Footprint Network
Radetzki M (2006) The anatomy of three commodity booms. Resour Policy 31:56–64
Radetzki M, Eggert RG, Lagos G, Lima M, Tilton JE (2008) The boom in mineral markets: How long might it last? Resour Policy 33(3):125–128
Ricardo, D. (1817) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, published in London, J. Murray 1821 (3)
Rosenau-Tornow D, Buchholz P, Riemann A, Wagner M (2009) Assessing the long-term supply risks for mineral raw materials – a combined evaluation of past and future trends. Resour Policy 34:161–175
Schmitz JA Jr (2005) What determines productivity? Lessons from the dramatic recovery of the U.S. and Canadian iron ore industries following their early 1980s crisis. J Polit Econ 113:582–625
Shadman F (2006) Environmental Challenges and Opportunities in Nano-Manfacturing
Skinner BJ (1989) Resources in the 21st century: Can supplies meet needs? Episodes 12:267–275
Slade ME (1982) Trends in natural-resource commodity prices: an analysis of the time domain. J Environ Econ Manag 9:122–137
Slade ME, Thille H (2009) Whither Hotelling: tests of the theory of exhaustible resources. Ann Rev Resour Econ 1:239–260
Smith VK (1979) Natural resource scarcity: a statistical analysis. Rev Econ Stat 61:423–427
Stiglitz JE (1976) Monopoly and the rate of extraction of exhaustible resources. Am Econ Rev 66(4):655–661
Stollery KR (1983) Mineral depletion with cost as the extraction limit: a model applied to the behavior of prices in the nickel industry. J Environ Econ Manag 10:151–165
Svedberg P, Tilton JE (2006) The real, real price of nonrenewable resources: copper 1870–2000. World Dev 34(3):501–519
The Swedish Forest Industries Federation (2011) The Swedish Forest Industries - Facts and figures 2010 [online] http://www.forestindustries.se/MediaBinaryLoader.axd?MediaArchive_FileID = f1c328 b7-f298-492d-a418-d9b036604cdf&MediaArchive_ForceDownload = true (Accessed 20 August 2012)
Tilton JE (1999) The future of recycling. Resour Policy 25:197–204
Tilton JE (2002) On Borrowed Time: Assessing the Threat of Mineral Depletion Washington, Resources for the Future
USGS (2011) Historical Statistics for Mineral and Material Commodities in the United States: Copper [online] http://minerals.usgs.gov/ds/2005/140/ds140-coppe.xls (Accessed 25 September 2012)
Weinstein MC, Zeckhauser RJ (1974) Use patterns for depletable and recycleable resources. Rev Econ Stud Symp Econ Exhaustible Resour 41:67–88
WVF, WirtschaftsVereinigung Metalle (2010) Metallstatistik 2010 [online] http://www.wvmetalle.de/wvm profi/medien/doc_7361_2011720153642.pdf (Accessed 9 June 2012)
Yaksic A, Tilton JE (2009) Using the cumulative availability curve to assess the threat of mineral depletion: the case of lithium. Resour Policy 34:185–194
Young D, Ryan DL (1996) Empirical testing of a risk-adjusted Hotelling model. Resour Energy Econ 18(3):265–289
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Derivation of the price path of a finite resource: Basic Hotelling model
In order to solve the equation – with the constraint of the finiteness of the resource – Lagrange’s approach can be applied. Therefore, the Lagrange function
and the corresponding system of equations
including the constraint
can be constructed. Solving this set of equations, it can be easily derived that maximum profit is reached if discounted prices of each period of time are equal:
Transforming this equation, the price path of a finite resource can be derived as follows:
Appendix 2
Derivation of the price path of a finite resource: Simultaneous integration of supply-side drivers
If extraction costs are assumed to exist in a monopolistic market structure which also includes the risk determinant, backstop technology and recycling, the following Lagrangian function can be derived:
The corresponding system of equations can be set as
including the constraint
Solving this system of equations analogously to the above-mentioned basic Hotelling model, the following optimal price path can be derived, representing the simultaneous appearance of extraction costs – including adjustments caused both by technical progress and degradation – as well as monopolistic market power, risk, backstop technology and recycling:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaugler, T. What drives resource prices? A qualitative review with recommendations for further development of the Hotelling model. Miner Econ 28, 37–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-015-0064-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-015-0064-1