Abstract
The disruptive technology which is proposed to allow for unmanned or autonomous operations has garnered attention both on land and at sea. The lack of a crew on board poses interesting and complex challenges for the operations of sea-going vessels. Our study dwells into one such challenge, i.e. the issue of determining a salvage reward of a crewless vessel. This is a study cutting across operational and legal issues since the law of ships is closely connected to the practice of mariners. We look at a recent incident which can be used to make analogous comparisons with what could, one day be the salvage of a crewless vessel. We propose that immense thought should be given to the study of salvage as a legal subject for crewless vessels. Our study finds that most of the traditional elements of a salvage reward are highly dependent on human centric factors which will be affected by a lack of crew. We argue that a less discretionary and more standardised formula should be put in place to determine salvage reward for crewless vessels. We also propose that a changing shipping eco-system would require changes to the understanding of salvage as a professional service.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Change history
17 April 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-023-00306-5
15 June 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-022-00283-1
Notes
Hereinafter referred to as ‘the judge’.
Hereinafter, paragraph number refers to respective paragraphs within (Reports 2020a).
References
AC (1925) San Onofre v Melanie, (1924) 20 Lloyd's Law Reports 89 (House of Lords)
Admiralty Court (2008) The Voutakos, (2008) 2 Lloyd's Law Reports 516 (England & Wales High Court)
Allen CH (2012) The seabots are coming here: should they be treated as vessels? J Navig 65:749–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463312000197
Appeal C of (1989) R v Donald Niven McNair and Peter Garratt Masters, (1989) 11 Criminal Appeal Reports Sentencing 465 (Court of Appeal)
Baughen S (2015) Shipping Law, 6th edn, Routledge
BBC (2019) Russian cargo ship grounded off Falmouth still detained in UK. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-50812186. Accessed Jun 2021
Bertram V (2002) Technologies for low-crew/no-crew ships. In: proceedings of forum captain computer, Brest. http://utopia.duth.gr/~agaster/papers/cite/Ships.pdf. Retrieved 9 Jun 2021
Bogusławski K, Gil M, Nasur J, Wróbel K (2022) Implications of autonomous shipping for maritime education and training : the cadet’s perspective. Marit Econ Logist. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00217-x
Burmeister H-C, Bruhn W, Rødseth ØJ, Porathe T (2014) Autonomous unmanned merchant vessel and its contribution towards the e-navigation implementation: the MUNIN perspective. Int J e-Navigation Marit Econ 1:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enavi.2014.12.002
Chen J, Zhang W, Wan Z et al (2019) Oil spills from global tankers: status review and future governance. J Clean Prod 227:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.020
Chiu CS, Liu CP, Chang KY et al (2017) Cost of salvage–a comparative form approach. J Mar Sci Technol 25:742–751. https://doi.org/10.6119/JMST-017-1226-15
DNV-GL (2018) Class Guideline: Autonomous and remotely operated ships. https://rules.dnv.com/docs/pdf/DNV/cg/2018-09/dnvgl-cg-0264.pdf. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
Ferreira F (2018) Regulatory and liability issues of autonomous surface vehicles. University of Pisa
Goerlandt F (2020) Maritime autonomous surface ships from a risk governance perspective: interpretation and implications. Saf Sci 128:104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104758
GOV.UK (2019) Grounding of bulk carrier Kuzma Minin, Accident Investigation Report 11/2019, 1 August 2019
Hasan S (2022) Analysing the definition of “ship” to facilitate marine autonomous surface ships as ship under the law of the sea. Aust J Marit Ocean Aff 0:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2022.2065115
IMO Autonomous Shipping (n.d.) https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Autonomousshipping.aspx. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
IMO (2021) IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee finalizes its analysis of ship safety treaties, to assess next steps for regulating maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS). https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/MASSRSE2021.aspx. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
IMO MSC (2020) Proposed terminology for MASS. London
ISU (2021) ISU statement regarding Ever Given refloating, Suez Canal, 29 March 2021, https://www.marine-salvage.com/isu-statementregarding-ever-given-refloating-suez-canal/. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
ISU (2019) Annual Review. https://www.marinesalvage.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ISU_Annual_Review_2019.pdf. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
ISU CC (2018) Charo Coll, ISU, An assessment of the current state of the marine salvage industry. https://www.marinesalvage.com/media-information/conference-papers/an-assessment-of-thecurrent-state-of-the-marine-salvage-industry/. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
Kongsberg Maritime GHM (2021) GH Midtbo, Kongsberg, Recotug Pushes Towage Operations Into The Future. https://www.kongsberg.com/maritime/the-full-picturemagazine/2021/5/recotug/. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
Kooij C, Hekkenberg R (2021) Identification of a task-based implementation path for unmanned autonomous ships. Marit Policy Manag 00:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1914878
Kretschmann L, Burmeister H, Jahn C (2017) Analyzing the economic benefit of unmanned autonomous ships: an exploratory cost-comparison between an autonomous and a conventional bulk carrier. Res Transp Bus Manag 25:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.06.002
Lords H (1997) Semco Salvage & Marine Pte Ltd v Lancer Navigation Co. Ltd, (1997) 1 Lloyd's Law Reports 323 (House of Lords)
Maritime Safety Committee IMO (2018) Maritime Safety Committee (MSC), 100th session, 3-7 December 2018. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/Pages/MSC-100th-session.aspx. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
MASRWG (2020) UK Maritime autonomous systems regulatory working group, maritime autonomous surface ships industry conductprinciples & code of practice version 4. https://www.maritimeuk.org/media-centre/publications/maritime-autonomous-surface-ships-industry-conduct-principles-code-practice-v4/. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
PD (1883) The Camelia, 9 PD 27
Pietrzykowski Z, Hajduk J (2019) Operations of maritime autonomous surface ships. TransNav Int J Mar Navig Saf Sea Transp 13:725–733. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.13.04.04
Porathe T (2016) A navigating navigator onboard or a monitoring operator ashore? Towards safe, effective, and sustainable maritime transportation: findings from five recent EU projects. Transp Res Procedia 14:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.060
Reports L law (1948) The Queen Elizabeth. 82 Lloyd’s Law Reports 803 (England & Wales High Court)
Reports L law (2020a) Keynvor Morlift Ltd v the vessel “Kuzma Minin”, 2 Lloyd's Law Reports 617 (England & Wales High Court)
Reports L law (2020b) The Ocean Prefect. 2 Lloyd's Law Reports 654 (England & Wales High Court)
Reports L law (1934) The Whippingham. 48 Lloyd's Law Reports 49 (England & Wales High Court)
Rødseth ØJ, Burmeister H-C (2012) Developments toward the unmanned ship. In: Proceedings of International Symposium Information on Ships–ISIS, Hamburg. http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/R%25C3%25B8dseth-Burmeister-2012-Developments-toward-the-unmanned-ship.pdf. Retrieved 9 Jun 2021
Rose FD (2021) Silver salvage services, 2 Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 227. https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=418788. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
Rose FD (2002) Kennedy & Rose: The law of salvage, 6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell
Suri M (2020) Autonomous ships and the proximate cause conundrum - a maritime and insurance law Tango. J Marit Law Commer 51:163–185
Sutton C (1945) An Enquiry into the Assessing of Salvage Awards 108:41–92
Swan C (2009) The restitutionary and economic Analyses of salvage law, (2009) 23 (1) Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal 99. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ANZMarLawJl/2009/10.html. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
Teitelbaum JC (2012) Inside the blackwall box: explaining U.S. marine salvage awards. SSRN Electron J 22:55–121. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2060973. Accessed 9 Jun 2021
Veal R (2021) Autonomous technology in shipping; an increased role for negligence product liability? In: autonomous Ships and the Law (IMLI Studies in International Maritime Law). Taylor and Francis, 278
Wróbel K, Montewka J, Kujala P (2017) Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 165:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.029
Wróbel K, Montewka J, Kujala P (2018) Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 178:209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.019
Ziajka-Poznańska E, Montewka J (2021) Costs and benefits of autonomous shipping—a literature review. Appl Sci 11:4553. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104553
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their comments which helped us improve the initial version of the manuscript.
Funding
The second author was supported by Gdynia Maritime University internal grant WN/2022/PZ/12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, writing — original draft and supervision. KW: methodology, investigation and writing — review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Suri, M., Wróbel, K. Identifying factors affecting salvage rewards of crewless vessels — lessons from a case study. WMU J Marit Affairs 21, 213–232 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-022-00276-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-022-00276-0