Abstract
A process has previously been optimized for production of lactic acid from recycled paper sludge (RPS), the ultimate solid waste obtained in the wastewater treatment plant of a local paper recycling mill. In this work, both separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) processes were improved under batch mode in bench-scale bioreactor. The use of bioreactor was advantageous, providing higher conversion rates, together with increased yield. By running SSF in bioreactor, 73.2 g L−1 of lactic acid has been produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 from 179 g L−1 RPS, corresponding to 76 % of maximum theoretical yield. Further process intensification, with improved kinetics and final product concentration, was achieved by applying a pulsed fed-batch strategy. With six pulsed additions of RPS (40 g at each 5 h), 108.2 g L−1 of lactic acid was produced (after 120 h, corresponding to 62 % yield). This achievement contributes to make more realistic the large-scale upgrading of RPS, a waste raw material exhibiting negative cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Martinez FAC, Balciunas EM, Salgado JM, González JMD, Converti A, de Souza Oliveira RP (2013) Lactic acid properties, applications and production: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 30:70–83
Mazzoli R, Bosco F, Mizrahi I, Bayer EA, Pessione E (2014) Towards lactic acid bacteria-based biorefineries. Biotechnol Adv 32:1216–1236
Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K (2013) Recently advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes. Biotechnol Adv 31:877–902
Åkerberg C, Zacchi G (2000) An economic evaluation of the fermentative production of lactic acid from wheat flour. Bioresour Technol 75:119–126
Wang Y, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K (2015) Fermentative production of lactic acid from renewable materials: recent achievements, prospects, and limits. J Biosci Bioeng 119:10–18
Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K (2011) Lactic acid production from lignocellulose derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria: overview and limits. J Biotechnol 156:286–301
Neureiter M, Danner H, Madzingaidzo L, Miyafuji H, Thornasser C, Bvochora J, Bamusi S, Braun R (2004) Lignocellulose feedstocks for the production of lactic acid. Chem Biochem Eng Q 18:55–63
Karam J, Nicell JA (1997) Potential applications of enzymes in waste treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 69:141–153
Marques S, Alves L, Roseiro JC, Gírio FM (2008) Conversion of recycled paper sludge to ethanol by SHF and SSF using Pichia stipitis. Biomass Bioenerg 32:400–406
Marques S, Santos JAL, Gírio FM, Roseiro JC (2008) Lactic acid production from recycled paper sludge by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Biochem Eng J 41:210–216
Min BC, Bhayani BV, Jampana VS, Ramarao BV (2015) Enhancement of the enzymatic hydrolysis of fines from recycled paper mill waste rejects. Bioresour Bioproc 2:40. doi:10.1186/s40643-015-0068-2
Gírio FM, Fonseca C, Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Marques S, Bogel-Łukasik R (2010) Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4775–4800
Eiteman MA, Ramalingam S (2015) Microbial production of lactic acid. Biotechnol Lett 37:955–972
John RP, Anisha G, Nampoothiri K, Pandey A (2009) Direct lactic acid fermentation: focus on simultaneous saccharification and lactic acid production. Biotechnol Adv 27:145–152
Alcántara C, Sarmiento-Rubiano LA, Monedero V, Deutscher J, Pérez-Martínez G, Yebra MJ (2008) Regulation of Lactobacillus casei sorbitol utilization genes requires DNA-binding transcriptional activator GutR and the conserved protein GutM. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5731–5740
Golias H, Dumsday GJ, Stanley GA, Pamment NB (2000) Characteristics of cellulase preparations affecting the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to ethanol. Biotechnol Lett 22:617–621
Nieves RA, Ehrman CI, Adney WS, Elander RT, Himmel ME (1998) Technical communication: survey and analysis of commercial cellulase preparations suitable for biomass conversion to ethanol. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 14:301–304
Quatravaux S, Remize F, Bryckaert E, Colavizza D, Guzzo J (2006) Examination of Lactobacillus plantarum lactate metabolism side effects in relation to the modulation of aeration parameters. J Appl Microbiol 101:903–912
Hofvendahl K, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microb Technol 26:87–107
Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K (2011) Lactic acid production from lignocellulose derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria: overview and limits. J Biotechnol 156:286–301
Nakasaki K, Adachi T (2003) Effects of intermittent addition of cellulase for production of L-lactic acid from wastewater sludge by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 82:263–270
Thomas S (2000) Production of lactic acid from pulp mill solid waste and xylose using Lactobacillus delbrueckii (NRRL B445). Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:455–468
Lee SM, Koo YM, Lin J (2004) Production of lactic acid from paper sludge by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Adv Biochem Eng/Biotechnol 87:173–194
Budhavaram NK, Fan Z (2009) Production of lactic acid from paper sludge using acid-tolerant, thermophilic Bacillus coagulans strains. Bioresour Technol 100:5966–5972
Schmidt S, Padukone N (1997) Production of lactic acid from wastepaper as a cellulosic feedstock. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 18:10–14
Abe S, Takagi M (1991) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to lactic acid. Biotechnol Bioeng 37:93–96
Parajó JC, Alonso JL, Moldes AB (1997) Production of lactic acid from lignocellulose in a single stage of hydrolysis and fermentation. Food Biotechnol 11:45–58
Bustos G, Moldes AB, Cruz JM, Dominguez JM (2005) Production of lactic acid from vine-trimming wastes and viticulture lees using a simultaneous saccharification fermentation method. J Sci Food Agric 85:466–472
Sreenath HK, Moldes AB, Koegel RG, Straub RJ (2001) Lactic acid production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of alfalfa fiber. J Biosci Bioeng 92:518–523
Yang S, Ding WY, Chen HZ (2006) Enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw in a tubular reactor coupled with UF membrane. Process Biochem 41:721–725
Knutsen JS, Davis RH (2004) Cellulase retention and sugar removal by membrane ultrafiltration during lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113:585–599
Smith BT, Knutsen JS, Davis RH (2010) Empirical evaluation of inhibitory product, substrate, and enzyme effects during the enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161:468–482
Romaní A, Yáñez R, Garrote G, Alonso JL (2008) SSF production of lactic acid from cellulosic biosludges. Bioresour Technol 99:4247–4254
Moldes AB, Alonso JL, Parajó JC (2001) Strategies to improve the bioconversion of processed wood into lactic acid by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76:279–284
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by EU INTEGRATED PROJECT Contract no. 026515-2. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. César Fonseca for the valuable discussions concerning the working plan and the critical reading of the manuscript and Eng. Raquel Pereira of Renova, S.A. (Torres Novas, Portugal), for providing the sludge material. The technical assistance of Carlos Barata is also acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Highlights
The process for RPS conversion into lactic acid was intensified at bioreactor scale.
RPS was effectively (76 % yield) converted into lactic acid (73 g L−1) by batch SSF.
Pulsed fed-batch strategy applied to SSF improved lactic acid production kinetics (108 g L−1, 62 % yield).
RPS upgrading will boost economic and environmental performance of paper industry.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marques, S., Gírio, F.M., Santos, J.A.L. et al. Pulsed fed-batch strategy towards intensified process for lactic acid production using recycled paper sludge. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 7, 127–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-016-0211-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-016-0211-0