Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of acoustic fields in aqueous biomass solutions of banana waste pretreated by power ultrasound

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-intensity ultrasound is a technology used to improve the performance of processes in the chemical, pharmaceutical, biomass pretreatment, and food industries. However, few studies were described in the literature to comprehend the acoustic wave propagation in the material and their efficiency in the process. Thus, this study aims to determine the acoustic fields of aqueous biomass solutions from flower stalk banana using the calorimetric method and a determined sonotrode position. These tests were conducted at temperatures from 0 to 60 °C and ultrasound power from 120, 160, to 320 W. Also, the specific heat capacity and density of the solution were determined experimentally as a function of the solution concentration (0.040 to 0.100 g biomass mL−1), pH (3, 5, and 7), and temperature. The position of the thermocouple was maintained at 1 cm from the sonotrode, and the ultrasound frequency was 24 kHz. The methods and results presented in this study can be used to reproduce acoustic field calculations in aqueous biomass solutions, aiming the construction of acoustic processor systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langan P, Gnanakaran S, Rector KD, Pawley N, Fox DT, Cho DW et al (2011) Exploring new strategies for cellulosic biofuels production. Energy Environment Sci 4:3820–3833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Velásquez-Arredondo HI, de Oliveira JS, Benjumea P (2012) Exergy efficiency analysis of chemical and biochemical stages involved in liquid biofuels production processes. Energy 41:138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, van de Broek R, Berndes G, Gielen D, Turkenburg W (2003) Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioenergy 25:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Villa-Vélez HA, Váquiro HA, Telis-Romero J (2015) The effect of power-ultrasound on the pretreatment of acidified aqueous solutions of banana flower-stalk: structural, chemical and statistical analysis. Ind Crop Prod 66:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond JB, Egg R, Diggins D, Coble CG (1996) Alcohol from bananas. Bioresour Technol 56:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tock JY, Lai CL, Lee KT, Tan KT, Bhatia S (2010) Banana biomass as potential renewable energy resource: a Malaysian case study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:798–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Olsen C, Arantes V, Saddler J (2012) The use of predictive models to optimize sugar recovery obtained after the steam pre-treatment of softwoods. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 6:534–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiong Q, Kong S-C, Passalacqua A (2013) Development of a generalized numerical framework for simulating biomass fast pyrolysis in fluidized-bed reactors. Chem Eng Sci 99:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiong Q, Aramideh S, Kong S-C (2013) Modeling effects of operating conditions on biomass fast pyrolysis in bubbling fluidized bed reactors. Energy Fuel 27:5948–5956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar P, Barret DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2011) Pulsed electric field pretreatment of switchgrass and wood chip species for biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:10996–11001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo J, Fang Z, Smith RL (2014) Ultrasound-enhanced conversion of biomass to biofuels. Prog Energ Combust Sci 41:56–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sawant SS, Anil AC, Krishnamurthy V, Gaonkar C, Kolwalkar J, Khandeparker L et al (2008) Effect of hydrodynamic cavitation on zooplankton: a tool for disinfection. Biochem Eng J 42:320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinjari DV, Pandit AB (2010) Cavitation milling of natural cellulose to nanofibrils. Ultrason Sonochem 17:845–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berlan J, Mason TJ (1992) Sonochemistry: from research laboratories to industrial plants. Ultrasonics 30:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cárcel JA, Benedito J, Mulet A (2012) Food process innovation through new technologies: use of ultrasound. J Food Eng 110:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Merouani S, Hamdaoui O, Rezgui Y, Guemini M (2014) Energy analysis during bubble oscillations: relationship between bubble energy and sonochemical parameters. Ultrasonics 54:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sasmal S, Goud VV, Mohanty K (2012) Ultrasound assisted lime pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass toward bioethanol production. Energy Fuel 26:3777–3784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park ND, Helle SS, Thring RW (2012) Combined alkaline and ultrasound pre-treatment of thickened pulp mill waste activated sludge for improved anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy 46:750–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khanel SK, Montabo M, Leeuwen J, Srinivasan G, Grewell D (2007) Ultrasound enhanced glucose release from corn in ethanol plants. Biotechnol Bioeng 98:978–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang J, Zhao Q, Wei L, Wang K, Lee D-J (2011) Degradation and characteristic changes of organic matter in sewage sludge, using microbial fuel cell with ultrasound pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 102:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Esfahani MR, Azin M (2012) Pretreatment of sugar cane bagasse by ultrasound energy and dilute acid. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 7:274–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rokhina EV, Repo E, Virkutyte J (2010) Comparative kinetic analysis of silent and ultrasound-assisted catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol. Ultrason Sonochem 17:541–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yunus R, Salleh SF, Abdullah N, Biak DRA (2010) Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment on low temperature acid hydrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch. Bioresour Technol 101:9792–9796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raso J, Mañas P, Pagán R, Sala FJ (1999) Influence of different factors on the output power transferred medium by ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 5:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiong Q, Xu F, Ramirez E, Pannala S, Daw CS (2016) Modeling the impact of bubbling bed hydrodynamics on tar yield and its fluctuations during biomass fast pyrolysis. Fuel 164:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Toma M, Fukutomi S, Asakura Y, Koda S (2011) A calorimetric study of energy conversion efficiency of a sonochemical reactor at 500 kHz for organic solvents. Ultrason Sonochem 18:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu Y, Zhang Z, Yang C (2008) Measurement of hydroxyl radical production in ultrasonics aqueous solutions by a novel chemiluminescence method. Ultrason Sonochem 15:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin S, Xu L (2012) Study on the radial vibration and acoustic field of an isotropic circular ring radiator. Ultrasonics 52:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moholkar VS, Sable SP, Pandit AB (2000) Mapping the cavitation intensity in an ultrasonic bath using the acoustic emission. AICHE J 46:684–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar A, Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2007) Mapping the efficacy of new designs for large scale sonochemical reactors. Ultrason Sonochem 14:538–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Margulis MA, Maximenko NA (1991) The influence of ultrasound on oscilating reactions. Appendix: measurement of ultrasound absorbed power (calorimetric method). In: Mason TJ (ed) Advances in sonochemistry, 2nd edn. JAI Press Inc, London, pp 1–328

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koda S, Kimura T, Kondo T, Mitone H (2003) A standard method to calibrate sonochemical efficiency of an individual reaction system. Ultrason Sonochem 10:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. AOAC (1997) Official methods of analysis international. Association of Offical Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mason TJ, Lorimer JP, Bates DM (1992) Quantifying sonochemistry: casting some light on a “black art”. Ultrasonics 30:40–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cevik A (2007) Unified formulation for web crippling strength of cold-formed steel sheeting using stepwise regression. J Constr Steel Res 63:1305–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Goodenough AE, Hart AG, Stafford R (2012) Regression with empirical variable selection: description of a new method and application to ecological datasets. PLoS One 7:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Y, Shi R, Shu S, Gao W (2013) Ensemble and enhanced PM10 concentration forecast model based on stepwise regression and wavelet analysis. Atmos Environ 74:346–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Castell-Palou A, Váquiro HA, Cárcel JA, Rosselló C, Femenia A, Simal S (2012) Mathematical modeling of moisture distribution and kinetics in cheese drying. Dry Technol 30:1247–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Korosi G, Kovats ES (1981) Density and surface tension of 83 organic liquids. J Chem Eng Data 26:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Petošic A, Svilar D, Ivancevic B (2011) Comparison of measured acoustic power results gained by using three different methods on an ultrasonic low-frequency device. Ultrason Sonochemistry 18:567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Villa-Vélez HA, Váquiro HA, Lopes-Filho JF, Telis VRN, Telis-Romero J (2015) Study of the specific heat capacity of biomass from banana waste for application in the second-generation ethanol industry. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 34:1221–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Brotchie F, Grieser F, Ashokkumar M (2009) Effect of power and frequency on bubble-size distributions in acoustic cavitation. Phys Rev Let 102:084302-084301–084302-084304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hauptmann M, Struyf H, Mertens P, Heyns M, De Gendt S, Glorieux C et al (2013) Towards an understanding and control of cavitation activity in 1 MHz ultrasound fileds. Ultrason Sonochemistry 20:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pantea C, Osterhoudt CF, Sinha DN (2013) Determination of acoustical nonlinear parameter β of water using the finite amplitude method. Ultrasonics 53:1012–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Prot. No.: 2013/17497-5) for this doctoral project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. A. Villa-Vélez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villa-Vélez, H.A., Cornelio, M.L., Corrêa, J.L.G. et al. Identification of acoustic fields in aqueous biomass solutions of banana waste pretreated by power ultrasound. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 8, 87–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0256-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0256-8

Keywords

Navigation