Skip to main content
Log in

What drives resource prices? A qualitative review with recommendations for further development of the Hotelling model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines which factors have an impact on the price of finite resources. Firstly, empirical and theoretical approaches used to study the development of resource prices are considered. These drivers are then studied, individually as well as altogether, starting with the Hotelling model. Implications for the future price of finite resources are subsequently reviewed, and theoretical hypotheses derived. These are then tested by means of a qualitative review based on empirical findings. This paper demonstrates how current approaches have limited applicability in determining which drivers impact the price of finite resources. One of the main reasons is identified as the Hotelling’s model’s lack of accounting for growth in demand for finite resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In contrast, the following case would be possible as well: If, because of a legal requirement, mandatory recycling of a non-renewable resource is introduced and the cost of recycling is higher than the cost of mining the resource, this would cause a hypothetical price jump upwards.

References

  • Achzet B, Reller A, Zepf V, Rennie C, Ashfield M, Simmons J (2011) Materials critical to the energy industry. An introduction, University of Augsburg, Augsburg

  • Ackerman F, Gallagher K (2002) Mixed signals: market incentives, recycling, and the price spike of 1995. Resour Conserv Recycl 35(4):275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahumada H, Cornejo M (2014) Explaining commodity prices by a cointegrated time series-cross section model. Empir Econ 2014:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso E (2010) Material scarcity from the perspective of manufacturing firms: case studies of platinum and cobalt, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Barnett H, Morse C (1963) Scarcity and growth: the economics of natural resource availability. Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen J (2007) Does OPEC influence crude oil prices? Testing for co-movements and causality between regional crude oil prices. Appl Econ 39:1375–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berck P (1981) Optimal management of renewable resources with growing demand and stock externalities. J Environ Econ Manag 8(2):105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berck P, Roberts M (1996) Natural resource prices: will they ever turn up? J Environ Econ Manag 31:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund C, Söderholm P (2003) An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization. Environ Resour Econ 26(3):429–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg (2009) Sasol, Shenhua Group May Complete Coal-to-Fuel Plant by 2013. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid = newsarchive&sid = a.MSdPvb0Ep8 (Accessed 05 July 2012)

  • Buñuel M (2002) Estimating the Effects of Technology and Depletion on the Real Price of Copper in the U.S. Using a Cointegration Approach. 2002 World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists [online] http://weber.ucsd.edu/~carsonvs/papers/281.pdf (Accessed 12 September 2012)

  • Cerda RA (2007) Market power and primary commodity prices: the case of copper. Appl Econ Lett 14:775–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai J, Guo J-E, Meng L, Wang S-Y (2011) Exploring the core factors and its dynamic effects on oil price: an application on path analysis and BVAR-TVP model. Energy Policy 39:8022–8036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravorty U, Roumasset J, Tse K (1997) Endogenous substitution among energy resources and global warming. J Polit Econ 105(6):1201–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermak JM, Patrick R (2002) Comparing tests of the theory of exhaustible resources. Resour Energy Econ 24(4):301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevillon G, Rifflart C (2008) Physical market determinants of the price of crude oil and the market premium. Energy Econ 31:537–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland TE, Weston JF, Shastri K (2005) Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 4th edn., Amsterdam

  • Cuddington JT (1999) Long-run trends in 26 primary commodity prices. J Dev Econ 39:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddington JT, Moss DL (2001) Technological change, depletion and the U.S. Petroleum industry. Am Econ Rev 91:1135–1148

  • d’Arge RC (1971) Essay on economic growth and environmental quality. Swed J Econ, Environ Econ 73(1):25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Stiglitz J (1981) Resource depletion under technological uncertainty. Econometrica 49(1):85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan S, Fisher AC (1981) Hotelling’s “economics of exhaustible resources”: fifty years later. J Econ Lit 19(1):65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vita G (2007) Exhaustible resources and secondary materials: a macroeconomic analysis. Ecol Econ 63(1):138–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dry ME (2002) The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000. Catal Today 71:227–241

  • Eggert RG (1991) An empirical and conceptual introduction. Resour Policy 17(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow S (1985) Testing the efficiency of extraction from a stock resource. J Polit Econ 93:452–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzin YH (1984) The effect of the discount rate on depletion of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 92:841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faucheux S, Noël J-F (1995) Economie des ressources naturelles et de l’environnement, Paris

  • Fisher AC (1981) Resource and environmental economics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo A, Mason P, Shapiro S, Fabritius M (2010) What is behind the increase in oil prices? Analyzing oil consumption and supply relationship with oil price. Energy 35:4126–4141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudet G (2007) Natural resource economics under the rule of Hotelling. Can J Econ/Rev Can d’économique 40(4):1033–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert RJ (1979) Optimal depletion of an uncertain stock. Rev Econ Stud 46:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray LC (1914) Rent under the assumption of exhaustibility. Q J Econ 28:466–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (1976) The relationship between price and extraction cost for a resource with a backstop technology. Bell J Econ 7(2):371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (1981) Empirical investigation of the long-term movement of resource prices – a preliminary report. Econ Lett 7:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel M (1978) Resource extraction and recycling with environmental costs. J Environ Econ Manag 5(3):220–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39(2):137–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhtala A (1999) Optimizing production technology choices: conventional production vs. recycling. Resour Energy Econ 21(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann RK, Dees S, Karadeloglou P, Sánchez M (2004) Does OPEC matter? an econometric analysis of Oil prices. Energy J 25:67–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz P, Lin TC, Hsu S-H (2014) Global commodity prices economic activity and monetary policy: the relevance of China. Resour Policy 42:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer JA (1986) Optimal depletion with resource amenities and a backstop technology. Resour Energy 8(2):133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer JA (1998) Nonrenewable resource scarcity. J Econ Lit 36(4):2065–2107

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohns S, Lunkenheimer P, Meissner S, Reller A, Gleich B, Rathgeber A, Gaugler T, Buhl HU, Sinclair DC, Loidl A (2011) The route to resource-efficient novel materials. Nat Mater 10:899–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar RC (2002) How long to eat a cake of unknown size? Optimal time horizon under uncertainty. Can J Econ 35:843–853

  • Lasserre P, Ouellette P (1988) On measuring and comparing total factor productivities in extractive and non-extractive sectors. Can J Econ 21(4):826–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, List JA, Strazicich MC (2006) Non-renewable resource prices: deterministic or stochastic trends? J Environ Econ Manag 51:354–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levhari D, Liviatan N (1977) Notes on Hotelling’s economics of exhaustible resources. Can J Econ 10:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis TR, Matthews SA, Burness HS (1979) Monopoly and the rate of extraction of exhaustible resources. Am Econ Rev 69:227–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Livernois J, Thille H, Zhang X (2006) A test of the Hotelling rule using old-growth timber data. Can J Econ 39:163–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London Metal Exchange. [online] http://www.lme.com/aluminium_graphs.asp; http://www.lme.com/copper_graphs.asp; http://www.lme.com/lead_graphs.asp; http://www.lme.com/zinc_graphs.asp (Accessed 15 September 2012).

  • Malthus T (1998) An Essay on the Principle of Population, published for J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard 1798

  • McRae JJ (1978) On the stability of non-replenishable resource prices. Can J Econ 11:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MH, Upton CWA (1985) A Test of the Hotelling Valuation Principle. J Polit Econ 93:1–25

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2007) Modelling oil price volatility. Energy Policy 35(12):6549–6553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD, Houthakker H, Solow R (1973) The allocation of energy resources. Brook Pap Econ Act 3:529–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papież M, Śmiech S, Dąbrowski MA (2014) The impact of the Euro area macroeconomy on energy and non-energy global commodity prices

  • Pindyck RS (1978) The optimal exploration and production of nonrenewable resources. J Polit Econ 86:841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS (1980) Uncertainty and exhaustible resource markets. J Polit Econ 88:1203–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard D et al (2010) Living Planet Report 2010 - Biodiversity, biocapacity and development, WWF International, Institute of Zoology, Global Footprint Network

  • Radetzki M (2006) The anatomy of three commodity booms. Resour Policy 31:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radetzki M, Eggert RG, Lagos G, Lima M, Tilton JE (2008) The boom in mineral markets: How long might it last? Resour Policy 33(3):125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, published in London, J. Murray 1821 (3)

  • Rosenau-Tornow D, Buchholz P, Riemann A, Wagner M (2009) Assessing the long-term supply risks for mineral raw materials – a combined evaluation of past and future trends. Resour Policy 34:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz JA Jr (2005) What determines productivity? Lessons from the dramatic recovery of the U.S. and Canadian iron ore industries following their early 1980s crisis. J Polit Econ 113:582–625

  • Shadman F (2006) Environmental Challenges and Opportunities in Nano-Manfacturing

  • Skinner BJ (1989) Resources in the 21st century: Can supplies meet needs? Episodes 12:267–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade ME (1982) Trends in natural-resource commodity prices: an analysis of the time domain. J Environ Econ Manag 9:122–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade ME, Thille H (2009) Whither Hotelling: tests of the theory of exhaustible resources. Ann Rev Resour Econ 1:239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK (1979) Natural resource scarcity: a statistical analysis. Rev Econ Stat 61:423–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1976) Monopoly and the rate of extraction of exhaustible resources. Am Econ Rev 66(4):655–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Stollery KR (1983) Mineral depletion with cost as the extraction limit: a model applied to the behavior of prices in the nickel industry. J Environ Econ Manag 10:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svedberg P, Tilton JE (2006) The real, real price of nonrenewable resources: copper 1870–2000. World Dev 34(3):501–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Swedish Forest Industries Federation (2011) The Swedish Forest Industries - Facts and figures 2010 [online] http://www.forestindustries.se/MediaBinaryLoader.axd?MediaArchive_FileID = f1c328 b7-f298-492d-a418-d9b036604cdf&MediaArchive_ForceDownload = true (Accessed 20 August 2012)

  • Tilton JE (1999) The future of recycling. Resour Policy 25:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilton JE (2002) On Borrowed Time: Assessing the Threat of Mineral Depletion Washington, Resources for the Future

  • USGS (2011) Historical Statistics for Mineral and Material Commodities in the United States: Copper [online] http://minerals.usgs.gov/ds/2005/140/ds140-coppe.xls (Accessed 25 September 2012)

  • Weinstein MC, Zeckhauser RJ (1974) Use patterns for depletable and recycleable resources. Rev Econ Stud Symp Econ Exhaustible Resour 41:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WVF, WirtschaftsVereinigung Metalle (2010) Metallstatistik 2010 [online] http://www.wvmetalle.de/wvm profi/medien/doc_7361_2011720153642.pdf (Accessed 9 June 2012)

  • Yaksic A, Tilton JE (2009) Using the cumulative availability curve to assess the threat of mineral depletion: the case of lithium. Resour Policy 34:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young D, Ryan DL (1996) Empirical testing of a risk-adjusted Hotelling model. Resour Energy Econ 18(3):265–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Gaugler.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Derivation of the price path of a finite resource: Basic Hotelling model

$$ G\left({y}_t\right)={\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}\frac{p_t{y}_t}{{\left(1+\gamma \right)}^t} $$

In order to solve the equation – with the constraint of the finiteness of the resource – Lagrange’s approach can be applied. Therefore, the Lagrange function

$$ L\left(y,t\right)={\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}\frac{p_t{y}_t}{{\left(1+\gamma \right)}^t}+\lambda \left(\overline{y}-{\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}{y}_t\right) $$

and the corresponding system of equations

$$ \begin{array}{c}\hfill \frac{\partial L}{\partial {y}_0}={p}_0-\lambda =0\hfill \\ {}\hfill \frac{\partial L}{\partial {y}_1}=\frac{p_1}{1+\gamma }-\lambda =0\hfill \\ {}\hfill \vdots \hfill \\ {}\hfill \frac{\partial L}{\partial {y}_T}=\frac{p_T}{{\left(1+\gamma \right)}^T}-\lambda =0\hfill \end{array} $$

including the constraint

$$ \overline{y}={\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}{y}_t $$

can be constructed. Solving this set of equations, it can be easily derived that maximum profit is reached if discounted prices of each period of time are equal:

$$ {p}_0=\frac{p_1}{1+\gamma }=\frac{p_2}{{\left(1+\gamma \right)}^2}=\dots =\frac{p_T}{{\left(1+\gamma \right)}^T}=\lambda $$

Transforming this equation, the price path of a finite resource can be derived as follows:

$$ {p}_t={p}_0{\left(1+\gamma \right)}^t $$

Appendix 2

Derivation of the price path of a finite resource: Simultaneous integration of supply-side drivers

If extraction costs are assumed to exist in a monopolistic market structure which also includes the risk determinant, backstop technology and recycling, the following Lagrangian function can be derived:

$$ \begin{array}{c}\hfill L\left(y,t\right)={\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}\frac{p\left(y,t\right)y(t)}{{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t}-{\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}\frac{c(t)y(t)}{{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t}+{\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}\frac{\varDelta {c}_{tp}(t)y(t)}{{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t}\hfill \\ {}\hfill -{\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}\frac{\varDelta {c}_{dg}(t)y(t)}{{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t}+{\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}\frac{\varDelta {c}_{re}(t)y(t)}{{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t}-\lambda \left(\overline{y}-{\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}y(t)\right)\hfill \end{array} $$

The corresponding system of equations can be set as

$$ \begin{array}{c}\hfill \frac{\partial L}{\partial {y}_0}=\frac{\partial {p}_0\left({y}_0\right)}{\partial {y}_0}{y}_0+{p}_0\left({y}_0\right)-{c}_0+\Delta {c}_{tp,0}-\Delta {c}_{dg,0}+\Delta {c}_{re,0}-\lambda =0\hfill \\ {}\hfill \frac{\partial L}{\partial {y}_1}=\frac{\frac{\partial {p}_1\left({y}_1\right)}{\partial {y}_1}{y}_1}{1+{r}_{ra}}+\frac{p_1\left({y}_1\right)}{1+{r}_{ra}}-\frac{c_1}{1+{r}_{ra}}+\frac{\Delta {c}_{tp,1}}{1+{r}_{ra}}-\frac{\varDelta {c}_{dg,1}}{1+{r}_{ra}}+\frac{\Delta {c}_{re,1}}{1+{r}_{ra}}-\lambda =0\hfill \\ {}\hfill \vdots \hfill \\ {}\hfill \frac{\partial L}{\partial {y}_T}=\frac{\frac{\partial {p}_T\left({y}_T\right)}{\partial {y}_T}{y}_T}{{\left(1+{r}_{ra}\right)}^T}+\frac{p_T\left({y}_T\right)}{{\left(1+{r}_{ra}\right)}^T}-\frac{c_T}{{\left(1+{r}_{ra}\right)}^T}+\frac{\varDelta {c}_{tp,T}}{{\left(1+{r}_{ra}\right)}^T}-\frac{\varDelta {c}_{dg,T}}{{\left(1+{r}_{ra}\right)}^T}+\frac{\varDelta {c}_{re,T}}{{\left(1+{r}_{ra}\right)}^T}-\lambda =0\hfill \end{array} $$

including the constraint

$$ \overline{y}={\displaystyle \sum_{t=0}^T}{y}_t. $$

Solving this system of equations analogously to the above-mentioned basic Hotelling model, the following optimal price path can be derived, representing the simultaneous appearance of extraction costs – including adjustments caused both by technical progress and degradation – as well as monopolistic market power, risk, backstop technology and recycling:

$$ \begin{array}{c}\hfill p\left(y,t\right)= min\left(\right(\frac{\partial {p}_0\left({y}_0\right)}{\partial \left({y}_0\right)}{y}_0{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t-\frac{\partial p\left(y,t\right)}{\partial y(t)}y(t)+{p}_0\left({y}_0\right){\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t-{c}_0{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t+c(t)\hfill \\ {}\hfill +\varDelta {c}_{tp,0}{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t-\varDelta {c}_{tp,t}-\varDelta {c}_{dg,0}{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t+\varDelta {c}_{dg,t}+\varDelta {c}_{re,0}{\left(1+{\gamma}_{ra}\right)}^t\hfill \\ {}\hfill -\varDelta {c}_{re,t}\left){p}_{bs,t}\right)\hfill \end{array} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaugler, T. What drives resource prices? A qualitative review with recommendations for further development of the Hotelling model. Miner Econ 28, 37–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-015-0064-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-015-0064-1

Keywords

JEL

Navigation