Abstract
China and the USA share the highest importance related to climate change, both in terms of their greenhouse gas emissions and their centrality to potential mitigation policies. Because college students represent the future leaders of these countries and because young adults have a longer time horizon and thus are more vulnerable to the long-term consequences of climate change, their opinions on this issue are of considerable interest. We report and interpret the results of online surveys of just over 4,000 college students from across China (n = 1670) and the USA (n = 2335) between September and November 2013. We examined perceptions and beliefs regarding the scientific basis and potential impacts of climate change as well as attitudes about policy responses. A substantially larger proportion of Chinese students reported acceptance of the considerable scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic climate change. In contrast, a smaller proportion of US students reported seeing a risk of harm to humans from climate change, while a higher proportion of US students reported being unconcerned about climate change compared to Chinese students. In terms of policy, Chinese respondents showed greater support for joining an international agreement to address climate change than Americans. Although the future of international climate change policy is uncertain, it is clear that meaningful climate change mitigation policies and actions must include the participation and cooperation of both China and the USA. Thus, the results of this study should be interesting and informative to all parties considering the issue of global climate change policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderegg WRL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12107–12109
Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ (2013) Global, regional and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN. doi:10.3334/cdiac/00001_v2013
Borick CP, Lachapelle E, Rabe BG (2011) Climate compared: public opinion on climate change in the United States and Canada. Issues in Governance Studies 39:1–13 http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2011/4/climate%20change%20opinion/04_climate_change_opinion. Accessed 1 October 2014
Boykoff M (2007) From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Trans Inst Br Geogr 32:477–489
Boykoff M (2013) Public enemy no. 1? Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. Am Behav Sci 57:796–817. doi:10.1177/0002764213476846
Brulle R, Carmichael J, Jenkins J (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Clim Change 114(2):169–188. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
Carlsson F, Kataria M, Krupnick A, Lampi E, Lofgren A, Qin P, Chung S, Sterner T (2010) Paying for mitigation: a multiple country study. Environment for Development. http://www.rff.org/rff/documents/EfD-DP-10-12.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
China Climate Change Communication Center (2013) Public climate change awareness and climate change communication in china. http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/2sided-highlights-China-e.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
CIA World Factbook (2014) https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed 10 June 2014
Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8:1–7. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Doran PT, Kendall Zimmerman M (2009) Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 90:22–23
Dunlap RE (2013) Climate change skepticism and denial: an introduction. Am Behav Sci 57:691–698. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environ 50:26–35. doi:10.3200/envt. 50.5.26-35
Eberhardt C (2012) Understanding climate change through the eyes of Chinese youth. World Policy Institute Blog, The Mantle. http://www.mantlethought.org/international-affairs/understanding-climate-change-through-eyes-chinese-youth. Accessed 15 January 2015
Feldman L, Nisbet M, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E (2010) The climate change generation? Survey analysis of the perceptions and beliefs of young Americans. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CT. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/YouthJan2010.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Feldman L, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2012) Climate on cable: the nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. Int J Press/Polit 17(1):3–31. doi:10.1177/1940161211425410
Giffard CA, Van Leuven N (2008) Five views on development: how news agencies cover the UN millennium development goals. J Glob Mass Commun 1:22–40
Gilley B (2012) Authoritarian environmentalism and China’s response to climate change. Environ Polit 21:287–307. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.651904
Guo X. & Marinova D (2011) Environmental awareness in China: facilitating the greening of the economy. 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Perth, Australia. http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=183188&local_base=GEN01-ERA02. Accessed 15 January 2015
Harman G (2014) Election 2014: does climate change stand a chance against the oil boom? http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2014/03/2014-election-climate-energy. Accessed 1 October 2014
IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–33
Jamelske E, Barrett B, Boulter J (2013) Comparing climate change awareness, perceptions, and beliefs of college students in the United States and China. J Environ Stud Sci 3(2):269–278. doi:10.1007/s13412-013-0144-x
Jang W, Frederick E (2013) A comparative analysis of American and China coverage of climate talks, 2007–2012. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL
Jones MD (2011) Leading the way to compromise? Cultural theory and climate change opinion. PS Politic Sci Politic 44(4):720–725. doi:10.1017/S104909651100134X
Kahan DM, Wittlin M, Peters E, Slovic P, Larrimore-Ouellette L, Braman D, Mandel GN (2011) The tragedy of the risk-perception commons: culture conflict, rationality conflict, and climate change. Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 89. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503. Accessed 10 December 2014
Krosnick JA, MacInnis B (2010) Frequent viewers of Fox News are less likely to accept scientists' views of global warming. Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Palo Alto, CA. http://woods.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/files/Global-Warming-Fox-News.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Krosnick JA, MacInnis B (2012)Trends in American public opinion on global warming policies between 2010 and 2012. https://woods.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/files/GW-Policy-Trend-2010-2012-1.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Howe P (2013) Global warming’s Six Americas, September 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Six-Americas-September-2012.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2014a) Climate change in the American mind: April, 2014. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Politics_and_Global_Warming.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2014b) Politics &global warming, Spring 2014. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Politics_and_Global_Warming.pdf.Accessed 1 October 2014
Libby R (2014) The litmus test of climate change. The Portland Sun. http://www.portlanddailysun.me/index.php/opinion/columns/12136-the-litmus-test-of-climate-change. Accessed 1 October 2014
Lim SS et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2095–2128. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12):61766-8
Liu JC-E, Leiserowitz AA (2009) From red to green? Environmental attitudes and behavior in urban China. Environ 51:32–45. doi:10.3200/ENV. 51.4.32-45
Ma W, Chen T-P (2014) Beijing’s bad-air days, finally counted. Wall Street Journal, China. http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/04/14/beijings-bad-air-days-finally-counted. Accessed 1 October 2014
McCaffrey MS, Buhr SM (2008) Clarifying climate confusion: addressing systemic holes, cognitive gaps, and misconceptions through climate literacy. Phys Geograph 29:512–528. doi:10.2747/0272-3646.29.6.512
National Development and Reform Commission (2009) China’s policies and actions for addressing climate change: the progress report. http://www.ccchina.gov.cn/WebSite/CCChina/UpFile/File571.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
National Development and Reform Commission (2012) China’s policies and actions for addressing climate change. http://www.ccchina.gov.cn/WebSite/CCChina/UpFile/File1324.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Oreskes N (2004) The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306:1686
Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury, New York
Painter J & Ashe T (2012) Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10. Environ Res Lett 7(4). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005
Peters G, Davis S, Andrew R (2012) A synthesis of carbon in international trade. Biogeosciences 9:3247–3276. doi:10.5194/bg-9-3247-2012
Pew Research Center (2008) A deeper partisan divide over global warming. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/417.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Pew Research Center (2009) Trends in political values and core attitudes: 1987–2009. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/517.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Pew Research Center (2013a) GOP deeply divided over climate change. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/11-1-13%20Global%20Warming%20Release.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Pew Research Center (2013b) Public’s policy priorities: 1994–2013. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/01-24-13%20Prioritie%20Release.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2014
Pooley E (2010) The climate war: true believers, power brokers and the fight to save the Earth. Hyperion, New York
Powell JL (2011) The inquisition of climate science. Columbia University Press, New York
Rabe BG, Borick CP (2010) The climate of belief: American public opinion on climate change. Issues in Governance Studies. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2010/1/climate%20rabe%20borick/01_climate_rabe_borick. Accessed 1 October 2014
Sanger DE (2001) Bush will continue to oppose Kyoto Pact on global warming. NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/12/world/bush-will-continue-to-oppose-kyoto-pact-on-global-warming.html. Accessed 1 October 2014
Schiermeier Q (2012) The Kyoto protocol: hot air. Nature 491:656–658. doi:10.1038/491656a
Shao F, Wang Y, Wang H (2010) Investment on environmental awareness of college students in Jinan. Environ Sci Manag 35(9):152–157
Tingley D, Tomz M (2014) Conditional cooperation and climate change. Comp Polit Stud 47:344–368. doi:10.1177/0010414013509571
Tolan S (2008) Coverage of climate change in Chinese media. Human Development Report 2007, Human Development Report Office, United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/tolan_sandy.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2015
Walsh J, Wuebbles D, Hayhoe K et al (2014) Appendix 4: frequently asked questions. Climate change impacts in the United States: the Third National Climate Assessment. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp. 790–820. doi:10.7930/J0G15XS3
Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66(4):315–328. doi:10.1037/a0023253
Wong E (2014) Most Chinese cities fail minimum air quality standards. NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/world/asia/most-chinese-cities-fail-pollution-standard-china-says.html. Accessed 1 October 2014
World Bank Data Center. http://data.worldbank.org. Accessed 10 June 2014
WRI, CAIT 2.0. (2014) Climate Analysis Indicators Tool: WRI’s climate data explorer. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. http://cait2.wri.org. Accessed 10 June 2014
Acknowledgments
Many thanks are given to all the students and professors at universities in China and the USA that participated in these surveys. We also acknowledge Elora Leene, Emy Marier, Wesley Meives, Liang Yifang, Wenqing Li, Xu Jiajing, and Zhang Ying for their excellent work as research assistants. Additionally, we are grateful for valuable comments from Yonghong Jiang, Shiying Wang, Bo Wang, Wang Ran, Yan Yunfeng, Yifan Yang, Yujie Li, Binbin Wang, Tao Hu, Endre Tvinnereim, and Matthew Winden. Funding for this research was provided by the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors of this article has any conflict of interest to report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamelske, E., Boulter, J., Jang, W. et al. Examining differences in public opinion on climate change between college students in China and the USA. J Environ Stud Sci 5, 87–98 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0229-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0229-9